Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

More on helmets

Started by Ozark Bicycle · · Last activity · 9 posts · 293 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 April 2006
Last activity
1 May 2006
Original author
Ozark Bicycle
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
293
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Some interesting stuff here regarding the helmet market and helmet
    marketing trends since 1993:

    http://tinyurl.com/nfkrt

    I haven't explored the other stuff on this site and, hence, have no
    comment.

    (Get out the Nomex!)

  2. Ozark Bicycle said:

    Some interesting stuff here regarding the helmet market and helmet
    marketing trends since 1993:

    http://tinyurl.com/nfkrt

    I haven't explored the other stuff on this site and, hence, have no
    comment.

    (Get out the Nomex!)

    The heck with the helmets, where'd these guys get those shoes???

    http://www.squirtlube.com/
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  3. Werehatrack said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    Some interesting stuff here regarding the helmet market and helmet
    marketing trends since 1993:

    http://tinyurl.com/nfkrt

    I haven't explored the other stuff on this site and, hence, have no
    comment.

    (Get out the Nomex!)

    The heck with the helmets, where'd these guys get those shoes???

    http://www.squirtlube.com/

    Dear Werehatrack,

    The heck with the shoes, where'd those guys get those really
    evil-looking helmets?

    http://www.squirtlube.com

    With the riders' heads down, the helmets look like the
    oncoming offspring of a smiley-face/evil-pumpkin shotgun
    marriage.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  4. "Werehatrack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:


    The heck with the helmets, where'd these guys get those shoes???

    Shoe covers, surely.

  5. On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:38 GMT, Werehatrack <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    Some interesting stuff here regarding the helmet market and helmet
    marketing trends since 1993:

    http://tinyurl.com/nfkrt

    I haven't explored the other stuff on this site and, hence, have no
    comment.

    (Get out the Nomex!)

    The heck with the helmets, where'd these guys get those shoes???

    http://www.squirtlube.com/

    Synchronicity denied, one of them isn't wearing his booties.

    Yellow shorts? Really guys, can we please not do that.

    Ron

  6. On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:06:13 GMT, RonSonic <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:38 GMT, Werehatrack <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    Some interesting stuff here regarding the helmet market and helmet
    marketing trends since 1993:

    http://tinyurl.com/nfkrt

    I haven't explored the other stuff on this site and, hence, have no
    comment.

    (Get out the Nomex!)

    The heck with the helmets, where'd these guys get those shoes???

    http://www.squirtlube.com/

    Synchronicity denied, one of them isn't wearing his booties.

    Yellow shorts? Really guys, can we please not do that.

    Let us be glad that bike racing sponsorships have not taken the turn
    that has put interesting paint jobs on some NASCAR entries.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  7. On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:58:36 GMT, Werehatrack <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:06:13 GMT, RonSonic <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:38 GMT, Werehatrack <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On 29 Apr 2006 13:20:32 -0700, "Ozark Bicycle"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >Some interesting stuff here regarding the helmet market and helmet
    >marketing trends since 1993:
    >
    >http://tinyurl.com/nfkrt
    >
    >I haven't explored the other stuff on this site and, hence, have no
    >comment.
    >
    >(Get out the Nomex!)

    The heck with the helmets, where'd these guys get those shoes???

    http://www.squirtlube.com/

    Synchronicity denied, one of them isn't wearing his booties.

    Yellow shorts? Really guys, can we please not do that.

    Let us be glad that bike racing sponsorships have not taken the turn
    that has put interesting paint jobs on some NASCAR entries.

    The white, yellow and light blue shorts are quite enough. I'd rather see a bike
    racer with a Jeff Gordon color scheme than Junior Johnson in yellow lycra.

    Ron

  8. Ozark Bicycle said:

    Some interesting stuff here regarding the helmet market and helmet
    marketing trends since 1993:

    http://tinyurl.com/nfkrt

    I haven't explored the other stuff on this site and, hence, have no
    comment.

    LOL at the wood-effect helmet for 2006. Maybe wood-effect TVs will be
    back in again soon.

  9. On Mon, 01 May 2006 13:19:45 GMT, RonSonic <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:58:36 GMT, Werehatrack <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Let us be glad that bike racing sponsorships have not taken the turn
    that has put interesting paint jobs on some NASCAR entries.

    The white, yellow and light blue shorts are quite enough. I'd rather see a bike
    racer with a Jeff Gordon color scheme than Junior Johnson in yellow lycra.

    And then there was that driver who briefly got handed a coverall from
    P&G's marketing folks; it would have been better if the product had
    been Tide.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.