Has anyone besides Savoldelli ever won a Grand Tour

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

The penultimate stage saw Savoldelli get dropped for 2:30 on the
penultimate climb by Simoni/DiLuca/Rujano, but Savoldelli's descending
skills brought together the remnants of the early break and the final,
shallow climb saw the larger group bring back all but 1 minute of that
gap to preserve Savoldelli's lead.

Can anyone recall someone winning a GT like this because of descending
skills? The only other race where I can recall descending skills being
a decisive factor was the 1991 Milan-San Remo when Kelly caught
Argentin on the descent of the Poggio.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Arguably, Eddy Merckx in 1972.

Kurgan Gringioni said:

K. Gringioni.

I'm sure I read about at least one or two other TdF winners that used
their descent skills to win. Wasn't it Aimar or Pingeon that minimized
the time loss in descents?

I'm sure someone can correct me🙂

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

The penultimate stage saw Savoldelli get dropped for 2:30 on the
penultimate climb by Simoni/DiLuca/Rujano, but Savoldelli's descending
skills brought together the remnants of the early break and the final,
shallow climb saw the larger group bring back all but 1 minute of that
gap to preserve Savoldelli's lead.

Can anyone recall someone winning a GT like this because of descending
skills? The only other race where I can recall descending skills being
a decisive factor was the 1991 Milan-San Remo when Kelly caught
Argentin on the descent of the Poggio.

There are several examples. For instance, Fiorenzo Magni, of of the best
descenders ever ("When I'm pinning the race number I forget I am mortal"😉,
in the stage to Bolzano in the Giro of 1951 (beating Van Steenbergen not in
the climb, but in the descent). One of the most sensational is the Tour 1964
when in the stage Andorra-Toulouse Anquetil lost 4 minutes to Poulidor in
the climb of the Envilira. There was a thick fog and everybody was
descending very cautiously, except Anquetil, who was descending which such a
speed than nobody even dared to take his wheel. In the valley he had already
overtaken Poulidor (who because of bad-luck even lost almost tthree minutes
in the last kilometers). On the other hand, in spite of his descending
skills Anquetil in the descent of the Gavia (not yet paved) he almost lost
the Giro 1960 to Gastone Nencini ("For Gastone the descent was what the
violin was for Paganini"😉, losing in one of the most impressive descents
ever no less that 3'34" to the Italian. Unfortunately for Nencini, in the
last few miles on the flat, Anquetil suddenly got help from some other
Italians (Lires? French francs? Swiss francs? Dollars? Who knows?) and at
the finish Nencini's lead was reduced to 2'30", which was not enough - he
needed 28 seconds more.

Benjo

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

The penultimate stage saw Savoldelli get dropped for 2:30 on the
penultimate climb by Simoni/DiLuca/Rujano, but Savoldelli's descending
skills brought together the remnants of the early break and the final,
shallow climb saw the larger group bring back all but 1 minute of that
gap to preserve Savoldelli's lead.

Can anyone recall someone winning a GT like this because of descending
skills? The only other race where I can recall descending skills being
a decisive factor was the 1991 Milan-San Remo when Kelly caught
Argentin on the descent of the Poggio.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Roberto Heras*, 2005 Vuelta, Stage 15, La Colladiella

Kurgan Gringioni said:

because of descending skills?

Heras last year in the Vuelta, although he then lost it and there were other
skills involved.

In 1987, Roche took 21 seconds on the yellow jersey Delgado down the Joux-Plane,
thanks to his teammate Schepers deliberately letting a gap open and obstructing
the chase. Eventually those seconds were not as decisive, as the Irish easilly
beat Delgado in the final TT to take the victory by a margin of 40".

Jenko

trg said:

Roberto Heras*, 2005 Vuelta, Stage 15, La Colladiella

Talking about rainy descents in Asturias, there's the stage towards the
Alto del Naranco where Rominger seized the 1993 Vuelta, based not so
much on his descending skills but on his main rival lack of them. Zülle
lost 44" that day and ended the race at only 29".

Jenko

Kurgan Gringioni said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

In the 2002 Giro, on stage 6 to Varazze where Jens Heppner
was in the break and took the pink jersey, there was a wet
descent to the finish. The favorites in the main bunch took
it a little easy, but Savoldelli slipped off the front, and nobody
appeared to regard him as a threat. He finished well back
of the break but got 44 seconds on the main bunch.
His winning margin over Tyler Hamilton was 1:41, so
that descent wasn't the decider, but a significant chunk
of the time gap. He also put a few seconds on the other
contenders and got a 2nd place time bonus on stage 16
to Corvara in Badia with a descent that was amazing to watch.

Let's not forget Savoldelli is no mean climber either, on a good day...
didn't he take a mountain top finish as well, pipping Basso to the line in
the last Giro?

I'd love to see a descending shootout between Savoldelli and Samuel Sanchez
sometime.

Alexander
"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

The penultimate stage saw Savoldelli get dropped for 2:30 on the
penultimate climb by Simoni/DiLuca/Rujano, but Savoldelli's descending
skills brought together the remnants of the early break and the final,
shallow climb saw the larger group bring back all but 1 minute of that
gap to preserve Savoldelli's lead.

Can anyone recall someone winning a GT like this because of descending
skills? The only other race where I can recall descending skills being
a decisive factor was the 1991 Milan-San Remo when Kelly caught
Argentin on the descent of the Poggio.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Alexander Lackner said:

Let's not forget Savoldelli is no mean climber either, on a good day...
didn't he take a mountain top finish as well, pipping Basso to the line in
the last Giro?

Dumbass -

That was the stage to Zoldo Alto. He dropped Simoni, DiLuca and Basso
on the descent. Basso went into the red to get up to Savoldelli,
dropping Simoni and DiLuca in the process. Advantage: Salvodelli,
because he was able to ride within himself. Then he drafted Basso the
rest of the way up and took him at the line.

Basso had incentive to ride that way because he was in pink at the
time. Obviously Savoldelli is a good climber, but I doubt that he would
have been able to win that stage if he didn't have the head start into
the climb.

I like his style because he's makes full use of all his talents and the
dropping everyone on the descent tactic is something that hardly anyone
can do. Plus he always sprays the podium girls with champagne.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

benjo maso said:

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

The penultimate stage saw Savoldelli get dropped for 2:30 on the
penultimate climb by Simoni/DiLuca/Rujano, but Savoldelli's descending
skills brought together the remnants of the early break and the final,
shallow climb saw the larger group bring back all but 1 minute of that
gap to preserve Savoldelli's lead.

Can anyone recall someone winning a GT like this because of descending
skills? The only other race where I can recall descending skills being
a decisive factor was the 1991 Milan-San Remo when Kelly caught
Argentin on the descent of the Poggio.

There are several examples. For instance, Fiorenzo Magni, of of the best
descenders ever ("When I'm pinning the race number I forget I am mortal"😉,
in the stage to Bolzano in the Giro of 1951 (beating Van Steenbergen not in
the climb, but in the descent). One of the most sensational is the Tour 1964
when in the stage Andorra-Toulouse Anquetil lost 4 minutes to Poulidor in
the climb of the Envilira. There was a thick fog and everybody was
descending very cautiously, except Anquetil, who was descending which such a
speed than nobody even dared to take his wheel. In the valley he had already
overtaken Poulidor (who because of bad-luck even lost almost tthree minutes
in the last kilometers). On the other hand, in spite of his descending
skills Anquetil in the descent of the Gavia (not yet paved) he almost lost
the Giro 1960 to Gastone Nencini ("For Gastone the descent was what the
violin was for Paganini"😉, losing in one of the most impressive descents
ever no less that 3'34" to the Italian. Unfortunately for Nencini, in the
last few miles on the flat, Anquetil suddenly got help from some other
Italians (Lires? French francs? Swiss francs? Dollars? Who knows?) and at
the finish Nencini's lead was reduced to 2'30", which was not enough - he
needed 28 seconds more.

Dumbass -

I suppose the only place to read about these exploits is in one of your
books?

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

benjo maso said:

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

The penultimate stage saw Savoldelli get dropped for 2:30 on the
penultimate climb by Simoni/DiLuca/Rujano, but Savoldelli's descending
skills brought together the remnants of the early break and the final,
shallow climb saw the larger group bring back all but 1 minute of that
gap to preserve Savoldelli's lead.

Can anyone recall someone winning a GT like this because of descending
skills? The only other race where I can recall descending skills being
a decisive factor was the 1991 Milan-San Remo when Kelly caught
Argentin on the descent of the Poggio.

There are several examples. For instance, Fiorenzo Magni, of of the best
descenders ever ("When I'm pinning the race number I forget I am
mortal"😉,
in the stage to Bolzano in the Giro of 1951 (beating Van Steenbergen not
in
the climb, but in the descent). One of the most sensational is the Tour
1964
when in the stage Andorra-Toulouse Anquetil lost 4 minutes to Poulidor in
the climb of the Envilira. There was a thick fog and everybody was
descending very cautiously, except Anquetil, who was descending which
such a
speed than nobody even dared to take his wheel. In the valley he had
already
overtaken Poulidor (who because of bad-luck even lost almost tthree
minutes
in the last kilometers). On the other hand, in spite of his descending
skills Anquetil in the descent of the Gavia (not yet paved) he almost
lost
the Giro 1960 to Gastone Nencini ("For Gastone the descent was what the
violin was for Paganini"😉, losing in one of the most impressive descents
ever no less that 3'34" to the Italian. Unfortunately for Nencini, in the
last few miles on the flat, Anquetil suddenly got help from some other
Italians (Lires? French francs? Swiss francs? Dollars? Who knows?) and at
the finish Nencini's lead was reduced to 2'30", which was not enough - he
needed 28 seconds more.

Dumbass -

I suppose the only place to read about these exploits is in one of your
books?

No, I'm afraid I don't mention them in one my books on bicycle racing (I've
written only two). About the Giro 1951 I've heard from Rik Van Steenbergen
himself. He also told me that the night before, Magni had offered him a lot
of lires to bribe him, but - contrary to his usual practice - he had
refused, being convinced thinking Magni couldn't drop him in the climb
(which he couldn't), but Rik just didn't have the nerve and the technique to
descend as fast as Magni, who was really a virtuoso (in 1951 Wim van Est was
following Magni in the descent of the Aubisque, until a certain bend which
Magni could take and Wim not (so he fell into a ravine). About the Envilera
and the Gavia can be find in several books about Anquetil (Roger Bastide's
for instance). In the Gavia also in Riccardo Nencini's excellent book on his
uncle Gastone: "Il giallo e il rosa" (the quote on Paganini is from that
book).

Benjo

Kurgan Gringioni said:

because of descending skills?

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro. In the stage to Zoldo Alto, he dropped the other three
major contenders on the final descent and Basso went ballistic on the
subsequent final climb to bridge the gap. Simoni blew, it was worth 21
seconds there and one minute one second to DiLuca.

The penultimate stage saw Savoldelli get dropped for 2:30 on the
penultimate climb by Simoni/DiLuca/Rujano, but Savoldelli's descending
skills brought together the remnants of the early break and the final,
shallow climb saw the larger group bring back all but 1 minute of that
gap to preserve Savoldelli's lead.

Can anyone recall someone winning a GT like this because of descending
skills? The only other race where I can recall descending skills being
a decisive factor was the 1991 Milan-San Remo when Kelly caught
Argentin on the descent of the Poggio.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Savoldelli didn't win because he descended well, he won because he
didn't try to climb with the pure climbers. He had the patience and
maturity to climb within his limits rather than digging too deep and
blowing up. He didn't lose too much time, and he made it up on the
descents. If he'd blown, and lost huge chunks of time, he wouldn't
have been able to make it up on the descents. It was pacing, not
descending, that allowed him to win.

Fred

Quoted message said:

In the 2002 Giro,... He also put a few seconds on the other
contenders and got a 2nd place time bonus on stage 16
to Corvara in Badia with a descent that was amazing to watch.

I believe I saw that ride. He left zero margin for error on those
hairpin turns. Sadly, it seems it's not available on DVD, or VHS.

--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999,

Kurgan Gringioni said:

Quoted message said:

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro.

fred.garvin said:

Savoldelli didn't win because he descended well, he won because he
didn't try to climb with the pure climbers. He had the patience and
maturity to climb within his limits rather than digging too deep and
blowing up.

But if he wasn't such a good descender he would not have won regardless of
how well he paced himself.

benjo maso said:

No, I'm afraid I don't mention them in one my books on bicycle racing (I've
written only two). About the Giro 1951 I've heard from Rik Van Steenbergen
himself. He also told me that the night before, Magni had offered him a lot
of lires to bribe him, but - contrary to his usual practice - he had
refused, being convinced thinking Magni couldn't drop him in the climb
(which he couldn't), but Rik just didn't have the nerve and the technique to
descend as fast as Magni, who was really a virtuoso (in 1951 Wim van Est was
following Magni in the descent of the Aubisque, until a certain bend which
Magni could take and Wim not (so he fell into a ravine). About the Envilera
and the Gavia can be find in several books about Anquetil (Roger Bastide's
for instance). In the Gavia also in Riccardo Nencini's excellent book on his
uncle Gastone: "Il giallo e il rosa" (the quote on Paganini is from that
book).

Thanks. Who said rbr is not worth reading now and then.

Quoted message said:

Savoldelli didn't win because he descended well, he won because he
didn't try to climb with the pure climbers. He had the patience and
maturity to climb within his limits rather than digging too deep and
blowing up. He didn't lose too much time, and he made it up on the
descents. If he'd blown, and lost huge chunks of time, he wouldn't
have been able to make it up on the descents. It was pacing, not
descending, that allowed him to win.

Question for those that know more than I do: how much does blowing up
on the climb impair a descender going down? Just wondering, knowing
that I'm definitely not as safe if I descend when hammered - but it
generally isn't an issue whether I ride the brake levers or not.

I've seen a few adrenaline-impaired descents almost go over a stone
wall, so there must be some impact.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

Kurgan Gringioni said:

because of descending skills?

Your pal Lemond with his alleged 70 mph descent of the Tourmalet in the
1990 TdF.

Donald Munro said:

Kurgan Gringioni said:

Quoted message said:

One can make a very convincing argument that if Savoldelli did not
possess his awesome descending skills, he would not have won last
year's Giro.

fred.garvin said:

Savoldelli didn't win because he descended well, he won because he
didn't try to climb with the pure climbers. He had the patience and
maturity to climb within his limits rather than digging too deep and
blowing up.

But if he wasn't such a good descender he would not have won regardless of
how well he paced himself.

Not really. He could've perhaps ridden just a tiny bit harder, losing
a little less time on the climb, and therefore wouldn't have needed to
descend as well as he does.

I'll admit, one thing that may contribute to his willingness to watch
the leaders ride away from him on the climbs, resisting the urge to
follow at all costs, is the confidence he has that he can probably
catch them on the way down.

Anyway, it's a chicken v. egg sort of thing, I guess. If hadn't paced
well, he'd have lost more time, if he paced even better and lost a
little less time on the way up, he wouldn't have needed to descend as
well.

The impressive thing, I think, is that he shows the maturity NOT to
ride above his limits, whether uphill or downhill.

Fred

Anybody else notice that Henry was ALMOST human there for a second?