Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Question: is a 34/50 compact crank to small to work well on flats using a nine speed 12/26 cog?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 49 posts · 1,732 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 May 2006
Last activity
31 May 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
49
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,732
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 49
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Guys,

    Question is a 34/50 compact crank to small to work well on flats using
    a nine speed 12/26 cog?

    We have healthy hills in the Ozarks, but certainly not "Alpine"
    inclines.

    Randolf

  2. Quoted message said:

    Guys,

    Question is a 34/50 compact crank to small to work well on flats using
    a nine speed 12/26 cog?

    A 50/12 is a 112 inch gear. Seems plenty long, unless you're racing in
    fast company.

    Quoted message said:

    We have healthy hills in the Ozarks, but certainly not "Alpine"
    inclines.

    What area of the Ozarks do you ride in?

  3. Western...you have a bike shop or something?

  4. Quoted message said:

    Guys,

    Question is a 34/50 compact crank to small to work well on flats using
    a nine speed 12/26 cog?

    We have healthy hills in the Ozarks, but certainly not "Alpine"
    inclines.

    Randolf

    Do the math. Gear inches * RPM / 336.3 = MPH.

    50/12*26.5 = 110.4 gear inches. * 90 RPM (a nice all day long day
    after day spin) = 9,937.5 / 336.3 (constant from working through the
    formulas of how far one wheel revolution takes you) = 29.55 MPH.
    Unless you are wind and gravity helped, I doubt any besides
    professional racers can maintain that pace for more than a mile or two.
    Go up to 100 RPM, easily maintained for a long time, and you get a top
    speed of 32.83 MPH. Moving pretty fast there. Go up to 110 RPM,
    easily held for many minutes by anyone who can actually turn big gears,
    and you get 36.12 MPH. Take it up to 120 RPM, you can spin this for
    several minutes, and you get a speed of 39.40 MPH. Unless you are
    going down a mountain you won't be riding 39.40 MPH for very long.

    On the low end you have a 34x26. 34.65 gear inches. Pedaling 70 RPM
    up a long climb and you are moving at 7.21 MPH.

    I presume you currently ride a bicycle. With a cyclocomputer. Look at
    your speeds during your ride and what gear you are in. Then go home
    and figure up what your RPM was. Figure up how often you ride in the
    highest gears.

  5. Ozark Bicycle said:
    Quoted message said:

    Guys,

    Question is a 34/50 compact crank to small to work well on flats using
    a nine speed 12/26 cog?

    A 50/12 is a 112 inch gear. Seems plenty long, unless you're racing in
    fast company.

    Anything bigger than 50-12 would only be needed were you a fast
    sprinter who lost races because you didn't have a big enough gear.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    We have healthy hills in the Ozarks, but certainly not "Alpine"
    inclines.

    If you have long descents you may occasionally wish you had a bigger
    gear than 50-12, but that would not be often. Anyway there is always a
    descent somewhere that could make use of a bigger gear than what anyone
    might have on their bike. I think 34-50, 12-26 is a perfect combo for
    rolling to semi-steep hills. It is what I recommend to my friends who
    ask my opinion on that sort of thing. I personally use 39-53, 12-25 but
    that is only because I like a low cadence.

    Joseph

  6. Quoted message said:

    is a 34/50 compact crank to small to work well on flats using
    a nine speed 12/26 cog?

    Looks like approx 3 rpm pedal cadence per 1mph in 50/12 with 700c wheel
    and 23mm tire. So how fast do you go, and and how fast do you pedal?

    50/12 examples:
    20mph - 60rpm
    30mph - 90rpm
    40mph - 120rpm

  7. Actually 80rpm is where I can hold it for as long as I'm awake. I've
    tree trunk legs...low rpms seems to make me more efficent. So, to hold
    30mph for an hour I need something like 52/11? Wish I had a flat track
    to see how long I could hold it.

    Randolf

  8. <snip q and comments re 50/12 and flats>

    I am happy with my 50/13 on the flats. I am a partially reformed
    grinder. I also purchased an 11/23 which I used for a bit but will now
    only put on for the flattest rides.

    D'ohBoy

  9. Commuting five days a week 5.5 miles each way average 24mph on the
    flats. Though there are hills which slow me down. Currently though I
    ride 52/14 gearing on top and 42/28 on bottom.

    Randolf

  10. Maybe I'd be better served with a 53/39 and a 12-26 cog?

    Randolf

  11. Quoted message said:

    Western...you have a bike shop or something?

    I run a bike service facility. Maintenance/service, repairs, mods,
    "updates", etc. I don't sell bikes.

    "Western"? Where?

  12. Quoted message said:

    Maybe I'd be better served with a 53/39 and a 12-26 cog?

    Are you looking for a lower low, a higher high, or both? (FWIW, a 39/26
    is the same low as a 42/28, so you'd be spending money for two new
    chainrings and a new cassette solely to get a higher high. A 53/12 is
    pretty high gear, how often would you use it?)

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    Question is a 34/50 compact crank to small to work well on flats
    using a nine speed 12/26 cog?

    We have healthy hills in the Ozarks, but certainly not "Alpine"

    No. Unless you are racing and need to be able to sprint at 40 mph.

    I use a 48/34 crank with an 11-28 cassette on my brevet bike. I can
    ride over 35 mph in the 48 x 11 (which is about the same as a 52 x 12),
    but I really never have reason to do so.

    Modern road bikes are generally geared for racing, for marketing
    reasons, with gears that relatively few people can use effectively. I
    think that's one of the reasons that most of the bikes you see being
    ridden by normal people are hybrids. BIke makers could sell more road
    bikes if they'd stop confusing "road bike" with "race bike."

  14. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    Maybe I'd be better served with a 53/39 and a 12-26 cog?

    Probably not.

  15. Quoted message said:

    Actually 80rpm is where I can hold it for as long as I'm awake. I've
    tree trunk legs...low rpms seems to make me more efficent. So, to hold
    30mph for an hour I need something like 52/11? Wish I had a flat track
    to see how long I could hold it.

    Randolf

    30 MPH for an hour? Oh my! Jan Ullrich raced the 50 km flat time
    trial in the Giro today at 51.02 kmh (31.8 mph), 58 minutes, 48
    seconds. Pretty close to an hour.

    30 MPH * 336.3 constant / 80 RPM = 126.11 Gear Inches

    52x11 = 125.27 gear inches
    53x11 = 127.68 gear inches

  16. I think I'm sold on a 50/34 using a 12-26 cog. Best of both worlds...a
    little lower gear for those mean hills and a little more high for
    coming down the backside. Unfortunelately I never get to pedal down
    hill cause there are always stop lights at the bottom of each hill 🙁

    Now if I could only find a XL compact frame with 50/34 chain wheel and
    a 12-26 cog with at least a 105 derailure. I'd be in hog heaven 🙂

    Randolf

  17. Hmmmm...anyone knows where I can get some steriods? I know I could do
    it if I doped for a year or two.

    Randolf

  18. Quoted message said:

    Hmmmm...anyone knows where I can get some steriods? I know I could do
    it if I doped for a year or two.

    Do what?

  19. Steroids...juicing...doping. Think I could be fast if I had some
    chemical enhancement.

  20. Even better doping and training while listening to Slayer!!! I'd beat
    Jan Ullrich or die trying 🙂

    Randolf

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.