Road Cycling · Public discussion

Der Jan is back

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 20 posts · 776 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
18 May 2006
Last activity
21 May 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
776
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben

  2. Quoted message said:

    Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben


    It's that boundary layer inhibiting abdominal hump:
    http://www.velonews.com/images/int/9890.14795.f.jpg

  3. Quoted message said:

    Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?

  4. Quoted message said:

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Rasmussen is a good candidate to join him. He is
    now 50 minutes back. That means if he decides to
    test his legs in the mountains no one will be too
    concerned by it.

    Bob Schwartz

  5. Robert Chung said:


    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?

    He may have been assisted by a tailwind the whole course. Wind was
    coming from the East during the morning and from the West at the end of
    the TT. Did Ullrich benefit from the transition?
    http://usuarios.lycos.es/jenko/pontedera.png

    I don't think so. But Pinotti certainly did.

    Jenko

  6. Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?

    Plot a graph, and if he's outwith 2 std deviations of the mean, I'll buy
    you a coffee.

  7. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?


    Climbing come July??

  8. Robert Chung said:

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    Somehow, I just *knew* someone would say that... 🙂

    ~bob

  9. Bob Schwartz said:
    Quoted message said:

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Rasmussen is a good candidate to join him. He is
    now 50 minutes back. That means if he decides to
    test his legs in the mountains no one will be too
    concerned by it.


    Rasmussen will not start tomorrow.

    --
    Slet transportmidlet før dk
    __o
    Poul Erik Lindaa === _'\ <_ E-mail: [email hidden]
    ==== (¤)/ (¤)
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    http://skivsamling.nu/show.pl?id=26228

  10. Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?

    Please, oh please, tell me you were being sarcastic.

    The better question is who knew Ivan could TT like that?

    Fred

  11. Quoted message said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!
    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?

    Please, oh please, tell me you were being sarcastic.
    The better question is who knew Ivan could TT like that?

    Fred

    Somebody's been hangin' out in the wind tunnel! 🙂

    ~bob

  12. Stu Fleming said:

    Plot a graph, and if he's outwith 2 std deviations of the mean, I'll buy
    you a coffee.

    To be consumed using the rear orifice ?


  13. Quoted message said:


    Please, oh please, tell me you were being sarcastic.

    The better question is who knew Ivan could TT like that?

    Fred

    *Bangs head on Keyboard*

    Actually all those who have been following profesional cycling know
    this...

    Last year he WON the TT in the Giro (not as long) and scored a whopping
    5th in the final TT of the TdF (wich was considering the competition
    just as good as this 2nd spot).

    He won a few other TT's and Couple-TT's as well.

  14. Donald Munro said:
    Stu Fleming said:

    Plot a graph, and if he's outwith 2 std deviations of the mean, I'll buy
    you a coffee.

    To be consumed using the rear orifice ?

    I'm still trying to figure out what or who Stu means when he says "the
    mean". If he'll accept me and my buddies as the mean, I'm pretty sure
    Jan would finish 2+ std deviations ahead of the mean with one leg cut
    off. If Stu is talking about the time trial at the Giro yesterday, I
    don't have to plot anything to know that Ullrich was 3+ std deviations
    ahead of the mean. Although, given the sample size, the .1% included in
    the 4th quartile isn't big enough to hold all of Jan Ullrich. So we
    have to cut his leg off again to fit him in. Don't feel bad for him
    though. He had a chance to lose the weight before he showed up and...

  15. Tim Lines said:
    Donald Munro said:
    Stu Fleming said:

    Plot a graph, and if he's outwith 2 std deviations of the mean, I'll
    buy you a coffee.

    To be consumed using the rear orifice ?

    I'm still trying to figure out what or who Stu means when he says "the
    mean". If he'll accept me and my buddies as the mean, I'm pretty sure
    Jan would finish 2+ std deviations ahead of the mean with one leg cut
    off. If Stu is talking about the time trial at the Giro yesterday, I
    don't have to plot anything to know that Ullrich was 3+ std deviations
    ahead of the mean. Although, given the sample size, the .1% included in
    the 4th quartile isn't big enough to hold all of Jan Ullrich. So we
    have to cut his leg off again to fit him in. Don't feel bad for him
    though. He had a chance to lose the weight before he showed up and...

    OK, I did the math. Ullrich was at -2.83 standard deviations for time
    (compared to the TT finishing times of all the riders). Taking the
    average speeds of all the riders, Ullrich was at +3.07 standard
    deviations (different number since time -> speed is a nonlinear
    transformation).

    Data taken from cyclingnew's results page.

    Mark

  16. Mark Janeba said:
    Tim Lines said:
    Donald Munro said:

    Stu Fleming wrote:

    > Plot a graph, and if he's outwith 2 std deviations of the mean, I'll
    > buy you a coffee.

    To be consumed using the rear orifice ?

    I'm still trying to figure out what or who Stu means when he says "the
    mean". If he'll accept me and my buddies as the mean, I'm pretty sure
    Jan would finish 2+ std deviations ahead of the mean with one leg cut
    off. If Stu is talking about the time trial at the Giro yesterday, I
    don't have to plot anything to know that Ullrich was 3+ std deviations
    ahead of the mean. Although, given the sample size, the .1% included
    in the 4th quartile isn't big enough to hold all of Jan Ullrich. So
    we have to cut his leg off again to fit him in. Don't feel bad for him
    though. He had a chance to lose the weight before he showed up and...

    OK, I did the math. Ullrich was at -2.83 standard deviations for time
    (compared to the TT finishing times of all the riders). Taking the
    average speeds of all the riders, Ullrich was at +3.07 standard
    deviations (different number since time -> speed is a nonlinear
    transformation).

    I was just doing intuitive stuff, picturing a bell curve and knowing
    that Ullrich was crammed way up against the right end, knowing that the
    fourth quartile is small and the sample size is relatively small too. So
    I was just making stuff up. From your math, I surmise that .17 of
    Ullrich is hanging out of that fourth quartile and into the third. So
    it's probably not his entire leg. Probably only a couple toes.

    Thanks for taking me seriously, it happens so rarely.

  17. Mark Janeba said:

    OK, I did the math. Ullrich was at -2.83 standard deviations for time
    (compared to the TT finishing times of all the riders). Taking the
    average speeds of all the riders, Ullrich was at +3.07 standard
    deviations (different number since time -> speed is a nonlinear
    transformation).

    Data taken from cyclingnew's results page.

    Mark

    Isn't speed = distance / time? Seems linear to me.

    Dave

  18. Nobody said:
    Mark Janeba said:

    OK, I did the math. Ullrich was at -2.83 standard deviations for time
    (compared to the TT finishing times of all the riders). Taking the
    average speeds of all the riders, Ullrich was at +3.07 standard
    deviations (different number since time -> speed is a nonlinear
    transformation).

    Data taken from cyclingnew's results page.

    Mark

    Isn't speed = distance / time? Seems linear to me.

    Dave

    Your formula is correct, your conclusion is wrong.

    [Average] speed and *distance* are related by a linear transformation.
    Speed and *time* are related by an inverse proportionality. (That's why
    time is in the denominator).

    Repeatedly adding a fixed amount to the time does *not* reduce the
    resulting speed by a fixed amount, though it's close over the range of
    (time,speed) data we see in the Giro TT. That makes the transformation
    nonlinear.

    To put it a different way, if you graph time versus speed (for a fixed
    distance), the graph is not a line, though again, it's close for the
    narrow range of times/speeds we see in this dataset. This *approximate*
    linearity is why the two numbers in the original post are close to each
    other.

    Mark

  19. Stu Fleming said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!

    Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    having won stages in all three Grand Tours.

    Ben

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?

    Plot a graph, and if he's outwith 2 std deviations of the mean, I'll buy
    you a coffee.

    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/giro06-11.png

  20. Robert Chung said:
    Stu Fleming said:
    Robert Chung said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    >Tremble, Masters Fatties! Der Kaiser fahrt zuruck!
    >
    >Jan Ullrich has now caught up to David Zabriskie,
    >having won stages in all three Grand Tours.
    >
    >Ben

    Who knew that Jan could TT like that?

    51 kph, hmmm. La puissance d'Ullrich: est-elle humainement possible?

    Plot a graph, and if he's outwith 2 std deviations of the mean, I'll buy
    you a coffee.

    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/giro06-11.png

    Gianni Bugno will be in touch regarding the cup of coffee.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.