Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

short legs & long torso

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 15 posts · 678 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 June 2006
Last activity
3 June 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
678
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

  2. email hidden said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Dear Stan,

    http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  3. Thanks Carl, truly a practical suggestion but what saddle would you
    suggest?
    S.

    Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Dear Stan,

    http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  4. Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Dear Stan,

    http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Dear Carl,

    Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
    It is possible to discern
    ass from elbow.

    Keep trying, boy!

    Cheers,
    Oz

  5. Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Dear Stan,

    http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Dear Carl,

    Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
    It is possible to discern
    ass from elbow.

    Keep trying, boy!

    Cheers,
    Oz

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_thread/thread/b6d951373d37c12/c4cfd58ae0eac3c0?q=ozark+liar+breached&rnum=1#c4cfd58ae0eac3c0

  6. email hidden said:

    Thanks Carl, truly a practical suggestion but what saddle would you
    suggest?
    S.

    Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Dear Stan,

    http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Dear Stan,

    Obviously, the saddle should be something a little more racy:

    http://www.saddlery.biz/pp/Horse_Racing_Equipment/Jockeys_Equipment/Racing_Saddle,_4-6lb.html

    (Personally, I use red steel Schwinn 1998 Le Tours, which are
    available now and then on eBay for around $200 in sizes from 52cm to
    58cm. The shorter ones hang from the rafters and serve as organ
    donors. I just switched about two weeks ago to a new one with a larger
    frame and didn't bother to change the seats.)

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    On 1 Jun 2006 18:30:05 -0700, "[email hidden]"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    >and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    >take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    >for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    >racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    >steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    >I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    >straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Dear Stan,

    http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Dear Carl,

    Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
    It is possible to discern
    ass from elbow.

    Keep trying, boy!

    Cheers,
    Oz

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_thread/thread/b6d951373d37c12/c4cfd58ae0eac3c0?q=ozark+liar+breached&rum=1#c4cfd58ae0eac3c0

    Ah, another fallacious Fogel-link!
    Is that your best shot? Is that really what you got?
    Have you forwarded any more private emails to third parties this week,
    Smarmy one?

  8. boys boys can't we all just get along. Please a little decorum.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    [email hidden] wrote:
    > On 1 Jun 2006 18:30:05 -0700, "[email hidden]"
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    > >and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    > >take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    > >for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    > >racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    > >steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    > >I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    > >straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?
    >
    > Dear Stan,
    >
    > http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > Carl Fogel

    Dear Carl,

    Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
    It is possible to discern
    ass from elbow.

    Keep trying, boy!

    Cheers,
    Oz

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_thread/thread/b6d951373d37c12/c4cfd58ae0eac3c0?q=ozark+liar+breached&rum=1#c4cfd58ae0eac3c0

    Ah, another fallacious Fogel-link!
    Is that your best shot? Is that really what you got?
    Have you forwarded any more private emails to third parties this week,
    Smarmy one?

  9. Quoted message said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Waterford -14 series...all made to order, frames in the 3.3 pound
    range, well made, all custom. $1300 for the frame.

  10. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    Waterford -14 series...all made to order, frames in the 3.3 pound
    range, well made, all custom. $1300 for the frame.

    Interesting you should mention the Waterford -14 series. I fit almost
    exactly the same size as the OP, & that is the top bike I'm
    considering. Not because I think that Waterford has any lock on my size
    as a custom bike, in particular. I just like their design & price in
    general.

    John

  11. [email hidden said:

    "]This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
    Get a Kona Sutra
    konaworld.comproduct detail.aspx

  12. looks interesting
    thanks for the tip
    any info on guarantee? I have a history of breaking frames
    Stan

    waxbytes said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
    Get a Kona Sutra
    http://tinyurl.com/r7azg

    --
    waxbytes

  13. waxbytes said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
    Get a Kona Sutra
    http://tinyurl.com/r7azg

    --
    waxbytes

    No top tube measurement and more $ than a Waterford makes me wonder why
    a 'off shore' made frame is this gents 'answer.

  14. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:


    waxbytes said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
    and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
    take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
    for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
    racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
    steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
    I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
    straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?

    You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
    Get a Kona Sutra
    http://tinyurl.com/r7azg
    --
    waxbytes

    No top tube measurement and more $ than a Waterford makes me wonder why
    a 'off shore' made frame is this gents 'answer.

    Ah, Peter, you were looking at the complete bike price; the frame alone
    is ca. US$400, way less than a Waterford. But you're right about the
    missing geometry charts; enquiring minds need to know...

    Cheers,
    Pann
    --
    geek by nature, Linux by choice L I N U X .~.
    The Choice /V\
    http://hardlink.ourmanpann.com/oss/ of a GNU /( )\
    Generation ^^-^^

  15. Quoted message said:

    looks interesting
    thanks for the tip
    any info on guarantee? I have a history of breaking frames
    Stan
    waxbytes wrote:

    Dear Stan, & list:

    You have the classic dachshund body. I just put up a piece on your
    sort of problem on

    www.63xc.com

    the off-raod fixie 'zine. You could get a custom build - there are
    builders around who will make up a 3 1/2 pound steel frame in your size
    under $1000. An alternative might be to find a nice light mountain
    frame, like an early Bontrager, and have the headtube cut loose and
    rebrazed to the angle you want.

    good luck

    jn

    "Thursday"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.