This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
short legs & long torso
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 2 June 2006
- Last activity
- 3 June 2006
- Original author
- Email address hidden
- Posts
- 15
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 678
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
email hidden said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Dear Stan,
http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
-
Thanks Carl, truly a practical suggestion but what saddle would you
suggest?
S.Quoted message said:
email hidden said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Dear Stan,
http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
-
Quoted message said:
email hidden said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Dear Stan,
http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
Dear Carl,
Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
It is possible to discern
ass from elbow.Keep trying, boy!
Cheers,
Oz -
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
email hidden said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Dear Stan,
http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
Dear Carl,
Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
It is possible to discern
ass from elbow.Keep trying, boy!
Cheers,
Oz -
email hidden said:
Thanks Carl, truly a practical suggestion but what saddle would you
suggest?
S.Quoted message said:
email hidden said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Dear Stan,
http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
Dear Stan,
Obviously, the saddle should be something a little more racy:
http://www.saddlery.biz/pp/Horse_Racing_Equipment/Jockeys_Equipment/Racing_Saddle,_4-6lb.html
(Personally, I use red steel Schwinn 1998 Le Tours, which are
available now and then on eBay for around $200 in sizes from 52cm to
58cm. The shorter ones hang from the rafters and serve as organ
donors. I just switched about two weeks ago to a new one with a larger
frame and didn't bother to change the seats.)Cheers,
Carl Fogel
-
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
On 1 Jun 2006 18:30:05 -0700, "[email hidden]"
<[email hidden]> wrote:>This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
>and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
>take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
>for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
>racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
>steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
>I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
>straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Dear Stan,
http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
Dear Carl,
Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
It is possible to discern
ass from elbow.Keep trying, boy!
Cheers,
OzAh, another fallacious Fogel-link!
Is that your best shot? Is that really what you got?
Have you forwarded any more private emails to third parties this week,
Smarmy one? -
boys boys can't we all just get along. Please a little decorum.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] wrote:
> On 1 Jun 2006 18:30:05 -0700, "[email hidden]"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
> >and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
> >take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
> >for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
> >racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
> >steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
> >I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
> >straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?
>
> Dear Stan,
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/wsb/media/286143/graphic_pub.jpg
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carl FogelDear Carl,
Despite what Mama Fogel taught you,
It is possible to discern
ass from elbow.Keep trying, boy!
Cheers,
OzAh, another fallacious Fogel-link!
Is that your best shot? Is that really what you got?
Have you forwarded any more private emails to third parties this week,
Smarmy one? -
Quoted message said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Waterford -14 series...all made to order, frames in the 3.3 pound
range, well made, all custom. $1300 for the frame. -
Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
Quoted message said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?Waterford -14 series...all made to order, frames in the 3.3 pound
range, well made, all custom. $1300 for the frame.Interesting you should mention the Waterford -14 series. I fit almost
exactly the same size as the OP, & that is the top bike I'm
considering. Not because I think that Waterford has any lock on my size
as a custom bike, in particular. I just like their design & price in
general.John
-
[email hidden said:
"]This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
Get a Kona Sutra
konaworld.comproduct detail.aspxOpen ↗ -
looks interesting
thanks for the tip
any info on guarantee? I have a history of breaking frames
Stanwaxbytes said:
Quoted message said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
Get a Kona Sutra
http://tinyurl.com/r7azg--
waxbytes -
waxbytes said:
Quoted message said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
Get a Kona Sutra
http://tinyurl.com/r7azg--
waxbytesNo top tube measurement and more $ than a Waterford makes me wonder why
a 'off shore' made frame is this gents 'answer. -
Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
waxbytes said:
Quoted message said:
This is my own version of the 70's steel topic. I need a 59 top tube
and a 55/56 seat tube so much as I might like to I don't think I can
take advantage of old old steel stock.I just had a steel frame built
for comfort but it is heavy and i would like something a little more
racy without spending big bucks. ideally it would be a relaxed angles
steel frame but there is nothing I'm aware of of on the market. The way
I have dealt with this in the past is to get the biggests bike I can
straddle about 32,5 stand over height. Any suggestions?You sound like the type of person compact frame is designed for.
Get a Kona Sutra
http://tinyurl.com/r7azg
--
waxbytesNo top tube measurement and more $ than a Waterford makes me wonder why
a 'off shore' made frame is this gents 'answer.Ah, Peter, you were looking at the complete bike price; the frame alone
is ca. US$400, way less than a Waterford. But you're right about the
missing geometry charts; enquiring minds need to know...Cheers,
Pann
--
geek by nature, Linux by choice L I N U X .~.
The Choice /V\
http://hardlink.ourmanpann.com/oss/ of a GNU /( )\
Generation ^^-^^ -
Quoted message said:
looks interesting
thanks for the tip
any info on guarantee? I have a history of breaking frames
Stan
waxbytes wrote:Dear Stan, & list:
You have the classic dachshund body. I just put up a piece on your
sort of problem onwww.63xc.com
the off-raod fixie 'zine. You could get a custom build - there are
builders around who will make up a 3 1/2 pound steel frame in your size
under $1000. An alternative might be to find a nice light mountain
frame, like an early Bontrager, and have the headtube cut loose and
rebrazed to the angle you want.good luck
jn
"Thursday"
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.