Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: sshhhhh!

Started by jtaylor · · Last activity · 1 post · 289 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
15 June 2006
Last activity
15 June 2006
Original author
jtaylor
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
289
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Mark McNeill" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Response to Jim Price:

    Quoted message said:

    Given that some of the other places are US states, you would
    have thought that even a leftpondian might have been sensitive to that,
    but then he might be thinking of lawsuits.

    I wrote to the guy, and he wrote back: yes, he fears liability issues if
    ride organisers don't tell participants to wear a helmet. He also
    believes that helmets are intrinsically A Good Thing; but in this
    context he was not inclined to argue the point, and neither was I.

    This is foolish.

    Courts have held that there is no validity to any claim of liability from
    not wearing a foam hat while cycling.

    How frightened some cyclists have become of this activity - they even fear
    that others will find them to blame should the vanishingly small chance of a
    mishap come to pass. If it were not for the helmet promoters chasing mammon
    we would all be healthier, both physically and spiritually.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.