FRANK LOVERME said:I didn't realize, when I first came to this non site, the regulars,
for the most part, are cynics.
You end up hearing all sorts of things on USENET, and you have to
admit that your story is pretty unusual.
Quoted message said:Now, I'm beginning to see part of the picture. Had you asked me
direct questions, from the beginning, without alluding to my being a
"troll" (and I'm, still, not sure what that is) I would have
answered your questions, in detail.
Trolling is a type of fishing where flashy lures are pulled behind a
boat. The fisherman wait for a fish to strike and then reel in the
fish.
Some people approach USENET the same way. Instead of coming here to
promote discussion they are here to stir up debates. A common tactic
is to pose as a very unique individuals (say a blind man that has
broken every bone in his back lifting weights) and then either try and
cross the respondents in their words, or incite a heated debate (also
called a flame war). Now, I personally don't believe that you are a
troll, but I can understand why others would be skeptical.
Quoted message said:So far, I've had to defend my position, while trying to decide if
this is a worthwhile venue.
Defense is wasted on USENET. It's far better to simply cultivate a
sense of humor and a love of sarcasm. If there are folks that you
find aren't worth paying attention to the correct response is to learn
to use your software to filter their posts out.
Quoted message said:I contend, your Welcom Wagon lacks acceptance, and needs revamping.
Yeah, mfw is not warm and cuddly.
Quoted message said:Now, to my story: The user name you see on my shares is the one with
which I was born. I am 59 years young, and I am a survivor. As
I've said, in previous shares, I've had major setbacks, over the
past 10 years, and I suspect, this had a bit to do with my
development problems. Yes, I've been totally blind for longer than
most of you, I suspect, have been on this planet.
We call these messages "posts" not "shares." Thanks for sharing
though 🙂.
You would think, by the way we act, that most of us are punk kids.
Sadly, that's not necessarily the case. I also use my real name on
USENET. Most folks, however, don't.
Quoted message said:I began, trying to build my body at a time when publications were
limited and virtually inaccessible to the blind. I joined the first
spa in the early 70s and with each successive administration, was
given a different plan-none of which helped me toward my goal. Many
wasted hours of strenuous, painful routines rendered me little
improved.
OK, so what precisely have you tried? Generally speaking the folks
here will suggest that you use compound exercises like squats,
deadlifts, chinups, dips, etc. The set and rep schemes that you use,
the number of times per week that you exercise, and how you decide to
split up the exercises depend on goals, but if you have been doing
these sorts of exercises for 30 years without results then its
probably not your workout routine that's the problem.
Quoted message said:Yes, diet is probably one of the culprits. Only, on my workout days
am I strict about what goes into my mouth. For breakfast I have a
bran cereal with raisins and whole milk. , and for lunch a sandwich
of white bread and about 8 oz. of hard salami, followed by a large
bowl of pasta and vegetables. An hour later, I begin my
routine.After my workout, I eat at least 4 ozs of chicken, as I
understand we cannot assimilate more than 4 ozs. of protein, in one
digestion cycle.
I'm not a nutritional expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I
am pretty sure that you can assimilate more than 4 ozs. of protein at
a sitting.
Quoted message said:For the remainder of my day, I eat apples, celery and carrots, as
snacks. As I've said, before, I don't know the science involved in
the entire process. That's why I came to this non site. Any more
questions?
I would suggest adding more protein to your diet. Lots more protein.
Jason