Singlespeed · Public discussion

Track Crank Length

Started by Lasalles · · Last activity · 42 posts · 38,479 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Singlespeed
Published
19 May 2004
Last activity
16 July 2006
Original author
Lasalles
Posts
42
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
38,479
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–42 of 42
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. VeloFlash said:

    As there are no studies at maximal or supra maximal efforts there are no references to support a contrary view that there exists a greater metabolic demand at maximal plus efforts by using longer cranks. If there is no differentiation in demand at sub maximal efforts why cannot it be extrapolated to higher efforts?

    No studies? Maybe you don't ask the right people or know how to conduct your own objective "studies". Out of the saddle needs vs. seated? Sudden changes in speed and/or cadences? Means to reach maximal efforts vs. sub-maximal? Don't learn for yourself-trust only Pubmed for all your training.
    🙂

  2. taras0000 said:

    I have experienced the same thing, even in larger gears. like a mentioned earlier, probably due to the fact that your hip is in a better position to transmit power.


    Please elaborate on this. I'm 6'2" with a 36" cycling inseam and I have an old Bianch steel with 175mm cranks and my modern Scott Cr1 Pro "climbing bike" has 177.5mm.

    I seem to be a little "snappier" with my 175mm . Can you explain this hip angle theory further? :o

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.