When does the 2 years start for Froid ?

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

UCI->US Cycling Federation, that should't take more than a month. Once
they spell it out, does it go into effect the day the the "A" sample
came out, or "B", or day of testing ?

"I would not expect a decision to be made in Landis's case until
December of this year or January of next year," Buxeda said. He can't
be referring to a decision by the US Cycling federation surely ?

The appeal.

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

UCI->US Cycling Federation, that should't take more than a month. Once
they spell it out, does it go into effect the day the the "A" sample
came out, or "B", or day of testing ?

"I would not expect a decision to be made in Landis's case until
December of this year or January of next year," Buxeda said. He can't
be referring to a decision by the US Cycling federation surely ?

Don't you mean four years? Pro Tour is four years but he could race for a
domestic team in two.

Frank Drackman said:

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

UCI->US Cycling Federation, that should't take more than a month. Once
they spell it out, does it go into effect the day the the "A" sample
came out, or "B", or day of testing ?

"I would not expect a decision to be made in Landis's case until
December of this year or January of next year," Buxeda said. He can't
be referring to a decision by the US Cycling federation surely ?

Don't you mean four years? Pro Tour is four years but he could race for a
domestic team in two.

Right, but he's unlikely to get invited on the TDF !

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

UCI->US Cycling Federation, that should't take more than a month. Once
they spell it out, does it go into effect the day the the "A" sample
came out, or "B", or day of testing ?

"I would not expect a decision to be made in Landis's case until
December of this year or January of next year," Buxeda said. He can't
be referring to a decision by the US Cycling federation surely ?

Don't you mean four years? Pro Tour is four years but he could race for a
domestic team in two.

Right, but he's unlikely to get invited on the TDF !

I have no idea what you are talking about. Riders don't get invited, teams
do.

in 521317 20060806 191538 'Frank Drackman said:

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> UCI->US Cycling Federation, that should't take more than a month. Once
> they spell it out, does it go into effect the day the the "A" sample
> came out, or "B", or day of testing ?
>
> "I would not expect a decision to be made in Landis's case until
> December of this year or January of next year," Buxeda said. He can't
> be referring to a decision by the US Cycling federation surely ?

Don't you mean four years? Pro Tour is four years but he could race for a
domestic team in two.

Right, but he's unlikely to get invited on the TDF !

I have no idea what you are talking about. Riders don't get invited, teams
do.

I think you're being overly pedantic. To put it another way, no team which includes
Landis will be invited. It's happened before.

in message <[email hidden]>, Frank Drackman

(') said:

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> UCI->US Cycling Federation, that should't take more than a month.
> Once they spell it out, does it go into effect the day the the "A"
> sample came out, or "B", or day of testing ?
>
> "I would not expect a decision to be made in Landis's case until
> December of this year or January of next year," Buxeda said. He
> can't be referring to a decision by the US Cycling federation surely
> ?

Don't you mean four years? Pro Tour is four years but he could race
for a domestic team in two.

Right, but he's unlikely to get invited on the TDF !

I have no idea what you are talking about. Riders don't get invited,
teams do.

And a team containing Landis is unlikely to be welcome.

--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

IMHO, there aren't enough committed Christians, but that's care
in the community for you. -- Ben Evans

"Bob Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Right, but he's unlikely to get invited on the TDF !

I have no idea what you are talking about. Riders don't get invited,
teams
do.

I think you're being overly pedantic. To put it another way, no team
which includes
Landis will be invited. It's happened before.

If the Pro Tour stays around they would have no choice...David Millar

Frank Drackman said:

If the Pro Tour stays around they would have no choice...David Millar

Things hsve changed since then: now ProTour teams are not available for 4,
not 2, years.

Dan

Frank Drackman said:

Quoted message said:

If the Pro Tour stays around they would have no choice...David Millar

Dan Connelly said:

Things hsve changed since then: now ProTour teams are not available for 4,
not 2, years.

Hardly matters if the ProTour isn't around any more.

Simon Brooke said:

in message <[email hidden]>, Frank Drackman

(') said:

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:01:20 -0700, "Frank Drackman"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

>
>"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> UCI->US Cycling Federation, that should't take more than a month.
>> Once they spell it out, does it go into effect the day the the "A"
>> sample came out, or "B", or day of testing ?
>>
>> "I would not expect a decision to be made in Landis's case until
>> December of this year or January of next year," Buxeda said. He
>> can't be referring to a decision by the US Cycling federation surely
>> ?
>
>Don't you mean four years? Pro Tour is four years but he could race
>for a domestic team in two.

Right, but he's unlikely to get invited on the TDF !

I have no idea what you are talking about. Riders don't get invited,
teams do.

And a team containing Landis is unlikely to be welcome.

Right, like they didn't want Virenque back, either. All Landis has to
do is whine like some french [censored] and they'll welcome him back with
open arms.

Donald Munro said:

Frank Drackman said:

Quoted message said:

If the Pro Tour stays around they would have no choice...David Millar

Dan Connelly said:

Things hsve changed since then: now ProTour teams are not available for 4,
not 2, years.

Hardly matters if the ProTour isn't around any more.

It hardly matters if Floyd isn't around, either, and if he is banned for
two years, he's done.

Dan

"Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

Quoted message said:

If the Pro Tour stays around they would have no choice...David Millar

Dan Connelly said:

Things hsve changed since then: now ProTour teams are not available for
4,
not 2, years.

Hardly matters if the ProTour isn't around any more.

And in fact we can pretty much count that this is the end of the UCI as
they've been constituted. No Tour de France will ever again have any
validity. Those against doping have managed to cast the pall on the entire
sport. What is now done cannot be undone.

"Dan Connelly" <d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

If the Pro Tour stays around they would have no choice...David Millar

Things hsve changed since then: now ProTour teams are not available for 4,
not 2, years.

That information was included earlier in the thread