Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

MTB plug on NPR this morning

Started by Slack · · Last activity · 14 posts · 616 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
28 October 2006
Last activity
5 November 2006
Original author
Slack
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
616
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hey Mikey.... now hear this 🙂

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6397280
    --
    Slack

  2. --
    No Signature. Read on.
    "Slack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:op.th42hu0ezp822k@slacker...
    Hey Mikey.... now hear this 🙂

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6397280
    --
    Slack

    You beat me to it. I just listened. It goes against everything MV is
    saying.

    TJ

  3. On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:54:56 -0700, Slack <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hey Mikey.... now hear this 🙂

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6397280

    More mountain bikers lying? What's new about that?
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  4. The Sierra Club...? The NPS...? Off-road cyclists...? All lying about the
    advantages of outdoor enthusiasts banding together to keep natutal areas
    from development...?

    Once again you show your true colors are not on the side of protecting
    nature but simply to get bikes off trails because YOU do not like them. Once
    again you ignore the REAL evidence of cooperation to preserve, the REAL
    evidence showing comparison in activities, and the REAL evidence that your
    agenda has been labeled antiquated and obstructive.

  5. On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:32:01 -0500, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Sierra Club...? The NPS...? Off-road cyclists...? All lying about the
    advantages of outdoor enthusiasts banding together to keep natutal areas
    from development...?

    Yes. Lying about the impacts of mountain biking.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  6. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:32:01 -0500, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Sierra Club...? The NPS...? Off-road cyclists...? All lying about the
    advantages of outdoor enthusiasts banding together to keep natutal areas
    from development...?

    Yes. Lying about the impacts of mountain biking.
    ===


    So says you. And that means nothing.
    And why did you clip the following without addressing it? Too much truth too
    close to home?

    Once again you show your true colors are not on the side of protecting
    nature but simply to get bikes off trails because YOU do not like them. Once
    again you ignore the REAL evidence of cooperation to preserve, the REAL
    evidence showing comparison in activities, and the REAL evidence that your
    agenda has been labeled antiquated and obstructive.

  7. On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:23:49 -0500, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:32:01 -0500, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Sierra Club...? The NPS...? Off-road cyclists...? All lying about the
    advantages of outdoor enthusiasts banding together to keep natutal areas
    from development...?

    Yes. Lying about the impacts of mountain biking.
    ===


    So says you. And that means nothing.
    And why did you clip the following without addressing it? Too much truth too
    close to home?

    Once again you show your true colors are not on the side of protecting
    nature but simply to get bikes off trails because YOU do not like them. Once
    again you ignore the REAL evidence of cooperation to preserve, the REAL
    evidence showing comparison in activities, and the REAL evidence that your
    agenda has been labeled antiquated and obstructive.

    Did you say something?
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  8. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:23:49 -0500, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:32:01 -0500, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >The Sierra Club...? The NPS...? Off-road cyclists...? All lying about
    >the
    >advantages of outdoor enthusiasts banding together to keep natutal areas
    >from development...?

    Yes. Lying about the impacts of mountain biking.
    ===


    So says you. And that means nothing.
    And why did you clip the following without addressing it? Too much truth
    too
    close to home?

    Once again you show your true colors are not on the side of protecting
    nature but simply to get bikes off trails because YOU do not like them.
    Once
    again you ignore the REAL evidence of cooperation to preserve, the REAL
    evidence showing comparison in activities, and the REAL evidence that your
    agenda has been labeled antiquated and obstructive.

    Did you say something?
    ===


    Awwww... It would be enjoyable to watch you flail away in that Egyptian
    river... if it wasn't so pathetic.

  9. S Curtiss said:

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Did you say something?

    This is as close to a rhetorical question as MV can get; the usual and
    apparent rhetorical retort is "Yes." What stymies the matter is that MV
    can go no further; additional discourse or even attempts at discourse
    seem to clog his thought process to the point of ossification. In
    actuality, MV's response is a rather choked-off recognition that the
    poster's comments have some verity & MV is powerless (as always) to
    reute them but at such brief moments as this he's brought face-to-face
    with his inability to engage in rational discourse.

    PH

  10. pmhilton said:
    S Curtiss said:

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Did you say something?

    This is as close to a rhetorical question as MV can get; the usual and
    apparent rhetorical retort is "Yes." What stymies the matter is that MV
    can go no further; additional discourse or even attempts at discourse
    seem to clog his thought process to the point of ossification. In
    actuality, MV's response is a rather choked-off recognition that the
    poster's comments have some verity & MV is powerless (as always) to
    reute them

    What are you smoking? I ignore people who don't say anything (valid).

    but at such brief moments as this he's brought face-to-face

    Quoted message said:

    with his inability to engage in rational discourse.

    PH


    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  11. pmhilton said:
    S Curtiss said:

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Did you say something?

    This is as close to a rhetorical question as MV can get; the usual and
    apparent rhetorical retort is "Yes." What stymies the matter is that MV
    can go no further; additional discourse or even attempts at discourse
    seem to clog his thought process to the point of ossification. In
    actuality, MV's response is a rather choked-off recognition that the
    poster's comments have some verity & MV is powerless (as always) to
    reute them but at such brief moments as this he's brought face-to-face
    with his inability to engage in rational discourse.

    PH

    I think he's a bot.

    Matt

  12. MattB wrote (of the Mad Do{r}c):

    Quoted message said:

    I think he's a bot.

    Bots everywhere bristle just a bit.

    BS (but seriously...)

  13. Bill Sornson said:

    MattB wrote (of the Mad Do{r}c):

    Quoted message said:

    I think he's a bot.

    Bots everywhere bristle just a bit.

    Bill, you def have your moments.

    Quoted message said:


    BS (but seriously...)

  14. So what is it like to live every day of your life ignoring yourself?

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:37:23 -0500, pmhilton <[email hidden]> wrote:
    What are you smoking? I ignore people who don't say anything (valid).

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.