UK and Europe · Public discussion

MI5 Persecution: Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Investigations Group

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 1 post · 247 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 November 2006
Last activity
30 November 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
247
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Investigations Group

    In July 1994 the private detective agency Nationwide Investigations Group conducted an electronic counter-surveillance
    sweep of my parents' home in London. They checked for radio transmitter devices, and tested the telephone line for attached
    bugs. They found nothing.

    I am afraid that I was unsurprised at their not finding any evidence of covert surveillance. It had been made very clear to me,
    particularly during 1990-92, that audio, and almost certainly video, surveillance of my parents' home was taking place. But this
    would not have been made quite so obvious unless the persecutors were confident of their apparatus being undetectable using the
    technology the police, or a private agency like Nationwide, would be using.

    I don't know very much about the surveillance technology that has been used against me, but I understand that devices can be built
    which switch off on receiving a coded command, and may switch on again after a counter- surveillance sweep has completed; that devices
    may rapidly alter the frequency of transmission, "frequency-hopping" devices which presumably cannot be detected in a sequential scan
    of the sort employed by Nationwide; and of course "probe" microphones can be inserted "through-the-wall", although I hesitate to
    believe our neighbours would permit this.

    We paid Nationwide £411.25 (including VAT) for the surveillance sweep, which took them about an hour and a half to complete, using
    a "Professional 5000 multi-scanner, CCL UHF scanner and Guideline telephone tap detector." As I said above, I don't know very much
    about these things, so I can't comment on the capabilities or otherwise of this equipment. But clearly the "watchers" are using
    technology which in 1994 was beyond the detection capabilities of a good private detective agency.

    820

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.