Does this mean that carbs have less kcal than originally assumed?++ncbi.nlm.nih.goventrOpen ↗
ez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11126204&dopt=Abstract++
-------------- ÀÎÅÍ³Ý Ä«¸®½º¸¶ KORNET -------------
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
low fat is superior to low-kcal
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 21 October 2003
- Last activity
- 25 October 2003
- Original author
- Wuzzy
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 764
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
wuzzy <[email hidden]> wrote or quoted:
Quoted message said:
Does this mean that carbs have less kcal than originally assumed?
No - nor does your subject line reflect its findings.
--
__________
|im |yler timtyler.orgtimtyler.orgOpen ↗ [email hidden] Remove lock to reply. -
you are incorrectly supparizing the abstract. It says that low fat produced some weight loss. (6
lbs). It does not say that it is superior to any other weight loss program.i
In article said:
Does this mean that carbs have less kcal than originally assumed?++ncbi.nlm.nih.govenOpen ↗
trez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11126204&dopt=Abstract++
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.