Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

MI5 Persecution: purpose in publicizing it; censorship in uk.* newsgroups

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 1 post · 358 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
27 December 2006
Last activity
27 December 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
358
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    -= purpose in publicizing it; censorship in uk.* newsgroups -=
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    The postings to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction from
    Usenet readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried strenuously to
    suppress what was being said, both by breaking the rules of netiquette in
    their responses on the forum, and directly by action to revoke the account
    from which the postings were issued.

    Yet the postings were within the normal boundaries of behaviour for
    uk.misc, and other less partisan spectators did not see justice in the
    censorship which was effected, as the following excerpt shows;

    :Karen Lofstrom ([email hidden]) wrote
    :>It does seem that the frequency and the size of his posts are
    :>approaching net abuse. However, IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If
    :>his postmaster were to act in this instance, it would raise troubling
    :>censorship issues.

    The inescapable conclusion of the censorship effected on the uk.*
    newsgroups is that the British are intent on their wrongdoing remaining
    concealed, and therefore seek to subvert and suppress freedom of speech,
    not only in their own country where the media shows xenophobic bias and
    bile against all perceived enemies within and without, but also in other
    countries which have their own statutes to guarantee the basic human right
    of free speech.

    It is absolutely necessary to bring their hate campaign out into the open
    where it can be placed under scrutiny and the harassers seen for what they
    are. That is the only way of making it impossible for the security services
    to carry it out. There is a wider dimension, though. Xenophobia as
    demonstrated by British people and institutions over the last few years
    belongs to the same stable as racial hatred. In one case, two youths on a
    Tube train made that racism explicit by referring to their victim as a
    "soft toy, not up to British Standards". Doubtless others victimize partly
    on the basis of race (isn’t it odd that they chose to torment someone who
    is not ethnically English?) while expressing their abuse in terms of
    another genetic attribute, namely mental illness. All xenophobia on a
    genetic basis is wrong, but while racial insults are illegal, abusing the
    mentally ill is neither against the law nor subject to similar condemnation
    when it is exposed.

    744

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.