Professional Cycling · Public discussion

2007 season will be war and its started

Started by foxvi · · Last activity · 10 posts · 1,781 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
22 February 2007
Last activity
24 February 2007
Original author
foxvi
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,781
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. [font=Arial]As reported on the cyclingheroes website site:[/font]

    McQuaid: ProTeams are not allowed to start at Paris-Nice

    UCI President Pat McQuaid has send a letter to all Pro-Tour teams in which McQuaid writes that the ProTeams are not allowed to start at this years edition of Paris-Nice. It's another step in the powerstruggle between the UCI and the organizers of the three Grand Tours. As reported the conflict escelated this week . In the letter of February 21, McQuaid writes that "it is obvious that the UCI cannot sanction or recognize an event that would not be held in accordance to the rules."

    McQuaids letter continues with: "Most recently we learned that ASO has made a private deal with the French Cycling Federation aiming at taking Paris-Nice out of the UCI-governed cycling and making it a "free" race on the French national calendar. This technique is not acceptable either, but anyway, as you know, UCI Pro-Tour teams cannot participate in a race on a national calendar: article 2.1.009 of the UCI regulations." The UCI president concludes his letter with: "As a result of the actions of ASO, it is clear that no UCI ProTeam is allowed to participate in Paris-Nice." It seems like ASO and the UCI are more and more dragging the Pro-Tour and Pro Continental teams into the conflict.

    As a fan of cycling it looks like our sport will be split beyond belief this season. What will the proteams do - if they dont ride in the races owned by RCS, Unpublic and the ASO sponsors will just stop. The UCI who are supposed to be the head of our sport and should have agreed to disband the current structure of the protour this season and start to work out with all parties a way forward. Its not like they have not seen it coming. But I cant see the UCI being big enough to do this after McQuaid's letter to the proteams. Proteams will make their choice but splits will happen - its going to be very messy. Real losers will be the riders, staff on the teams who may lose their jobs and us the fans.

  2. There's just no good news at the moment. With all the doping going on, I've been thinking that I would just try to enjoy the racing...now it looks like I can't even do that 😠 . This power struggle is ruining the sport.

  3. 2006 could be the year of transition, hopefully not to oblivion

  4. McQuaid is such a moron.

  5. The UCI/ProTour vs. ASO/GT fight is turning out to be more entertaining than the racing. I say bring it on. We just need some commentary by Ligget and Sherwin plus professional wrestling style interviews of McQuaid

  6. This thing reminds me of handball in portugal.

    In 2003 ( i think ) the teams created the league the federation didn´t wanted them to do that.

    So the best teams went to the league and the federation formed is own division.

    The federation didn´t allow our best teams to enter europe competitions since the federation was still the organ that represented portugal in IHF.

    Could this happen in cycling. Some teams prefering to go to the tour ( paris-nice) and being prevented from entering pro-tour competitions?

  7. Quoted post said:

    plus professional wrestling style interviews of McQuaid

    That would be great 😄

  8. There is a potential for a huge problem in P-N. The doping controls will be done by the French outside of the UCI. What if a rider tests positive? Does the UCI accept it? Does it only end up applying in France? Does the ProTour ethical charter kick in and cause the rider to be banned?

  9. Bro Deal said:

    There is a potential for a huge problem in P-N. The doping controls will be done by the French outside of the UCI. What if a rider tests positive? Does the UCI accept it? Does it only end up applying in France? Does the ProTour ethical charter kick in and cause the rider to be banned?

    Good point.

    As we know France has taken a tough line on the issue of doping at national federation level.
    Thus we had the "mass emigration to Girona" several years back.

    French testing is more rigid, more proactive than the UCI's.

  10. limerickman said:

    Good point.

    As we know France has taken a tough line on the issue of doping at national federation level.
    Thus we had the "mass emigration to Girona" several years back.

    French testing is more rigid, more proactive than the UCI's.


    I am thinking that there is the potential for another doping mess up. If the UCI does not, or because of regulations or protocols cannot, sanction a rider we could be left with a farce where a positive rider continues to race.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.