Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Horiz dropout / axle placement question

Started by bicycle6228 · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,225 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 April 2007
Last activity
10 April 2007
Original author
bicycle6228
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,225
Views / 30 days
5

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Campagnolo Record rear derailleur and Suntour Winner freewheel having
    26T largest cog: Unless the rear axle is positioned almost at the
    extreme rear of the horizontal dropouts, the derailleur's upper jockey
    pulley's teeth contact the teeth of the 26T cog. With the axle
    positioned as mentioned, two things happen that prevent this tooth
    contact problem: 1) the freewheel center is further to the rear than
    the jockey pulley; 2) the distance the chain must span from chainring
    to cog is greater, causing the upper jockey pulley to be lower, due to
    further CCW rotation of the jockey pulley assembly (viewed from drive
    side).
    I have the chain length as short as possible to still allow 52T CR /
    26T cog usage, though I never use this combo.
    I guess one result is a longer wheelbase, which doesn't bother me
    unless someone convinces me it should cause concern. The other
    possible result relates to mechanical integrity. If it matters, this
    bike is used for commuting and towing a trailer. I'm not a heavy or
    particularly strong rider, but I often carry up to 10 LBS on a rear
    rack plus pull the trailer. In the last 3 years, I've had two steel
    frames develop cracks in the drive side chain stay near the BB shell:
    one was a 30 year old Peugeot U08, the other was an unknown vintage,
    unknown maker steel frame allegedly made in Switzerland.
    Here's the question: Does positioning the rear axle at or near the
    rear limit of horizontal dropouts have any impact on durability of the
    bicycle overall?
    Any advice or comments greatly appreciated. If nothing else, perhaps
    I've amused the group with my retro / entry level componentry.

  2. bicycle6228 said:

    Campagnolo Record rear derailleur and Suntour Winner freewheel having
    26T largest cog: Unless the rear axle is positioned almost at the
    extreme rear of the horizontal dropouts, the derailleur's upper jockey
    pulley's teeth contact the teeth of the 26T cog. With the axle
    positioned as mentioned, two things happen that prevent this tooth
    contact problem: 1) the freewheel center is further to the rear than
    the jockey pulley; 2) the distance the chain must span from chainring
    to cog is greater, causing the upper jockey pulley to be lower, due to
    further CCW rotation of the jockey pulley assembly (viewed from drive
    side).
    I have the chain length as short as possible to still allow 52T CR /
    26T cog usage, though I never use this combo.
    I guess one result is a longer wheelbase, which doesn't bother me
    unless someone convinces me it should cause concern. The other
    possible result relates to mechanical integrity. If it matters, this
    bike is used for commuting and towing a trailer. I'm not a heavy or
    particularly strong rider, but I often carry up to 10 LBS on a rear
    rack plus pull the trailer. In the last 3 years, I've had two steel
    frames develop cracks in the drive side chain stay near the BB shell:
    one was a 30 year old Peugeot U08, the other was an unknown vintage,
    unknown maker steel frame allegedly made in Switzerland.
    Here's the question: Does positioning the rear axle at or near the
    rear limit of horizontal dropouts have any impact on durability of the
    bicycle overall?
    Any advice or comments greatly appreciated. If nothing else, perhaps
    I've amused the group with my retro / entry level componentry.

    Nope, what we do for larger cogs, proper chain length, and rder w/o a
    b l;imit screw-as long as the dropouts are parallel-no problema.

    many of us ride this older stuff everyday.....like I do on my Gunnar
    and Merckx..no click shifting, brifter stuff for me!!!

  3. bicycle6228 said:

    Campagnolo Record rear derailleur and Suntour Winner freewheel having
    26T largest cog: Unless the rear axle is positioned almost at the
    extreme rear of the horizontal dropouts, the derailleur's upper jockey
    pulley's teeth contact the teeth of the 26T cog. With the axle
    positioned as mentioned, two things happen that prevent this tooth
    contact problem: 1) the freewheel center is further to the rear than
    the jockey pulley; 2) the distance the chain must span from chainring
    to cog is greater, causing the upper jockey pulley to be lower, due to
    further CCW rotation of the jockey pulley assembly (viewed from drive
    side).
    I have the chain length as short as possible to still allow 52T CR /
    26T cog usage, though I never use this combo.
    I guess one result is a longer wheelbase, which doesn't bother me
    unless someone convinces me it should cause concern. The other
    possible result relates to mechanical integrity. If it matters, this
    bike is used for commuting and towing a trailer. I'm not a heavy or
    particularly strong rider, but I often carry up to 10 LBS on a rear
    rack plus pull the trailer. In the last 3 years, I've had two steel
    frames develop cracks in the drive side chain stay near the BB shell:
    one was a 30 year old Peugeot U08, the other was an unknown vintage,
    unknown maker steel frame allegedly made in Switzerland.
    Here's the question: Does positioning the rear axle at or near the
    rear limit of horizontal dropouts have any impact on durability of the
    bicycle overall?
    Any advice or comments greatly appreciated. If nothing else, perhaps
    I've amused the group with my retro / entry level componentry.

    Your classic Record 1020 (or N Record 1020a?) was rated for a '28t low
    gear' when freewheels were 14~28 and fronts were 49-51 or similar. On
    more modern 10-tooth fronts (42-52), a 24t low is the practical limit of
    dependably good response. With a 26t as you discovered, the lack of a
    top pivot spring or a "B" screw makes setup touchy. Possible but not
    straightforward.

    There's no problem doing what you describe - optimizing axle position
    for best shifting. Removing the adjuster screws may give you more room.
    Sometimes a spot of weld on the end tab's face to bring the changer back
    slightly helps. I note you set chain length to a minimum. Set it to a
    maximum for best shifting - as much as it will hold without taking the
    paint off the chainstay. (At 26t, min and max chain may be the same length!)

    Absolutely do not run a gear train with insufficient chain to shift into
    the big-big. You'll remember not to do that until you are tired, then
    you will absentmindedly shift that combination to your chagrin.
    --

    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.