UK and Europe · Public discussion

Brooks Swift/Swallow

Started by Andrew Price · · Last activity · 47 posts · 1,449 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
1 April 2007
Last activity
25 November 2007
Original author
Andrew Price
Posts
47
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,449
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 47
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    (') said:

    I'm considering buying one of these to replace the uncomfortable Selle
    Italia saddle I have on an Orbea racer.
    Could anyone let me know what the essential difference between the
    Swift and the Swallow is? All I can see is that one is very
    marginally wider than the other (155mm instead of 152mm).

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Andrew Price wrote:
    Yup. One may be the width that fits your sitbones, in which case the other
    isn't. However, without doing something decidedly personal and intimate,
    we can't tell you which.

    Quoted message said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    Bear in mind, though, that Brooks saddles, while (if they fit you)
    exceedingly comfortable, are also exceedingly heavy.

    Quoted message said:

    Swift is about 380 grams with its titanium rails and nose piece.
    Professional is about 580 grams with its steel undercarriage. Modern
    plastic torture devices (Flite) are roughly 220 grams. Older plastic
    torture devices (Rolls) are roughly 350 grams. Cutting edge (pun
    intended) modern carbon torture devices can be 150 grams.

    Its worthwhile to save weight in some places. Not worthwhile in other
    places. Saddle weight is not a criteria I use for judging it.

    Weight doesn't correlate to comfort or to popularity. Russell, I'm sure
    you can think of examples on either side of that argument.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  2. Simon Brooke said:


    Bear in mind, though, that Brooks saddles, while (if they fit you)
    exceedingly comfortable, are also exceedingly heavy. two years ago I had
    Brooks Professionals on all my bikes; now I have Selle Italia SLRs, which
    I personally find equally comfortable and which has saved 500 grammes per
    bike.

    So ... have your Brooks found new homes yet?, he asks covetously. Or are
    they still Brooke's Brooks?

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    After things go from bad to worse, the cycle will repeat itself.

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, Don Whybrow

    (') said:
    Simon Brooke said:


    Bear in mind, though, that Brooks saddles, while (if they fit you)
    exceedingly comfortable, are also exceedingly heavy. two years ago I had
    Brooks Professionals on all my bikes; now I have Selle Italia SLRs,
    which I personally find equally comfortable and which has saved 500
    grammes per bike.

    So ... have your Brooks found new homes yet?, he asks covetously. Or are
    they still Brooke's Brooks?

    I believe there is still a Brooke's Brooks in the east wing attic. I've
    given a couple away to good homes but I think there's one left. I'll have
    a look for you...

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    .::;===r==\
    / /___||___\____
    //==\- ||- | /__\( MS Windows IS an operating environment.
    //____\__||___|_// \|: C++ IS an object oriented programming language.
    \__/ ~~~~~~~~~ \__/ Citroen 2cv6 IS a four door family saloon.

  4. in message <[email hidden]>, Andrew Price

    (') said:

    On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 17:05:29 -0500, A Muzi <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:

    Swift is a traditional cut with 'side flaps' [I made up that term just
    now]. Swallows have always been folded under and either rivetted or
    rivetted and clamped with several versions over many years.

    Let us know your comments if you are able to ride both.

    Thanks, I will. I'm a happy user of Brooks saddles on other bikes
    (B17N, Conquest) but as you might have seen from my response to Simon,
    I'm still considering the trade-off of the extra weight. And still
    surprised that the Selle Italia is so damned uncomfortable!

    It's all a matter of fit - and we're a little coy about measuring our
    situpons. Measure it, and get the right one.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    my other car is #<Subr-Car: #5d480>
    ;; This joke is not funny in emacs.

  5. Den 02.04.2007 kl. 05:15 skrev Callistus Valerius <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    I thought that Brooks saddles shouldn't
    get wet, but as you know in long distance, it's impossible to avoid rain
    sometimes when you are out there so long.

    I rode a 400 km brevet four years ago with the rain pouring down at least
    12 hours. She Swift was soaked, as was everything else on and around me.
    The Brooks Swift dried up slowly during the following week, then I gave it
    a treat of Proofide. No problem and no damage whatsoever..

    Ivar of the Rainland

    --
    Sendt med Operas banebrydende postklient:
    http://www.opera.com/mail/

  6. Den 02.04.2007 kl. 19:23 skrev Andrew Price <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:


    In what way did you find it different to the Swift and the Swallow -
    comfort or merely the effect of its considerable extra weight?

    I have the Team Professional on my winter commuter bicycle which is rather
    heavy with a flat bar and fenders, so the considerable weight doesn't
    bother me.
    Team Professional has a very thick leather, that keeps its shape and
    doesn't personalise to my buttom anothomy. It is wider than the Swift and
    gives a very firm support, without being too hard. Without my personal
    dents, which give my Swift and Swallow their personality, the Professional
    after three years still feels new and at bit slidy. it offers me several
    sitting positions. I haven't ridden it for longer than 80 km, but I
    believe it would be less comfortable than its more flexible cousins in the
    long run.

    Ivar

  7. On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:25:08 +0200, "Ivar Hesselager"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:

    Team Professional has a very thick leather, that keeps its shape and
    doesn't personalise to my buttom anothomy.

    OK, many thanks, that's entirely logical, and parallels exactly my
    experience with a Conquest, compared to a B17N. The Conquest has much
    thicker leather, didn't really "personalise" itself, as you so aptly
    put it, and has *never* been as comfortable as the B17N, even after
    several thousand kilometres.

  8. In article <op.tp65j6dc1c91w4@d3q5wk2j>,

    Ivar Hesselager said:

    Den 02.04.2007 kl. 19:23 skrev Andrew Price <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:


    In what way did you find it different to the Swift and the Swallow -
    comfort or merely the effect of its considerable extra weight?

    I have the Team Professional on my winter commuter bicycle which is rather
    heavy with a flat bar and fenders, so the considerable weight doesn't
    bother me.
    Team Professional has a very thick leather, that keeps its shape and
    doesn't personalise to my buttom anothomy. It is wider than the Swift and
    gives a very firm support, without being too hard. Without my personal
    dents, which give my Swift and Swallow their personality, the Professional
    after three years still feels new and at bit slidy. it offers me several
    sitting positions. I haven't ridden it for longer than 80 km, but I
    believe it would be less comfortable than its more flexible cousins in the
    long run.

    I have two of the Professionals. One is fifteen years old
    and has dents at the sit bones. One is three years old
    and has not dented yet. Give it time.

    Oh, the new one was comfortable out of the box.
    --
    Michael Press

  9. in message <op.tp77ly181c91w4@d3q5wk2j>, Ivar Hesselager

    (') said:

    Interesting that your interpretation of the Professional's qualities is
    opposite to mine. (see my earlier posting in this thread) I have
    anticipated the Professional to be more uncomfortable than the Swift on
    very long distances, because the former is harder and "less personalised"
    than the ladder. There seems to be a good deal of Brooks experience
    represented in this thread, still it is difficult to add it up to clear
    and common conclusions, since we either have different combinations of
    Brooks saddles and/or have different actual experiences with the same
    saddles. Now I will take the Professional out on a 200 km brevet on
    April 14, and pray that I was not interely right in my anticipation.

    I think the critical thing with Brooks is fit. As others have said, the
    more upright your posture the wider the saddle you need, and I also
    suspect that the more upright your posture the less critical fit becomes.
    But in the sort of comfortable slouch you need for going reasonably fast
    over long distances fit is decidedly critical, and millimetres do make a
    difference.

    There's this myth that Brooks adapt to you. Well, not quite a myth - they
    do. But not any Brooks will adapt to any backside. If it's too narrow for
    you when it's brand new, it's still going to be too narrow for you when
    you've ridden 10,000 Km on it. And it's not going to be comfortable.

    In my experience all my Brooks Professionals have been very comfortable
    from day one; they've got more comfortable with time, but they started out
    comfortable. And I'm pretty sure that if it isn't comfortable on day one,
    it's because it's the wrong saddle for you, and nothing you do to it will
    change that.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Semper in faecibus sumus, sole profundum variat.

  10. On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:16:34 +0100, Simon Brooke
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:

    There's this myth that Brooks adapt to you. Well, not quite a myth - they
    do. But not any Brooks will adapt to any backside. If it's too narrow for
    you when it's brand new, it's still going to be too narrow for you when
    you've ridden 10,000 Km on it. And it's not going to be comfortable.

    That's undoubtedly true. However, I also believe it to be true that
    some Brooks saddles adapt quicker than others - in my experience, the
    thin-leathered B17N, in Ivar's the Swift, adapted quicker than the
    rather thicker Conquest and TP respectively.

  11. The only Brooks that I've tried is the Team Professional. After 1200
    miles of excruciating torture I finally gave up and returned to
    plastic. I'm not happy with any of the plastic saddles that I've owned
    either, but I find them much more bearable than that Team
    Professional. I was looking for that "ultimate comfort" which I'd read
    that others experienced on a Brooks, but it absolutely eluded me.
    Reading this thread has piqued my interest in Brooks saddles again,
    but I'd certainly like to avoid a repeat of my last experience. It was
    mentioned earlier in the thread that your sitbone measurements have to
    be right for the saddle. How does one go about measuring their
    sitbones width? I spend about 100 miles per day in the saddle while
    touring but, now, I keep my bars about 1 1/2"-2" below my saddle...
    when I used the Team Professional I was sitting in a much more upright
    position with my bars level with the top of my saddle. What I've read
    here, about the thinner leather of the Swift breaking in quickly, has
    great appeal to me... but I'd like to make certain that this model
    fits my sitbones before settling on it.
    Coors

  12. Per [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    How does one go about measuring their
    sitbones width?

    Sit on something that will take an impression, then measure the space between
    the dents.

    - A thin sheet of styrofoam on the corner of a counter top

    - A piece of plain 8.5 x 11 paper on a rug of the proper texture

    - One of the saddle makers (WTB?) actually makes a dedicated device.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  13. (PeteCresswell) said:

    Per [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    How does one go about measuring their
    sitbones width?

    Sit on something that will take an impression, then measure the space
    between the dents.

    - A thin sheet of styrofoam on the corner of a counter top

    - A piece of plain 8.5 x 11 paper on a rug of the proper texture

    You need a body posture which approximates to that cycling. Tucking knees up
    whilst sitting will do.

    Quoted message said:


    - One of the saddle makers (WTB?) actually makes a dedicated device.

    Its Specialized who have the measuring device. Which is some foam which
    deforms and holds its shape for a few minutes, so its easy to place a ruler
    over it. Plus a chart which translates the measurement to which saddle from
    Specialized range to use. Obviously the measurer can be used without
    necessarily buying a Specialized saddle :-)

    - Nigel

    --
    Nigel Cliffe,
    Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/

  14. Quoted message said:

    The only Brooks that I've tried is the Team Professional. After 1200
    miles of excruciating torture I finally gave up and returned to
    plastic. I'm not happy with any of the plastic saddles that I've owned
    either, but I find them much more bearable than that Team
    Professional. I was looking for that "ultimate comfort" which I'd read
    that others experienced on a Brooks, but it absolutely eluded me.
    Reading this thread has piqued my interest in Brooks saddles again,
    but I'd certainly like to avoid a repeat of my last experience. It was
    mentioned earlier in the thread that your sitbone measurements have to
    be right for the saddle. How does one go about measuring their
    sitbones width? I spend about 100 miles per day in the saddle while
    touring but, now, I keep my bars about 1 1/2"-2" below my saddle...
    when I used the Team Professional I was sitting in a much more upright
    position with my bars level with the top of my saddle. What I've read
    here, about the thinner leather of the Swift breaking in quickly, has
    great appeal to me... but I'd like to make certain that this model
    fits my sitbones before settling on it.

    The classic UK saddle for a drop-bar touring bike is the B17, or
    alternatively the Flyer which is a B17 plus coil springs at the rear. As
    well as different saddle rails (saving a few grams), the B17 comes in at
    least three widths (narrow, standard and womens).

    The B17 has considerably softer leather than some other Brooks models.
    The "hard" ones include the Conquest & Team Professional.

    A "Swift" is the same width as a "narrow B17". No idea how firm the leather
    will be, but I'd expect it to be firmer than a B17.

    One thing with a Brooks saddle, no matter which you choose, it isn't a
    lightweight thing. Even the titanium swift is pretty heavy compared to
    plastic and gell race/touring saddles.

    - Nigel

    --
    Nigel Cliffe,
    Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/

  15. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The only Brooks that I've tried is the Team Professional. After 1200
    miles of excruciating torture I finally gave up and returned to
    plastic.

    had the same problem with the last Professional I tried, but then went to
    the Brooks Colt, which I've now got two of, and they have been comfortable
    from day one. Not sure if Brooks still make them though?


  16. Quoted message said:

    The B17 has considerably softer leather than some other Brooks models.
    The "hard" ones include the Conquest & Team Professional.

    A "Swift" is the same width as a "narrow B17". No idea how firm the leather
    will be, but I'd expect it to be firmer than a B17.

    My experience has been the opposite--I have a Swift and a B17. The
    leather on the B17 is very thick and very hard. The Swift, on the
    other hand, was pretty manageable from the very first day. I rode the
    B17 for something like 1000 miles with no noticeable change in the
    saddle. I later "trimmed" the B17 to take off the skirts and, as a
    result, the saddle became more pliant, and I like it much better.

  17. I own a swift and team pro. I like them both, but i like the team pro
    a little better. the swift is a little smaller in all dimensions, to
    save weight. I am big (6'1.5"😉 and do not have a narrow pelvis. The
    swift is honestly a little too narrow for me.

    According to wallbike.com, the B-17 standard is their most popular
    saddle, and the one least oftened returned to wallbike.com. It's also
    the widest unsprung saddle.

    I come from an age when people learned to take severe bumps by flexing
    their knees slightly to reduce saddle-shock. With this precaution,
    most of the brooks saddles are comfortable. Another reason why brooks
    saddles are so often recommended is that the hard and very slick
    surface of these saddles does not produce chafing, which can be a big
    problem with a plastic saddle and a 100 mile bike ride. With plastic
    saddles there can be a stiction problem in hot weather or with sweat.

    If all you do are 2 mile bike rides, plastic / nylon is perfectly
    acceptable.

    On certain classic british bikes, the Brooks Pro / Team Pro is the
    most beautiful saddle ever made ...

    - Don Gillies
    San Diego, CA

  18. Donald Gillies said:

    On certain classic british bikes, the Brooks Pro / Team Pro is the
    most beautiful saddle ever made ...

    But if I can ever replace my Mansfield Bath Road saddle .....
    :-((

  19. (Donald Gillies) said:

    I own a swift and team pro. I like them both, but i like the team pro
    a little better. the swift is a little smaller in all dimensions, to
    save weight. I am big (6'1.5"😉 and do not have a narrow pelvis. The
    swift is honestly a little too narrow for me.

    According to wallbike.com, the B-17 standard is their most popular
    saddle, and the one least oftened returned to wallbike.com. It's also
    the widest unsprung saddle.

    I come from an age when people learned to take severe bumps by flexing
    their knees slightly to reduce saddle-shock. With this precaution,
    most of the brooks saddles are comfortable. Another reason why brooks
    saddles are so often recommended is that the hard and very slick
    surface of these saddles does not produce chafing, which can be a big
    problem with a plastic saddle and a 100 mile bike ride. With plastic
    saddles there can be a stiction problem in hot weather or with sweat.

    If all you do are 2 mile bike rides, plastic / nylon is perfectly
    acceptable.

    On certain classic british bikes, the Brooks Pro / Team Pro is the
    most beautiful saddle ever made ...

    - Don Gillies
    San Diego, CA

    I own 2 swifts and a pro. I like them both, but i like the swifts a
    little better. I'm a little smaller, at 5'11.5", and seem to have a
    width of ischial tuberosity just about between those two saddles.

    I soak the leather for new saddles wit neatsfoot oil in a tinfoil
    mold, as per http://www.sheldonbrown.com/leather.html (thanks
    Sheldon!) which is more needed for the pro than the swift. Over time
    and bumps the swift, for lack of leather, sags under weight, requiring
    periodic tightening. On one swift I'm currently at the end of the
    adjustment, the thing is somewhat more narrow as a result, I think,
    and very long and awkward, but it's got some life still, although not
    for long-haul rides. The swifts are definitely more cushy, while the
    pro is a pretty substantial and immovable hunk of firm leather. The
    most comfortable one is the one I haven't used for a while.

    I find that if I "cycle" through saddles, never riding one more than a
    few rides, or about 150 miles, whichever comes first, that the sore
    "bits" caused by saddle "a" will not be directly impacted by saddle
    "b", which will create other nearby separate sore "bits".

    I even incororate Fizik alliante, gobi, and arione into the schedule,
    for certain types of riding, such as shorter (< 2 hrs), or bumpy
    (cross/mtn). These rides are a lot harder/faster, with my legs
    holding up more of my weight, so you have less of a chance to get
    sore. Also, you're sitting on a more generalized larger area, so the
    plastic saddle cushion is kinder than hard leather pounding on
    realatively small spots, and opening sores. I think (speculating
    here!) people who only ride short, really fast on smooth surfaces,
    like typical working training cat 2-5 USCF racers in the US can
    survive just fine with plastic, but if you put on serious miles and
    actually sit on the thing for up to 25 hrs/week, then the plastic just
    doesn't cut it. I wonder if any European racers getting ready for
    spring classics train at least partly on leather. I wonder what these
    RAAM riders use.

    Bill Westphal

  20. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bill Westphal said:
    (Donald Gillies) said:

    I own a swift and team pro. I like them both, but i like the team pro
    a little better. the swift is a little smaller in all dimensions, to
    save weight. I am big (6'1.5"😉 and do not have a narrow pelvis. The
    swift is honestly a little too narrow for me.

    According to wallbike.com, the B-17 standard is their most popular
    saddle, and the one least oftened returned to wallbike.com. It's also
    the widest unsprung saddle.

    I come from an age when people learned to take severe bumps by flexing
    their knees slightly to reduce saddle-shock. With this precaution,
    most of the brooks saddles are comfortable. Another reason why brooks
    saddles are so often recommended is that the hard and very slick
    surface of these saddles does not produce chafing, which can be a big
    problem with a plastic saddle and a 100 mile bike ride. With plastic
    saddles there can be a stiction problem in hot weather or with sweat.

    If all you do are 2 mile bike rides, plastic / nylon is perfectly
    acceptable.

    On certain classic british bikes, the Brooks Pro / Team Pro is the
    most beautiful saddle ever made ...

    - Don Gillies
    San Diego, CA

    I own 2 swifts and a pro. I like them both, but i like the swifts a
    little better. I'm a little smaller, at 5'11.5", and seem to have a
    width of ischial tuberosity just about between those two saddles.

    I soak the leather for new saddles wit neatsfoot oil in a tinfoil
    mold, as per http://www.sheldonbrown.com/leather.html (thanks
    Sheldon!) which is more needed for the pro than the swift. Over time
    and bumps the swift, for lack of leather, sags under weight, requiring
    periodic tightening. On one swift I'm currently at the end of the
    adjustment, the thing is somewhat more narrow as a result, I think,
    and very long and awkward, but it's got some life still, although not
    for long-haul rides.

    One need not put oil on a leather saddle. Oil will
    shorten the usable life of a saddle. The BP saddle
    on my utility bike has ~20000 miles and three full
    turns on the adjustment nut out of about of about 45.
    A streched leather saddle saddle will prosper with
    Brooks Proofide or the equivalent in a boot wax seal
    formulation such as Sno-Seal.

    --
    Michael Press

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.