UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Tourer or Audax bike?

Started by Mark Thompson · · Last activity · 14 posts · 694 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
8 May 2007
Last activity
12 May 2007
Original author
Mark Thompson
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
694
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. John Halliwell wrote in news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    So I'm looking for a fastish bike I can ride all day, with drop bars and
    will take a carrier and mudguards. From a bit of research, this sounds
    like the recipe for an Audax/Sportive bike, but might a stripped tourer
    be a better (or equal) option?

    I'd consider this:

    <www.edinburghbicycle.com/ebwPNLqrymode.a4p?f%5FProductID=7337>

    But be saving up for this:

    <www.edinburghbicycle.com/ebwPNLqrymode.a4p?f%5FProductID=7336>

    Fantastically versatile bike, and beautiful too (the curve of the top
    tube...). Unlike a tourer it's quite light (tho heavier than a road bike
    of course).

  2. Mark Thompson pleasegivegenerously@warmmail*_turn_up_the_heat_to_reply*.com said:


    I'd consider this:

    <www.edinburghbicycle.com/ebwPNLqrymode.a4p?f%5FProductID=7337>

    I bought the Sport '06 last year with similar compromises in mind (but
    including towpaths and tours in the list). I'm pretty happy with it so
    far, and I've just done a short tour on it.

    I did upgrade the gears to 10-speed, which will also enable me to change
    to a triple ring fairly easily. But I haven't done that yet, and I think
    the Sport '07 comes in 9x3 anyway (so I guess I wasn't the only person
    who asked ..).

    -adrian

  3. If it was me, (which it isn't) I'd definitely go for the audax bike
    and not worry about the supposed superior 'comfort' that a tourer
    would give, because I have found that decent hand built wheels (of any
    sort) and a good set of tyres (even in 23mm) are incredibly
    comfortable. I recently swapped from cheaper Panaracer Pasalas with
    Tour Guard, in 28mm (about £30 a pair) to expensive Continental
    GP4000s in 23mm (about £70 a pair) and the diffrence is amazing, and
    yet they are thinner lighter tyres. The reason they are more
    comfortable is because they use a greater amount of threads per quare
    cm, so even though they don't hold as much air, the rubber is more
    supple and flexible, even though it is still quite puncture
    resistant. I am not suggesting these particular tyres would be any
    good for off road use, but it is possible to fit very hard wearing and
    yet very comfortable tyres in nay size that will make any bike pretty
    comfortable. Overall I would say that if you get a decent quality
    frame and good hand built wheels, the bike will be just as comfortable
    whether it is of touring weight and geometry, or a lighter and
    sportier audax bike, so it's really down to what you are going to be
    using the bike for. If you're not going on fully laden tours, IMO you
    just dont need a tourer - you will just be carrying a whole lot of
    weight you don't need and the geometry will be less responsive than
    the audax style bike.

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    Blonde <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Overall I would say that if you get a decent quality
    frame and good hand built wheels, the bike will be just as comfortable
    whether it is of touring weight and geometry, or a lighter and
    sportier audax bike, so it's really down to what you are going to be
    using the bike for. If you're not going on fully laden tours, IMO you
    just dont need a tourer - you will just be carrying a whole lot of
    weight you don't need and the geometry will be less responsive than
    the audax style bike.

    Thanks to everybody. I was (very) impressed by the Tricross concept, but
    having considered the carbon bits, I think I'd prefer something in more
    traditional steel.

    I guess I've decided I'm after an audax bike with lugs for mudguards and
    carriers. Are these likely to have adequate clearance for touring type
    wheels/tyres?

    --
    John

  5. John Halliwell said:

    Thanks to everybody. I was (very) impressed by the Tricross concept,
    but having considered the carbon bits, I think I'd prefer something
    in more traditional steel.

    I guess I've decided I'm after an audax bike with lugs for mudguards
    and carriers. Are these likely to have adequate clearance for touring
    type wheels/tyres?

    Touring wheels* with 28mm touring tyres should no problem in any "audax"
    bike. I'm sure some will take wider tyres, but my (alloy) Tifosi** doesn't
    look as if it could - safely. I like to leave some wobble room as it would
    be a shame to be stranded by a slightly buckled wheel. In fact I use 25mm
    tyres with it for extra speed - quite comfortable enough.

    * Not essential as narrower rims such as Mavic Open Pro are quite strong and
    actually work fine with 28mm tyres.

    ** Doesn't /have/ to be used with carbon bits ;-)

    ~PB

  6. Replying to myself - cos I know what someone is going to say!:

    Quoted message said:

    I like to leave some
    wobble room as it would be a shame to be stranded by a slightly
    buckled wheel.

    OK, you can true a buckled wheel.... normally - but not necessarily well
    enough if the rim got bent or a spoke has broken (and you can't or don't
    replace the spoke).

    ~PB

  7. John Halliwell said:


    I guess I've decided I'm after an audax bike with lugs for mudguards and
    carriers. Are these likely to have adequate clearance for touring type
    wheels/tyres?


    Assuming rimbrakes, you can either have:

    - a 'racing frame' with 39-47 mm brakes (28mm tyres max, no mudguards,

    - a frame specialy built for taller 49-57mm calipers which old hands
    might call 'normal' reach (28 mm with mudguard, 35 without mudguards but
    the thick tyre might not drop out of the brake with QR open) or

    - a frameset with cantileverposts for V-s or canti's. Tyresize for the
    latter is a question of forkcrown design and of what happened with the
    chain and seatstays.

    All three categories of frame can be built with or without lugs and in
    any material

    --
    ---
    Marten Gerritsen

    INFOapestaartjeM-GINEERINGpuntNL
    www.m-gineering.nl

  8. John Halliwell said:


    I guess I've decided I'm after an audax bike with lugs for mudguards and
    carriers. Are these likely to have adequate clearance for touring type
    wheels/tyres?

    --
    John

    Some do some don't, I am thinking of 28mm tyres. IMO your requirement
    is one of the characteristics of a machine marketed as a Audax
    Machine. The Hewitt Chiltern does as I think the Bob Jackson Audax End
    to End does.

  9. On 11 May 2007 02:02:31 -0700, MSeries <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    John Halliwell said:


    I guess I've decided I'm after an audax bike with lugs for mudguards and
    carriers. Are these likely to have adequate clearance for touring type
    wheels/tyres?

    --
    John

    Some do some don't, I am thinking of 28mm tyres. IMO your requirement
    is one of the characteristics of a machine marketed as a Audax
    Machine. The Hewitt Chiltern does as I think the Bob Jackson Audax End
    to End does.

    Mercian Audax does too. (Mine has 28mm tyres on, innit)

    Tim

  10. Tim Hall said:


    Mercian Audax does too. (Mine has 28mm tyres on, innit)

    My Mercian Audax has 32mm's and no mudguards, however, with mudguards I can
    only fit 28's.

    Tom

    --
    Return address is dead. Real address is at
    http://www.happy-penguin.info/address.jpg

  11. In article <[email hidden]>, Pete Biggs <p@pomegrana
    teremovehighlyimpracticalfruitbiggs.tc> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Touring wheels* with 28mm touring tyres should no problem in any "audax"
    bike. I'm sure some will take wider tyres, but my (alloy) Tifosi** doesn't
    look as if it could - safely. I like to leave some wobble room as it would
    be a shame to be stranded by a slightly buckled wheel. In fact I use 25mm
    tyres with it for extra speed - quite comfortable enough.

    * Not essential as narrower rims such as Mavic Open Pro are quite strong and
    actually work fine with 28mm tyres.

    ** Doesn't /have/ to be used with carbon bits ;-)

    I hadn't really considered differences between 28 & 32mm tyres, but
    would want mudguards. Gut reaction suggests 32mm sounds close to the
    width of the 27*1.25" I've used before and might be preferable.

    I had a look at a Horizon and Dawes Audax today, the Horizon seemed to
    have very wide tyres, whilst the Audax didn't look like it would take
    anything wider than the 'thin' tyres.

    --
    John

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,
    MSeries <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Some do some don't, I am thinking of 28mm tyres. IMO your requirement
    is one of the characteristics of a machine marketed as a Audax
    Machine. The Hewitt Chiltern does as I think the Bob Jackson Audax End
    to End does.

    Thanks, I'll have a look at the Hewitt, I stumbled across the Chevoit
    today, looks interesting as well.

    --
    John

  13. John Halliwell said:

    I had a look at a Horizon and Dawes Audax today,

    I have had a Dawes Audax for a few years now, it's been really good.
    Perfect commuter bike! also, Dawes were fabulous when I took out the BB
    to find it had been put in skewed (a common fault apparently) and it
    stripped the thread; they gave me a new frame/fork/crankset/seatpin
    under warranty. They were also happy to deal with me directly rather
    than me go through the dealer (which was a long way from my home) and
    made it all a very painless process. Well done Dawes!

    hth,

    Tony B

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, Tony B
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I have had a Dawes Audax for a few years now, it's been really good.
    Perfect commuter bike! also, Dawes were fabulous when I took out the BB
    to find it had been put in skewed (a common fault apparently) and it
    stripped the thread; they gave me a new frame/fork/crankset/seatpin
    under warranty. They were also happy to deal with me directly rather
    than me go through the dealer (which was a long way from my home) and
    made it all a very painless process. Well done Dawes!

    What tyres are you running, how do they cope with today's poor roads?

    Yes, having resurrected a neglected 20 year old Dawes Windsor, if I do
    get a new bike, Dawes will be very high on the list.

    --
    John

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.