Hi.
Is 2*20 @ AT - more effective then 1 session of 40 minutes ?
Thanks 🙂
Cycling Training · Public discussion
2*20 @ AT - more effective then 1 session of 40 minutes ?
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Training
- Published
- 9 May 2007
- Last activity
- 9 May 2007
- Original author
- VS1
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 1,306
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
VS1 said:
Hi.
Is 2*20 @ AT - more effective then 1 session of 40 minutes ?
Thanks 🙂
no. next question 🙂 -
What's AT?
-
wiredued said:
What's AT?
olde skool precursor to threshold, FTP, MLSS, yadda yadda yadda ...
-
Thanks sometimes I'm the Forest Gump of cycling.... You probably wouldn't believe me if I told you but I can ride like the wind.🙂
rmur17 said:
olde skool precursor to threshold, FTP, MLSS, yadda yadda yadda ...
-
AT = aerobic threshold
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.