In article <[email hidden]>,
Quoted post said:Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, bar
(') said:... if there were any justice in the world. Instead, he gets one for
himself, then works like a dog for two other chumps:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...
Piepoli is a great climber - one of the best. I always like to watch him.
Piepoli is also a pro. He's on a team with a big star
and a rising star, and he's already won a stage, and
he has no ambitions for the overall. So whether or not
Simoni and Ricco were actually stronger than Piepoli at
the finish lines, them winning stages is good for the
team, the sponsor and the PR (remembering that team,
sponsor, and PR value are very directly linked).
I expect that everybody knows this including Piepoli
and whoever writes the bonus or prize checks that
Piepoli is likely to get. I like to see
professionalism, even if the OP mistakes it for
chumpism.
That's the same reason Simoni sat on in the chase group the day that Ricco won:
professionalism. He's sharp enough to not help drag a group up to his team mates. And
Piepoli is a real professional too. Probably one of the best out there, I think.
Quoted message said:This is one reason why tactics and teams are different
in bike racing than say running (or even racecar
driving, where there's drafting but teams are notional).
Well, there is the same kind of teamwork in car racing sometimes. For example, in
the early '90s the SCCA had a class for minitrucks and the Archer brothers (on the
same team) would get away to a big lead and draft each other like mad then give the
win to whichever one needed the points most.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?