Road Cycling · Public discussion

So that'd be three stage wins for Piepoli ...

Started by bar · · Last activity · 9 posts · 713 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
31 May 2007
Last activity
1 June 2007
Original author
bar
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
713
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. .... if there were any justice in the world. Instead, he gets one for
    himself, then works like a dog for two other chumps:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/giro07/giro0717/fs004

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/giro07/giro0715/fs001

  2. Obviously you didn't watch the stages. Ricco and Simoni most
    definitely didn't steal the stages.

    Ricco was much stronger in his victory, where he did the lead out over
    the last two cols.

    Simoni was the one boosting up the important part of the Zoncolan.
    After the finisg they said (Simoni with Piepoli standing next to
    him):

    "At one point Leo told me to stop pulling, so he could work for me,"
    noted Simoni standing next to his teammate. The two-time Giro winner
    worked with Piepoli and young Schleck up the gradients to put race
    leader Di Luca into difficulty. The Saunier duo was not able to make
    the distance and it then decided to focus on the stage victory."

    They should definitely be very grateful towards Piepoli, but if you
    had seen the stages you wouldn't doubt that the strongest rider won,

    bar said:

    ... if there were any justice in the world. Instead, he gets one for
    himself, then works like a dog for two other chumps:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

  3. Tuschinski said:

    Obviously you didn't watch the stages. Ricco and Simoni most
    definitely didn't steal the stages.

    Ricco was much stronger in his victory, where he did the lead out over
    the last two cols.

    Stage wins traditionally occur right near the finish line - not a
    couple climbs back. Piepoli certainly let Ricco take the win. There
    was a conversation a couple or three hundred meters down where Ricco
    interrupted his facial rictus to smile. I'm guessing that's where
    Piepoli said, "Vai, Ricco!"

    R

  4. RicodJour said:
    Tuschinski said:

    Obviously you didn't watch the stages. Ricco and Simoni most
    definitely didn't steal the stages.

    Quoted message said:

    Ricco was much stronger in his victory, where he did the lead out over
    the last two cols.

    Stage wins traditionally occur right near the finish line - not a
    couple climbs back. Piepoli certainly let Ricco take the win. There
    was a conversation a couple or three hundred meters down where Ricco
    interrupted his facial rictus to smile. I'm guessing that's where
    Piepoli said, "Vai, Ricco!"

    R

    Oh yes, agreed there, but I contested what the OP had said, wich was a
    different cup of tea :P

  5. Tuschinski said:
    RicodJour said:

    On May 31, 3:14 am, Tuschinski <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Obviously you didn't watch the stages. Ricco and Simoni most
    definitely didn't steal the stages.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ricco was much stronger in his victory, where he did the lead out over
    the last two cols.

    Quoted message said:

    Stage wins traditionally occur right near the finish line - not a
    couple climbs back. Piepoli certainly let Ricco take the win. There
    was a conversation a couple or three hundred meters down where Ricco
    interrupted his facial rictus to smile. I'm guessing that's where
    Piepoli said, "Vai, Ricco!"

    Quoted message said:

    R

    Oh yes, agreed there, but I contested what the OP had said, wich was a
    different cup of tea :P

    i don't drink tea ... only testosterone-laden starbucks expresso

  6. in message <[email hidden]>, bar

    (') said:

    ... if there were any justice in the world. Instead, he gets one for
    himself, then works like a dog for two other chumps:


    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/giro07/giro0717/fs004

    Quoted message said:



    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/giro07/giro0715/fs001

    Piepoli is a great climber - one of the best. I always like to watch him.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    Das Internet is nicht fuer gefingerclicken und giffengrabben... Ist
    nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das mausklicken sichtseeren
    keepen das bandwit-spewin hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und
    watchen das cursorblinken. -- quoted from the jargon file

  7. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, bar

    (') said:

    ... if there were any justice in the world. Instead, he gets one for
    himself, then works like a dog for two other chumps:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

    Piepoli is a great climber - one of the best. I always like to watch him.

    Piepoli is also a pro. He's on a team with a big star
    and a rising star, and he's already won a stage, and
    he has no ambitions for the overall. So whether or not
    Simoni and Ricco were actually stronger than Piepoli at
    the finish lines, them winning stages is good for the
    team, the sponsor and the PR (remembering that team,
    sponsor, and PR value are very directly linked).
    I expect that everybody knows this including Piepoli
    and whoever writes the bonus or prize checks that
    Piepoli is likely to get. I like to see
    professionalism, even if the OP mistakes it for
    chumpism.

    This is one reason why tactics and teams are different
    in bike racing than say running (or even racecar
    driving, where there's drafting but teams are notional).

    Ben

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, bar

    (') said:

    ... if there were any justice in the world. Instead, he gets one for
    himself, then works like a dog for two other chumps:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

    Piepoli is a great climber - one of the best. I always like to watch him.

    Piepoli is also a pro. He's on a team with a big star
    and a rising star, and he's already won a stage, and
    he has no ambitions for the overall. So whether or not
    Simoni and Ricco were actually stronger than Piepoli at
    the finish lines, them winning stages is good for the
    team, the sponsor and the PR (remembering that team,
    sponsor, and PR value are very directly linked).
    I expect that everybody knows this including Piepoli
    and whoever writes the bonus or prize checks that
    Piepoli is likely to get. I like to see
    professionalism, even if the OP mistakes it for
    chumpism.

    That's the same reason Simoni sat on in the chase group the day that Ricco won:
    professionalism. He's sharp enough to not help drag a group up to his team mates. And
    Piepoli is a real professional too. Probably one of the best out there, I think.

    Quoted message said:

    This is one reason why tactics and teams are different
    in bike racing than say running (or even racecar
    driving, where there's drafting but teams are notional).

    Well, there is the same kind of teamwork in car racing sometimes. For example, in
    the early '90s the SCCA had a class for minitrucks and the Archer brothers (on the
    same team) would get away to a big lead and draft each other like mad then give the
    win to whichever one needed the points most.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  9. email hidden said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, bar

    (') said:

    ... if there were any justice in the world. Instead, he gets one for
    himself, then works like a dog for two other chumps:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/giro07/index.php?id=/photos/20...

    Piepoli is a great climber - one of the best. I always like to watch him.

    Piepoli is also a pro. He's on a team with a big star
    and a rising star, and he's already won a stage, and
    he has no ambitions for the overall. So whether or not
    Simoni and Ricco were actually stronger than Piepoli at
    the finish lines, them winning stages is good for the
    team, the sponsor and the PR (remembering that team,
    sponsor, and PR value are very directly linked).
    I expect that everybody knows this including Piepoli
    and whoever writes the bonus or prize checks that
    Piepoli is likely to get. I like to see
    professionalism, even if the OP mistakes it for
    chumpism.

    This is one reason why tactics and teams are different
    in bike racing than say running (or even racecar
    driving, where there's drafting but teams are notional).

    A few years back there were a couple of Canadian brother running in an IMSA
    compact sedan class who used to see who qualified best, then during the race the
    first would lead with bro' bumper drafting down the straights. The bastids were
    damn near unbeatable.

    That was an exception. Usually there isn't much a team mate can do for you.

    Ron

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.