Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

campagnolo euclid brakes ?

Started by mariusz · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,594 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 July 2007
Last activity
5 July 2007
Original author
mariusz
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,594
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. hi there,
    what kind of campagnolo is that ?

    http://www.allegro.pl/item211145213_hamulce_campagnolo.html

    regards
    Mariusz

  2. Mountain bike brakes developed by Campagnolo in the late '80s/early
    '90s. When mountain bikes started to get big in the early '80s
    Campagnolo dismissed them as a short lived fad. When it looked like MTBs
    would be here a while they brought out a series of MTB component groups
    that had some interesting ideas that did not sell well. At one point one
    member of the Campagnolo family was traveling the US MTB racing circuit
    talking to racers and (I think) entering races, trying to find out what
    would work and what wouldn't. They finally decided to stick to road bikes.

    The brakes in the photo look like the "mono-planar" design, one of the
    brake arms passed through a slot in the other arm.

    mark

    mariusz said:

    hi there,
    what kind of campagnolo is that ?

    http://www.allegro.pl/item211145213_hamulce_campagnolo.html

    regards
    Mariusz

  3. mariusz said:

    hi there,
    what kind of campagnolo is that ?

    http://www.allegro.pl/item211145213_hamulce_campagnolo.html

    regards
    Mariusz

    As mark mentioned and the brakes are 'u-brakes'. Made obsolete by
    cantilever brakes..different post placement.

  4. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    mariusz said:

    hi there,
    what kind of campagnolo is that ?

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.allegro.pl/item211145213_hamulce_campagnolo.html

    Quoted message said:

    regards
    Mariusz

    As mark mentioned and the brakes are 'u-brakes'. Made obsolete by
    cantilever brakes..different post placement.

    Made obsolete? I mean, Cantilevers were around for decades before U-
    brakes (and other high-post brakes, like rollercams). It's more like
    the fad passed than they were made obsolete.

    Maybe they were made obsolete by _low-profile_ cantis, which addressed
    the heel clearance issues high-post brakes supposedly addressed.

  5. mariusz said:

    what kind of campagnolo is that ?
    http://www.allegro.pl/item211145213_hamulce_campagnolo.html

    Circa 1990 MTB brake set. A bit heavy but very well made. Levers have
    more position adjustments than other styles.

    Note that few frames have "U Brake" brazed bosses above the rim ( higher
    than cantilever/V bosses)
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  6. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    mariusz said:

    hi there,
    what kind of campagnolo is that ?

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.allegro.pl/item211145213_hamulce_campagnolo.html

    Quoted message said:

    regards
    Mariusz

    As mark mentioned and the brakes are 'u-brakes'. Made obsolete by
    cantilever brakes..different post placement.

    U brakes collected dirt and mud behind the rear wheel so MTBs,
    originally using u brakes, went to cantis. Center pull brakes were
    around for decades and u brakes werte just a modification of those.
    Cantis were a fairly recent developement in the 80s.

  7. Quoted message said:

    On Jul 5, 10:01 am, Qui si parla Campagnolo <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    mariusz said:

    what kind of campagnolo is that ?
    http://www.allegro.pl/item211145213_hamulce_campagnolo.html

    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    Quoted message said:

    As mark mentioned and the brakes are 'u-brakes'. Made obsolete by
    cantilever brakes..different post placement.


    U brakes collected dirt and mud behind the rear wheel so MTBs,
    originally using u brakes, went to cantis. Center pull brakes were
    around for decades and u brakes werte just a modification of those.
    Cantis were a fairly recent developement in the 80s.

    "recent"??? I beg to differ.

    The touring bikes we sold had cantis from our first days (1971) and were
    a common wide-clearance or ultralight solution for twenty years before
    that (Gitane Hosteler up through Bob Jackson Lugano as well as tandems).

    Mountain bikes went canti as soon as the 890/1000 sidepulls proved
    inadequate - and that was several years before most people knew what a
    'mountain bike' was.

    Tom Ritchey's USA 'Commando' and Mike Sinyard's Japanese 'StumpJumper',
    among the very first popular models around 1980, had Mafac cantilevers
    exclusively.

    As volume grew, designers added "U-Brake" bosses at the chainstay, being
    concerned with seatstay flex. The downside problems appeared promptly
    (dirt, as Peter notes - and there are many others!) and they disappeared
    a few years later.

    As another writer noted, Valentino Campagnolo took a lively interest in
    American mountain bikes at the very moment when bike designers were
    obsessing over seatstay flex so their Record OR, Olympus, Euclid series
    included U-Brakes. That was quite au courant. Really!

    Campagnolo also offered cantilever models with all MTB series. Lever
    pull is the same but the frame bosses are not.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.