"Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Yes, I am strictly a side dish on these cycling newsgroups. My only appeal
will be to an intellectual elite. However, it does not hurt a newsgroup to
have an off-topic genius living among them. Surely, it must get extremely
boring to read nothing but cycling related topics.
Sure it hurts them. They don't want it and yet they are in no position to
get you to stop given the nature of the beast. If they wanted politics
they'd go to a politics group and post there. Cyclists go to cycling
newsgroups to read about cycling. If it were boring then there wouldn't be
any cycling newsgroups. The fact that there are so many is proof that many
people do not find it boring. I haven't seen anyone post a message yet that
says "Thank god all this political discussion has saved us from the boring
cycling talk."
Cyclists are interested in politics to the degree that it relates to cycling
such as helmet laws, driving laws, etc. Some of us, such as me, are willing
to dive into your silly little world but most of the cyclists would prefer
to limit the talk to cycling.
Quoted message said:You should not be picking and choosing anything from scripture if you are
not a believer. I never do that myself. Ideally, you ought to be basing
any appeal to morality strictly on humanistic, secular and scientific
terms unconnected to religion. If you can't do this, then you are being
hypocritical.
The fact remains that for the mass of men morality and religion go hand in
hand. In fact, it is the one and only thing I like about any religion.
Its a nice thought, Ed. If only it were true I'd probably be religious
myself. But the reality is that people with power have always felt free to
make their own rules. Apparently they aren't scared by god.
Quoted message said:But you need to know your enemy. I assure you Jeff, if they could, they
would kill you without a moments hesitation. What do you propose to do
about that - other than preach pieties?
What can I do? Kill them first? I don't think so. It won't work. It is not
people but rather an idea that we are fighting. You can't kill ideas with
guns.
Quoted message said:The ideas of the Muslim Jihadists with respect to the West are based
solely on their abominable religion. It why wars of religion have always
been so terrible. Frankly, I am very glad that there is a strong religious
element left in Israel (the Orthodox Jews). They may very well need that
in the end in order to survive.
Nope. They are going to have to work out terms for peace. That does not mean
agreement. It mean you go your way and I go mine. Kind of like what you and
I have done.
Quoted message said:If you were ever to immerse yourself in the study of history you would
soon become convinced at what makes the world go around - and it is NOT
idealism!
You have no credentials to recommend study to anyone when you won't study
yourself. Whatever you've learned has become warped by your opinions. This
is not bad. It happens to all of us but you refuse to let in anything new.
That's not good.
Jeff