Let's all stop this SPAMMER!

Quoted message said:

You know the nike SPAMMER is getting out of control here. I suggest
that if each one of us used the info he supplied in his post
(yahoo messenger ID, and hotmail address) to respond to his desire to
receive messages, he'd be FAR too busy answering phony sales messages
to SPAM RR.
I for one will jam up his yahoo messenger, and send him a few fake
inquiries to his hotmail address using fake name, address, etc. If we
all did this, he'd be busy for months opening messages, and be forced
to change his yahoo messenger ID.
Anyone with me on this?

You really think its just one person?

runsrealfast said:

Quoted message said:

You know the nike SPAMMER is getting out of control here. I suggest
that if each one of us used the info he supplied in his post
(yahoo messenger ID, and hotmail address) to respond to his desire to
receive messages, he'd be FAR too busy answering phony sales messages
to SPAM RR.
I for one will jam up his yahoo messenger, and send him a few fake
inquiries to his hotmail address using fake name, address, etc. If we
all did this, he'd be busy for months opening messages, and be forced
to change his yahoo messenger ID.
Anyone with me on this?

You really think its just one person?

One or more matters not, it's one company, and one email address to
reply to.

Quoted message said:

But I think you missed my point. It would take no effort at all for
each of us to just send one phony email to him using a fake name,
address, and # for him to reply to,

Uhhh I think that there would be a bit of an effort involved, and not
one i'm willing to make.

John

runsrealfast said:

On May 14, 9:08 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

You really think its just one person?

You really think I'M just one person? Try to stop me.

On May 15, 12:36 pm, TheREALBillDavidson <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

runsrealfast said:

On May 14, 9:08 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted message said:

You really think its just one person?

You really think I'M just one person? Try to stop me.

<yawn>

runsrealfast said:

Quoted message said:

But I think you missed my point. It would take no effort at all for
each of us to just send one phony email to him using a fake name,
address, and # for him to reply to,

Uhhh I think that there would be a bit of an effort involved, and not
one i'm willing to make.

John

Well if you feel that way I understand. However by little effort on
our part, I didn't mean taking time to create a fake email and ID,
only to use one you have, reply to him, but give a false name,
address, and phone number (use your imagination here, and think
"someone you REALLY hate" and put in their number) for him to call you
at to arrange a sale. The guy would not only have to read all the
emails, but call each number, only to find out it was the wrong
person, or a phony number.

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 9:55 am, runsrealfast <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

One or more matters not, it's one company, and one email address to
reply to.

The delete key or killfile if anyone feels irked. FWIW - I don't give
a [censored] considering the number of these assine posts.

-D

Quoted message said:

runsrealfast said:

On May 15, 8:53 am, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

But I think you missed my point. It would take no effort at all for
each of us to just send one phony email to him using a fake name,
address, and # for him to reply to,

Quoted message said:

Uhhh I think that there would be a bit of an effort involved, and not
one i'm willing to make.

Quoted message said:

John

Well if you feel that way I understand. However by little effort on
our part, I didn't mean taking time to create a fake email and ID,
only to use one you have, reply to him, but give a false name,
address, and phone number (use your imagination here, and think
"someone you REALLY hate" and put in their number) for him to call you
at to arrange a sale. The guy would not only have to read all the
emails, but call each number, only to find out it was the wrong
person, or a phony number.

Not to mention if we all placed fake orders...

pithydoug said:

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 9:55 am, runsrealfast <[email hidden]> wrote:
One or more matters not, it's one company, and one email address to
reply to.

The delete key or killfile if anyone feels irked. FWIW - I don't give
a [censored] considering the number of these assine posts.

-D

As usual the dummy has spoken. I got news for you, many newsreaders,
and sites like Google, do not have killfiles or blocks.

Quoted message said:

runsrealfast said:

Quoted message said:

But I think you missed my point. It would take no effort at all for
each of us to just send one phony email to him using a fake name,
address, and # for him to reply to,

Uhhh I think that there would be a bit of an effort involved, and not
one i'm willing to make.

John

Well if you feel that way I understand. However by little effort on
our part,

I've already debunked this, so why do you keep repeating it ? Go back and read
the philosophical and practical arguments that explain why your proposal
isn't viable (both in principal and in practice).

Cheers,
--
Elflord

Quoted message said:

pithydoug said:

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 9:55 am, runsrealfast <[email hidden]> wrote:
One or more matters not, it's one company, and one email address to
reply to.

The delete key or killfile if anyone feels irked. FWIW - I don't give
a [censored] considering the number of these assine posts.

-D

As usual the dummy has spoken. I got news for you, many newsreaders,
and sites like Google, do not have killfiles or blocks.

Killfiles are essential for those who don't have enough self-control to
abstain from responding to trolls.

Perhaps you should consider a better newsreader.

Cheers,
--
Elflord

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 12:36 pm, TheREALBillDavidson <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

runsrealfast said:

On May 14, 9:08 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted message said:

You really think its just one person?

You really think I'M just one person? Try to stop me.

<yawn>

There is a certain unintended irony in making a grand theatrical gesture of
what is intended as an expression of indifference. Sometimes, less is more.

Cheers,
--
Elflord

"Elflord" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
: On 2007-05-16, [email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote:
: > On May 15, 12:36 pm, TheREALBillDavidson <[email hidden]>
: > wrote:
: >> On May 15, 8:55 am, runsrealfast <[email hidden]> wrote:
: >>
: >> > On May 14, 9:08 pm, [email hidden] wrote:
: >>
: >> > You really think its just one person?
: >>
: >> You really think I'M just one person? Try to stop me.
: >
: ><yawn>
:
: There is a certain unintended irony in making a grand theatrical gesture
of
: what is intended as an expression of indifference. Sometimes, less is
more.
:
: Cheers,
: --
: Elflord

The Elford has wisdom. Listen to the Elford.

Rather than respond with a YAWN, don't respond at all. Then again, if you
had impulse control, the spam wouldn't both you so much anyway. Margaret
Thatcher in a thong bikini...I mean...sorry, no impulse control here,
either.

Elflord said:

Quoted message said:

runsrealfast said:

On May 15, 8:53 am, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> But I think you missed my point. It would take no effort at all for
> each of us to just send one phony email to him using a fake name,
> address, and # for him to reply to,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Uhhh I think that there would be a bit of an effort involved, and not
one i'm willing to make.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

John

Quoted message said:

Well if you feel that way I understand. However by little effort on
our part,

I've already debunked this, so why do you keep repeating it ? Go back and read
the philosophical and practical arguments that explain why your proposal
isn't viable (both in principal and in practice).

Cheers,
--
Elflord

I did, and you are wrong.

Elflord said:

Quoted message said:

pithydoug said:

On May 15, 10:53 am, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> On May 15, 9:55 am, runsrealfast <[email hidden]> wrote:
> One or more matters not, it's one company, and one email address to
> reply to.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

The delete key or killfile if anyone feels irked. FWIW - I don't give
a [censored] considering the number of these assine posts.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

-D

Quoted message said:

As usual the dummy has spoken. I got news for you, many newsreaders,
and sites like Google, do not have killfiles or blocks.

Killfiles are essential for those who don't have enough self-control to
abstain from responding to trolls.

Perhaps you should consider a better newsreader.

Cheers,
--
Elflord

I'm going to block myself?

Elflord said:

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 12:36 pm, TheREALBillDavidson <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On May 15, 8:55 am, runsrealfast <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> On May 14, 9:08 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> You really think its just one person?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You really think I'M just one person? Try to stop me.

Quoted message said:

<yawn>

There is a certain unintended irony in making a grand theatrical gesture of
what is intended as an expression of indifference. Sometimes, less is more.

Cheers,
--
Elflord

<yawn>

On May 16, 10:51 am, "userfriendly" <[email hidden]>
wrote: : Elflord

Quoted message said:

The Elford has wisdom. Listen to the Elford.

Rather than respond with a YAWN, don't respond at all. Then again, if you
had impulse control, the spam wouldn't both you so much anyway. Margaret
Thatcher in a thong bikini...I mean...sorry, no impulse control here,
either.

He may have wisdom, or maybe just hemoroids. No, just hemoroids.

Elflord said:

Quoted message said:

runsrealfast said:

On May 15, 8:53 am, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> But I think you missed my point. It would take no effort at all for
> each of us to just send one phony email to him using a fake name,
> address, and # for him to reply to,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Uhhh I think that there would be a bit of an effort involved, and not
one i'm willing to make.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

John

Quoted message said:

Well if you feel that way I understand. However by little effort on
our part,

I've already debunked this, so why do you keep repeating it ? Go back and read
the philosophical and practical arguments that explain why your proposal
isn't viable (both in principal and in practice).

Cheers,
--
Elflord

Debunked it? You just spent more time posting to this thread (to no
end means) than if you'd sent the spammer just one email. I'd say you
made an ass of yourself, and not debunked anything.

userfriendly said:

: Elflord

The Elford has wisdom. Listen to the Elford.

Rather than respond with a YAWN, don't respond at all. Then again, if you
had impulse control, the spam wouldn't both you so much anyway. Margaret
Thatcher in a thong bikini...I mean...sorry, no impulse control here,
either.

I heard "the Elford" is deeply in love with Dominick Realbitchy, and
they have an exclusive homosexual relationship going on.