Fanta said:Hi, I am looking for a Heart Rate Monitor able to log my HR during a
workout in its own memory, and then that allows to transfer the log to
a PC to be reviewed and plotted there. With log I mean a recording of
my HR second by second (not just min, max and average figures). Should
be a wrist watch. Can you please advise some brand/model?
I have looked at the Polar web site, but find it confusing; also the
manuals don't give much detail. They mention a "Polar WebLink"
application, but everything I need is to be able to transfer a HR log
into my PC (which may not be connected to the Internet) and plot a
graph there, either with a provided application, or exporting the data
to MS Excel.
Thanks.
I've been using a Polar S625x for going on 3 yrs and really love it. I
usually log by 15-sec intervals, although it can be done by 5-sec
intervals. Even 5 sec is somewhat noisy though. 1-sec intervals are
available on other models. The display is "instantaneous", but what's
saved in the file is just every few seconds. Not sure if you really
meant 1-sec intervals or just something that saved and could download
some sort of reasonably continuous record rather than just averages.
Go to this page
http://tinyurl.com/ccaoj
http://www.polar.fi/polar/channels/eng/comparison/comparison_basic/Running.html
That should bring up a comparison table of their "running" models.
You'll have to expand some of the table portions under there for the
Computer Connectivity and Recording features (after all the Exercise
features).
Look at the RS400/800 (sd or not) models. sd is for speed / distance and
has a footpod (accelerometer) to estimate distance which does
surprisingly well under some circumstances (flat or rolling terrain) and
poorly under other (steep hills, like mountains). Doesn't sound like
you're interested in that. Looks like those 4 models record by 1-sec
intervals. S410 doesn't appear in that table, but you can pull it up
separately.
http://www.polar.fi/polar/channels/eng/segments/products/S410/open.html
It still uses the sonic link, which is ok, but I do prefer the infrared
port (personal preference) since it seems more reliable and faster. I
think it should be able to use the infrared port of your computer, but
sometimes there's compatibility issues (at least there used to be, but
have probably been resolved by now).
The Polar Precision Performance software is far superior to anything
I've seen for the Garmins for heart rate training. But it looks like
they're using Polar ProTrainer 5 for the RS400/800 models, and I have no
idea what that's like. Some of the snapshots look simlar to Precision
Performance, but one (the individual workout) seems to lack some of the
features I like about what I'm using (and didn't like about the gps
software) - but those snapshots are so small, I can't really see the
detail or know if you can change the formatting. Later I was gonna
upload some snapshots from the software I've got to show some of the
logging features (partly in conjunction with another thread where we've
been discussing logging metrics), but if they're not using that software
anymore, it doesn't make any sense to do that.
I started with a 410, but the software with it (PCCoach) was somewhat
limited, but I think Precision Performance now supports it. PCCoach may
have changed also. The 410 was in no-man's land at the time I upgraded
for more features (altimeter, footpod). Melinda may be able to speak
more to the 410.
I suspect the 625 is overkill for what you want since it includes a
barometric altimeter and footpod for distance estimates.
Dot
--
"The goal is training and adaptation, not destruction and injury."
- John Hardy
http://www.mountainrunning.coolrunning.com.au/misc/training.shtml