Neil Brooks said:ETA blowing up the course.
Rasmussen's being kicked off the Danish team now ... at least.
Vino. Oh, why, Vino, why?
Sort of makes you pine for the good old days of amphetamines and coke,
huh?
"You just don't do that on fizzy mineral water and salad."
-Crédit Lyonnais spokesperson
Wonder if the powers that be (UCI/WADA/Tour owners) have considered the
effect the uncertainty in competition is going to have on their
audience. I mean, given somebody's compared the Tour to professional
wrestling, will they realize that it's not just about the drugs? It's
about the arbitrary (to the viewer) application of rules, suspicious
"testing," kicking out the leader when (according to the rules) he's not
subject to expulsion, and kicking out entire teams (two years in a row
now) on suspicions. If professional cycling is not like professional
rasslin', they need to set their rules and stick by them for the whole
competition. Change the rules before next year's races, instead of ex
post facto changes, then manipulating the team to do what they can't.
I'm [censored]. (OK, it's nice that Contadore's in yellow, but it would
mean something if he won it on the road, instead of back-room
arm-twisting he wasn't party to.) I started watching the Tour to see
some scenery, but mostly to watch tough competition. Since it looks
just as crooked as professional wrestling, I'm not watching any more.
Maybe I'll check the Sunday or Monday paper to see who wins.
If my attitude takes over, and German and Swiss TV pulling out makes
that more likely, sponsors and advertisers will dry up. UCI will be hit
hard, and who's going to pay WADA to leak more baseless charges?
Pat