Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Fixed-Gear Bikes: Why?

Started by x · · Last activity · 122 posts · 8,689 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 November 2003
Last activity
1 December 2003
Original author
x
Posts
122
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
8,689
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 122
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (R15757)

    Quoted message said:

    On really bad days your road or mountain bike's derailleurs, cogs, and cables will all freeze up.
    Haven't lived until your freehub stops freehubbing due to extreme ice and muck.

    I guess I've lived a full life then.

    Love the fixie, many miles covered when I lived in the GFN for those above reasons plus not ruining
    nice Campy parts. Much fun to ride FG on hardpack/ice, it's harder to pucker at the sight of "glass"
    while pedaling. But the messenger thing is still as previously stated. --TP

  2. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these guys are
    doing it.

    oldskooltrack.comskids.frame.html

    messengers.orgdexter.html

  3. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    Went into the city today, and noticed at least a half-dozen bike messengers riding fixed-gear
    bikes. Some with a brake, some without. Most with cages and straps instead of clipless.

    What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these guys are
    doing it.

    Bicycling machismo, mostly. Many people rhapsodize about how riding a brakeless fixed gear improves
    their perceptions, yadda yadda yadda. It may even be true! I think the original impetus was for
    bike messengers to have bikes that were (1) cheap and (2) unattractive to thieves. There is a large
    cool factor.

    I ride my track bike as my commuter bike nowadays, but with a Bendix coaster brake wheel rather than
    a fixed gear. It's fun and feels marginally safer to me than no brakes. Bike messengers have done
    double takes when they see me coasting on my obviously brakeless track bike.

    See www.oldskooltrack.com, www.fixedgearfever.com, etc.

  4. "(Pete Cresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Went into the city today, and noticed at least a half-dozen bike messengers riding fixed-gear
    bikes. Some with a brake, some without. Most with cages and straps instead of clipless.

    What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these guys are
    doing it.

    They're light, low maintainence, and theft-resistant.

    I work across the street from one of Portland's messenger hangouts. The fixed gear bikes are
    distinctive- a thief would have to be pretty ballsy to steal one. He (she) probably couldn't fence
    it easily- who wants a bike that won't coast?

    Cages and straps make sense when you're running in and out of buildings, up and down stairs. Even
    SPD shoes have problems with marble staircases.

    Of the bikes I see regularly, I'd guess that 30% are fixed-gear track bikes, 30% are fixed-gear
    converted road bikes, 30% are conventional derailleur bikes, and then there's the cargo bikes like
    this: efn.orglonghaul.htm

    Jeff

  5. No one yet has mentioned the superior track stance capability - highly desirable for messengers and fun for everyone else.

    Still, the "purist form of cycling" argument is my favorite.

  6. [email hidden] (Tom Paterson) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    What's practical about not being able to coast around corners so you can go faster and make more
    deliveries/$$$ in a day? What's practical about not having a range of gears to reduce fatigue and
    increase speed? What's practical about having to ride slow because you don't have any brakes on
    your bike? What's practical about increasing your "exposure" while paying for your own accident
    injuries (minus workers' comp, ha ha).

    It's mostly just an ego trip/peer pressure thing.

    um,.. no?

    is the previous bitter paragraph referring specifically to fixies in general, or fixies sans brakes?

    first, raw speed is only one component of 'practical'. a person who is bored of cycling isn't going
    to be time efficient.

    second, ill put money down that in a reasonably terrained city i could put time on myself riding
    fixed vs. free.

    no clipping out and in at lights, no drivetrain tweaking, no pondering gear selections and slipping
    gears, no sulking disenchanting freewheel boredom.

    (and i can assure you that for a messenger, the limits on speed between drops is not going to be the
    maximum lean angle around corners. and if you're feeling vulnerable and 'exposed' riding fixed, it
    means you're not used to it yet.)

    anthony

  7. Okay, but what I want to know, is how do they gear these fix-gear bikes? Are they on the low side,
    and do they spin like crazy? Or what?

    - Stan Shankman

    "(Pete Cresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Went into the city today, and noticed at least a half-dozen bike messengers riding fixed-gear
    bikes. Some with a brake, some without. Most with cages and straps instead of clipless.

    What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these guys are
    doing it.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  8. Pete-<< What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these
    guys are doing it. >><BR><BR>

    They are - -fun -practical in pisspoor weather(nothing to get crudded up) -good for short training
    periods, as they make ya pedal all the time, pedal smoothly -cheap

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  9. Stan-<< Okay, but what I want to know, is how do they gear these fix-gear bikes? Are they on the low
    side, and do they spin like crazy? Or what? >><BR><BR>

    42 or 44 in front, about a 16t in the rear, what ever gear inches that works out to-

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  10. Stan Shankman <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : Okay, but what I want to know, is how do they gear these fix-gear bikes? Are they on the low side,
    : and do they spin like crazy? Or what?

    usually in the 60 or 70 gear inch range. mine is 48/17 (76"😉 at the moment. which is about 90 rpms
    at 20.5mph or 132 rpms at 30mph. the local terrain is relatively flat (boise, idaho) .. well, unless
    you head into the hills where it sure isn't, but i don't do that on this bike. ;-) there are at
    least 2 other fixed gears in town that i know of.
    --
    david reuteler [email hidden]

  11. "(Pete Cresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Short answer: Feels Good!

    What's your perception of the danger factor?

    Seems like the rider is in deep doo-doo if a foot comes off a pedal while underway.

    Nah. The first time I rode a fixer I spun my feet off on a steep downhill. No problem, I just rode a
    while holding my feet out to the side. Downhills are the only tricky part of fixed gear riding,
    there's a sense of panic in the beginning when your feet start moving too fast. You get over it. You
    don't want to drop a chain on a fixer though. In the beginning, you have "fixer moments", like
    "clipless moments", when you forget you can't coast. These don't result in anything more than a
    brief startle. It's still a good idea to take your first few rides solo with benign road conditions,
    just until your reflexes adjust (much like learning clipless). After that, even switching bikes
    doesn't seem to present any problems, everything becomes reflexive.

    You know how good a bike feels with a brand new drivetrain? A fixer feels better than that with a
    dirty and worn one. A well set up and maintained bike feels like an extension of your body. When you
    return to a derailer bike, even a nice one, it feels hopelessly clumsy.

    The advantages of derailers are overrated. Fixed gear bikes are not much slower even on courses
    favoring derailer bikes. I've done rolling terrain time trials on both, and figure there's less than
    a 10% speed disadvantage. For stop & go riding, or flattish roads, fixed gear bikes are at least as
    fast as multi-speed bikes.

    From a utilitarian POV, fixers are very economical. That is if you don't set one up with all the
    chi-chi boutique parts that are becoming so common. Ideally, you make a fixer by taking a derailer
    bike and throwing stuff away. A dumpster 10/12 speed bike becomes an svelte, elegant, machine once
    liberated from all that [censored].

    Messengers don't make a lot of money, and certainly would have to worry about an expensive bike
    being stolen. Those issues make fixers, especially conversions, a no-brainer. For
    commuting/recreational/fitness riders, fixers in the winter simplify maintenance, eliminate a bunch
    of mechanical problems, and give a better workout during shorter riding hours.

  12. The Fixedgear Gallery:= Web Site: fixedgeargallery.comfixedgeargallery.com

    Some of the regulars of rec.bicycles.tech in the Gallery, I'm sure there are many more:

    418 Suzy Jackson's Bitsa 413 Peter Chisholm's Calfe 313 Tom's Scorcher

    -tom

    "(Pete Cresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Went into the city today, and noticed at least a half-dozen bike


    messengers

    Quoted message said:

    riding fixed-gear bikes. Some with a brake, some without. Most with


    cages

    Quoted message said:

    and straps instead of clipless.

    What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these guys are
    doing it.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  13. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    Went into the city today, and noticed at least a half-dozen bike messengers riding fixed-gear
    bikes. Some with a brake, some without. Most with cages and straps instead of clipless.

    What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these guys are
    doing it.

    1) Kudos, because you can handle it
    2) Easy trackstands at traffic lights, although true messengers would ignore them
    3) Less to go wrong
    4) Much lighter weight - no gears, less chain, one brake (or no brakes at all - some of the NYC
    messengers really are that mad)
    5) Not the easiest bike for a passerby to steal, because most people wouldn't be able to ride one
    without practice.

  14. "Video barbam et pallium; philosophum nondum video". - Gellius

    Peter Chisholm said:

    Pete-<< Seems like the rider is in deep doo-doo if a foot comes off a pedal while underway.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Not really and like all things, this takes a little skill, technique and finese-

    I think you do a real disservice by dismissing the potential for mischief if you pull a foot at
    speed. At high cadences, the resulting imbalance can, and often has, caused even highly accomplished
    track sprinters to crash. Occasionally you hear of someone riding one of these incidents out, but
    that's hardly the norm.

    Try it yourself: spin 'em up to 140 rpm or more, then disengage one pedal. Get back to me (once
    you're able to again) with the result.
    -------------------------------
    John Dacey Business Cycles, Miami, Florida Now in our twenty-first year. Our catalog of track
    equipment: eighth year online. businesscycles.combusinesscycles.com

  15. "Stan Shankman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Okay, but what I want to know, is how do they gear these fix-gear bikes? Are they on the low side,
    and do they spin like crazy? Or what?

    - Stan Shankman

    They're geared however the rider likes.

  16. "Stan Shankman" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Okay, but what I want to know, is how do they gear these fix-gear bikes? Are they on the low side,
    and do they spin like crazy? Or what?


    It varies, of course. I'd say that most choose gears around 75 to 80 inches. I commute in hilly
    Seattle, and out of curiosity, bought a fixed-gear cheap on eBay. It was geared at 81 inches. On
    level terrain, that would be OK, but it was a struggle on uphills. If I changed it to a decent
    climbing gear, say 60 inches, I'd have to ride the brakes on the downhills to keep from spinning
    out, and what fun is it to brake on downhills?

    So I converted it to a single-speed with gearing of 68 inches. I sought 64, but the rear cog to give
    me 64 was not in stock, and the 68 is pretty good. I chose my ratio by spending a couple of days
    with my multi-speed bikes on my typical rides, just putting them into my best estimate of the most
    versatile single gear, and then not shifting all day.

    In general, I prefer my multi-speed bikes, but the SS makes a nice change of pace. I have to 'rush'
    the uphills, and it is more of a leg strength sort of a ride. I also like the simpler appearance of
    these bikes. I've also added fenders and a rear rack, and I'm trying it out in the role of foul
    weather winter commuter, which I expect will be it's permanent niche.

    Erik Brooks, Seattle

  17. In article <[email hidden]>, "Stan Shankman"

    Quoted message said:

    Okay, but what I want to know, is how do they gear these fix-gear bikes? Are they on the low side,
    and do they spin like crazy? Or what?

    Many folks are a bit high of "medium" whatever that is for them. When I commuted on a geared bike, I
    used the 42x17 almost exclusively, so much so that if I tried to shift it often wouldn't. Part of my
    decision to switch to fixed for commuting was from only using that one gear, the other part is when
    my BB shell cracked, so I needed to replace the bike and decided to try fixed, knowing I could
    switch to singel speed if that didn't work. I set it up with a 42x15 thinking I might want to move
    to a 40 in front, but it's been 5 years and I'm still happy with that gear for my fairly flat 3.25
    mile each way commute. 42x16 is a bit more common, I tend to like slightly higher gears. I went with
    a front brake too but do see folks around here who go brakeless, especially so the messengers in San
    Francisco.

    This: <http://www.stanford.edu/~dru/fixie.html> doesn't show that I've switched to a Brooks Champion
    Flyer, but is otherwise accurate, especially the pics showing how filthy my bike generally is.

    Drew

    --
    Drew W. Saunders

    dru (at) stanford (dot) eee dee you

  18. "Stan Shankman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Okay, but what I want to know, is how do they gear these fix-gear bikes? Are they on the low side,
    and do they spin like crazy? Or what?

    - Stan Shankman

    I don't know how "they" gear theirs, but mine is geared to suit me at
    48/18, equating to about 73 inches. Low enough for small hills, but comfortable on the
    flat at 20mph.

    But, don't worry about what others do, try it and then do what suits you. You can get a fair idea of
    what you need by simply riding round in one gear without freewheeling on a geared bike - what you
    need to know is what will just get you up the steepest hill you are likely to encounter, then go
    from there.

    Andrew Webster

  19. [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Pete-<< What's the attraction of fixed-gear. I'm guessing it must be something practical if these
    guys are doing it. >><BR><BR>

    They are - -fun -practical in pisspoor weather(nothing to get crudded up) -good for short training
    periods, as they make ya pedal all the time, pedal smoothly

    Ah, there is one more reason that may have been overlooked....(Apart from the benefits that Mr.
    Vecchio pointed out)

    Thieves are less interested in ripping off a fixie. Harder to ride, no resale value, etc.

    Just my thought.....

    Jay

  20. DiabloScott <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    No one yet has mentioned the superior track stance capability - highly desirable for messengers
    and fun for everyone else.

    I commute into downtown Seattle, wait for multiple lights every day, and have developed the ability
    to do a good trackstand. When I got my fixie, I expected that it would be better in this way, but
    that was not my experience - I found it harder. On a bike that freewheels, I have far more control
    over the PLACE where I 'make my stand', and that's important to trackstands, at least to me. I need
    to get my left crank pointed forwards and close to horizontal, and the wheel turned into a little
    uphill if possible, as it usually is. On the fixie, I'm really limited in this regard. The gearing
    was also too high to make rocking back and forth easy.

    I see lots of messengers here with fixies, and they've clearly overcome the difficulties I
    encountered, but IMHO trackstands are harder on fixed. YMMV. BTW, I converted my fixie to
    single-speed, and trackstands are easy again.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.