azul_fahrrad said:I know the pain I have felt playing rugby, football, boxing, running, cycling. I have boxed 4 rounds with a broken nose, I played an entire season of football with a broken collar bone, I have played 3 quarters to finish out a football game with a torn ligament in my knee. I have some idea of what pain is.
So? You talked as if the drugs were all about pain. It's not. And you talked as if cyclist don't experience the rich pain that other athletic gamesmen experience, which is complete BS. And now, you want to play a pain suffering comparison contest?
azul_fahrrad said:What is dumbfounding is those who think that their knowledge, understanding and wisdom can trump the opinions, views or experiences everyone else despite lacking any foundation on which to speak or at the very least any more of a foundation than those they seem to think they trump.
This is true insofar as your belief that other sports are "cleaner." You have no factual basis for this. None. Therefore, the idea is only "faith" to you, far from fact. The FACT is that no other sport comes anywhere close to testing like cycling does. Not a single other sport or athletic game. Cycling does more tests by several orders of magnitude more than every other sport, and it doesn't matter how you couch those stats: total number of tests; average total number of tests per competitor; or whatever. In fact, it is cycling that is leading the charge and leading the development of testing regimes and methods.
The reason so many cyclists are being caught is because so many are being tested. If every other sport tested as rigorously, then you would see the number of athletes "caught" in each sport go way up. That is a fact.
azul_fahrrad said:All sports have always had cheaters, neither I nor anyone else contest that point.
No, actually you did say and imply that hockey, boxing, and other sports don't have the same problems. You did say they were cleaner. Moreover, you implied that your personal experience showed that "athletes" in these other sports were of higher integrity than cyclists and would not dope. Such a statement is untenable on its face.
azul_fahrrad said:Not all sports have deteriorated to the point that Cycling or the big 3 have. Other sports don't test as much because the problem simply as big or widespread.
Yeah, right. And if cycling didn't do all of the testing it does, then all of the cyclists who've been caught in recent years would still be racing, and cycling would seem much more clean.
You have zero facts on your side with this claim. How do these other sports know they don't have a problem if they don't test as rigorously as cycling, eh? You can't. That is a fact, one you can't argue around.
azul_fahrrad said:Pro football and basketball players have seem to project an attitude of superiority, of being above reproach and that is echoed as their personal live spill out into courtrooms and newspapers. It is creeping into pro baseball. Doping in pro cycling seems to be more out of desperation than anything else.
The different reasons for doping or drub abuse in ANY sport are the same. People that play baseball or basketball or not different than any other athletes or sportsmen. Such an idea shows a terrible bias.
azul_fahrrad said:I don't who [censored] in your Wheaties but if you wish to continue your personal attack on me, you should get to know me first so that your comments will at least be more accurate.
No one [censored] in my Wheaties, thank you. If you aren't prepared to have your ideas challenged, then don't post them in public forums.