jim beam vs the world

Quoted post said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

Jim seems to have mellowed of late. He seems to be making more sense.
Maybe because Jobst han't been posting as much, Jim doesn't feel
compelled to disagree for the sake of disagreeing.

Jim is free to disagree with me.

Quoted message said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons.

Sounds like you need a career change.

Hank Wirtz said:

Quoted post said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

Jim seems to have mellowed of late. He seems to be making more sense.
Maybe because Jobst han't been posting as much, Jim doesn't feel
compelled to disagree for the sake of disagreeing.

Isn't Jobst off on his annual alpine cycling vacation?

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Quoted message said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.

works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.

jim beam said:

Quoted message said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.

works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.

Not trying to sound like a suck up, but I have learned more of value
from JB than most of the other so called experts around here.

The background entertainment is just an added plus.

In article
<[email hidden]>,

jim beam said:

Quoted message said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.

works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.

Suppose someone chose you. How would you know?

--
Michael Press

Quoted post said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

Some of the responses are priceless.......

Michael Press said:

In article
<[email hidden]>,

jim beam said:

Quoted message said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.

works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.

Suppose someone chose you. How would you know?

the day i start pulling metal fatigue solutions out of my ass [or start
spewing other underinformed [censored] like "dye penetrant proves
anodizing causes rim cracking" for example] then i'm fair game.

jim beam said:

Michael Press said:

In article
<[email hidden]>,
jim beam <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] wrote:
> I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
> which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
> Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
> find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
> between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
> wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
> call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
> afternoons.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Thx,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Andres

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.

Quoted message said:

Suppose someone chose you. How would you know?

the day i start pulling metal fatigue solutions out of my ass [or start
spewing other underinformed [censored] like "dye penetrant proves
anodizing causes rim cracking" for example] then i'm fair game.

Ahhhh, yes! See, that is what I am talking about. Please give us more.

Quoted message said:

jim beam said:

Michael Press said:

In article
<[email hidden]>,
jim beam <[email hidden]> wrote:
> [email hidden] wrote:
>> I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
>> which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
>> Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
>> find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
>> between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
>> wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
>> call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
>> afternoons.
>> Thx,
>> Andres
> you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
> simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.
> works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
> happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
> bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.
Suppose someone chose you. How would you know?

the day i start pulling metal fatigue solutions out of my ass [or start
spewing other underinformed [censored] like "dye penetrant proves
anodizing causes rim cracking" for example] then i'm fair game.

Ahhhh, yes! See, that is what I am talking about. Please give us more.

get a life andres.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.

works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.

Can't [censored] a bullshitter, can ya?

;D

D'ohBoy

D'ohBoy said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> you don't need me son - you can have plenty of fun on your own account.
> simply pick a bullshitter, then call them on it.
>
> works much better if they're bullshitting on a subject on which you
> happen to have expertise. if they're retarded enough to keep
> bullshitting in defense, that's just gravy.

Can't [censored] a bullshitter, can ya?

of course you can! if someone knows their subject, they don't have to
[censored] and in turn, they're not susceptible to it. but since a
bullshitter doesn't know what they're talking about, there's knowledge
gaps into which you can feed them all kinds of [censored] when presented artfully.

email hidden said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Thx,

Andres

We love Jim Beam. Don't change a thing! UDAMAN!

Fritz said:

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:23:30 -0700, "[email hidden]"

Quoted message said:

I am bored right now, so I was searching for the latest messages in
which jb argues with everyone and then ends up calling people names.
Those threads are kind of fun during long afternoons. I didn't seem to
find anything today. I was wondering if there weren't any arguments
between jb and others today that I may have missed. Also, jb, I was
wondering if you could argue, at least daily, with a few people and
call them names. That will provide some amusement during slow
afternoons.

Quoted message said:

Thx,

Quoted message said:

Andres

We love Jim Beam. Don't change a thing! UDAMAN!

Agreed. If there were no "Jim Beam" we would have to invent him.

Nigel Grinter
Well-Spoken Wheels Inc.
(wellspokenwheels.com)

in rec.bicycles.tech said:

Agreed. If there were no "Jim Beam" we would have to invent him.

All newsgroups *must* have one or more trolls; it's required by the
charter.

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
says...

Quoted message said:

in rec.bicycles.tech said:

Agreed. If there were no "Jim Beam" we would have to invent him.

All newsgroups *must* have one or more trolls; it's required by the
charter.

You must be talking about this thread's originator, not JB.

In article <[email hidden]>,

RBrickston said:

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
says...

Quoted message said:

in rec.bicycles.tech said:

Agreed. If there were no "Jim Beam" we would have to invent him.

All newsgroups *must* have one or more trolls; it's required by the
charter.

You must be talking about this thread's originator, not JB.

Neither jb nor JB (let's keep them straight) are trolls. Contentious
and argumentative at times, yes, but not trolls.

in rec.bicycles.tech RBrickston said:

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
says...

Quoted message said:

in rec.bicycles.tech said:

Agreed. If there were no "Jim Beam" we would have to invent him.

All newsgroups *must* have one or more trolls; it's required by the
charter.

You must be talking about this thread's originator, not JB.

Not talkin' 'bout anybody.

Tim McNamara said:

Neither jb nor JB (let's keep them straight) are trolls. Contentious
and argumentative at times, yes, but not trolls.

Yes, and for that reason both are equally valuable.
I neither like nor dislike either one, nor will I automatically accept
or deny either's opinion.
But there there is nothing I despise more than the attitude of "I
have *data* on subject x, therefor my *opinion* on subject y is not
refutable."
JB is the king of this. The worst part is he apparently is not even
aware of when he switches into this mode.

DR