plenty of people are trying to send me greeting cards.
I've been getting a ton of those lately. They want you to download a virus/trojan that turns your machine into one of their own personal spam generators.
-sw
Too bad these people do not use their skills in a positive way.
plenty of people are trying to send me greeting cards.
I've been getting a ton of those lately. They want you to download a virus/trojan that turns your machine into one of their own personal spam generators.
-sw
lately i've been getting e-mails with just a header and a .pdf attachment. i don't open them, but can a virus hide in one?
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:18:28 GMT, blake murphy <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Steve Wertz said:
Becca said:
plenty of people are trying to send me greeting cards.
I've been getting a ton of those lately. They want you to download a virus/trojan that turns your machine into one of their own personal spam generators.
-sw
lately i've been getting e-mails with just a header and a .pdf attachment. i don't open them, but can a virus hide in one?
lately i've been getting e-mails with just a header and a .pdf attachment. i don't open them, but can a virus hide in one?
I doubt it, especially since I use FoxIt PDF reader rather than Adobe.
I have my mail server (fastmail.fm) set to discard any incoming mails that have blank subjects or contain PDF's or ZIP's. Now they're sending JPG's and GIF's.
Please don't rename threads unless you're changing the topic of discussion. I don't know how other newsreaders work, but Agent threads posts by title, so now I have a screen FULL of 'can I be your dowager' (Fred) etc mini-threads... there was nothing wrong with the original thread, but now it's broken up into a billion parts instead of neatly together.
How about just starting new threads instead of hijacking existing ones?
How about people just emailing the personal responses to the other party directly instead? Wouldn't that be more direct and save everyone else any trouble?
Good idea, although many people post no valid Email address because of spam. I post a valid address. I got a half dozen identical spams this morning. It was pretty easy to delete them.
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:57:49 -0500, Omelet <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I generally do key word killfiles or simply pick "kill this subject".
Me too. I kill nothing in my email and I'd get bored reading the list if I had any more options than subject and author in my news reader. Key word kills come when the authors & subjects morph and return.
--
Ham and eggs. A day's work for the chicken, a lifetime commitment for the pig.
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:57:49 -0500, Omelet <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I generally do key word killfiles or simply pick "kill this subject".
Me too. I kill nothing in my email and I'd get bored reading the list if I had any more options than subject and author in my news reader. Key word kills come when the authors & subjects morph and return.
I find "newsgroups" to be helpful in some cases. That's how I got rid of Chung, who changed subjects and his name quite often, but *always* crossposted to sci.med.cardiology.
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:57:49 -0500, Omelet <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I generally do key word killfiles or simply pick "kill this subject".
Me too. I kill nothing in my email and I'd get bored reading the list if I had any more options than subject and author in my news reader. Key word kills come when the authors & subjects morph and return.
I find "newsgroups" to be helpful in some cases. That's how I got rid of Chung, who changed subjects and his name quite often, but *always* crossposted to sci.med.cardiology.
I'm not sure if this old version of my newsreader can do that. Just doing key word kills did the trick for me.
--
Ham and eggs. A day's work for the chicken, a lifetime commitment for the pig.
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:57:49 -0500, Omelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>I generally do key word killfiles or simply pick "kill this subject".
Me too. I kill nothing in my email and I'd get bored reading the list if I had any more options than subject and author in my news reader. Key word kills come when the authors & subjects morph and return.
I find "newsgroups" to be helpful in some cases. That's how I got rid of Chung, who changed subjects and his name quite often, but *always* crossposted to sci.med.cardiology.
I'm not sure if this old version of my newsreader can do that. Just doing key word kills did the trick for me.
sf, you might look into newsproxy, which i think can do this. it can also filter anything cross-posted to more than x number of groups, which i've found handles chung pretty nicely. it's a program you launch before launching agent, and it does a pre-screening before agent's own filters kick in. it can be used with other newsreaders and o.e., netscape and some other browsers as well.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:35:25 GMT, blake murphy <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
sf said:
I'm not sure if this old version of my newsreader can do that. Just doing key word kills did the trick for me.
sf, you might look into newsproxy, which i think can do this. it can also filter anything cross-posted to more than x number of groups, which i've found handles chung pretty nicely. it's a program you launch before launching agent, and it does a pre-screening before agent's own filters kick in. it can be used with other newsreaders and o.e., netscape and some other browsers as well.