Road Cycling · Public discussion

Do complete bikes come with uncut steerers?

Started by Gooserider · · Last activity · 8 posts · 728 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
15 August 2007
Last activity
19 August 2007
Original author
Gooserider
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
728
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've only bought one complete bike. I bought it from an internet bike
    company, and it came with the steer tube cut. I have carpal tunnel syndrome,
    so I need the bars up. My last two purchases have been framesets I had built
    up, so I was able to keep the steerers long. However, Raleigh has a couple
    of bikes coming out that look promising---but if they're going to come with
    the steer tube cut it makes dialing in my fit more expensive(meaning I'll
    have to spring for a new stem). Anybody know?

    Mike

  2. Gooserider said:

    I've only bought one complete bike. I bought it from an internet bike
    company, and it came with the steer tube cut. I have carpal tunnel syndrome,
    so I need the bars up. My last two purchases have been framesets I had built
    up, so I was able to keep the steerers long. However, Raleigh has a couple
    of bikes coming out that look promising---but if they're going to come with
    the steer tube cut it makes dialing in my fit more expensive(meaning I'll
    have to spring for a new stem). Anybody know?


    Most are cut AFAIK. Just get a stem raiser for $20. Not pretty, but
    they work great.

    http://www.deltacycle.com/product.php?g=9

  3. Quoted message said:

    I've only bought one complete bike. I bought it from an internet bike
    company, and it came with the steer tube cut. I have carpal tunnel
    syndrome, so I need the bars up. My last two purchases have been framesets
    I had built up, so I was able to keep the steerers long. However, Raleigh
    has a couple of bikes coming out that look promising---but if they're
    going to come with the steer tube cut it makes dialing in my fit more
    expensive(meaning I'll have to spring for a new stem). Anybody know?

    Mike

    All bikes I know of from major bike companies have the steer tubes pre-cut
    to a length their engineers figure to be the maximum safe height allowed.
    I've spoken with engineers at Trek regarding customers with special needs
    who would like to have a longer fork column; invariably, they say no, it's
    not safe to have more than 4cm of exposed (acutally covered by spacers) fork
    column beneath the stem.

    What I don't understand is why it's OK to have a stem with a very steep
    upward angle, positioning the bar quite a bit higher than normal... but it's
    not OK to use a taller fork column with a lower stem (to achieve the same
    position). Don't think I've asked that exact question; I'll try to remember
    to next time.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  4. Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've only bought one complete bike. I bought it from an internet bike
    company, and it came with the steer tube cut. I have carpal tunnel
    syndrome, so I need the bars up. My last two purchases have been framesets
    I had built up, so I was able to keep the steerers long. However, Raleigh
    has a couple of bikes coming out that look promising---but if they're
    going to come with the steer tube cut it makes dialing in my fit more
    expensive(meaning I'll have to spring for a new stem). Anybody know?

    Mike

    All bikes I know of from major bike companies have the steer tubes pre-cut
    to a length their engineers figure to be the maximum safe height allowed.
    I've spoken with engineers at Trek regarding customers with special needs
    who would like to have a longer fork column; invariably, they say no, it's
    not safe to have more than 4cm of exposed (acutally covered by spacers) fork
    column beneath the stem.

    Is this not an argument for larger diameter steerer tubes?

    Quoted message said:

    What I don't understand is why it's OK to have a stem with a very steep
    upward angle, positioning the bar quite a bit higher than normal... but it's
    not OK to use a taller fork column with a lower stem (to achieve the same
    position). Don't think I've asked that exact question; I'll try to remember
    to next time.

    Hmmm..., the bike in my bedroom has a 38-cm tall stem. Of course, I do
    not apply much force to it while riding.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  5. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've only bought one complete bike. I bought it from an internet bike
    company, and it came with the steer tube cut. I have carpal tunnel
    syndrome, so I need the bars up. My last two purchases have been
    framesets I had built up, so I was able to keep the steerers long.
    However, Raleigh has a couple of bikes coming out that look
    promising---but if they're going to come with the steer tube cut it makes
    dialing in my fit more expensive(meaning I'll have to spring for a new
    stem). Anybody know?

    Mike

    All bikes I know of from major bike companies have the steer tubes pre-cut
    to a length their engineers figure to be the maximum safe height allowed.
    I've spoken with engineers at Trek regarding customers with special needs
    who would like to have a longer fork column; invariably, they say no, it's
    not safe to have more than 4cm of exposed (acutally covered by spacers)
    fork column beneath the stem.

    What I don't understand is why it's OK to have a stem with a very steep
    upward angle, positioning the bar quite a bit higher than normal... but
    it's not OK to use a taller fork column with a lower stem (to achieve the
    same position). Don't think I've asked that exact question; I'll try to
    remember to next time.

    Thanks, Mike. I can almost understand their concern, if it's a carbon
    steerer. But the two bikes I have now have steel forks and I don't think I
    could bend the steerers with a hammer and a vice. :-)

  6. Gooserider said:

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've only bought one complete bike. I bought it from an internet bike
    company, and it came with the steer tube cut. I have carpal tunnel
    syndrome, so I need the bars up. My last two purchases have been
    framesets I had built up, so I was able to keep the steerers long.
    However, Raleigh has a couple of bikes coming out that look
    promising---but if they're going to come with the steer tube cut it makes
    dialing in my fit more expensive(meaning I'll have to spring for a new
    stem). Anybody know?

    Mike


    All bikes I know of from major bike companies have the steer tubes pre-cut
    to a length their engineers figure to be the maximum safe height allowed.
    I've spoken with engineers at Trek regarding customers with special needs
    who would like to have a longer fork column; invariably, they say no, it's
    not safe to have more than 4cm of exposed (acutally covered by spacers)
    fork column beneath the stem.

    What I don't understand is why it's OK to have a stem with a very steep
    upward angle, positioning the bar quite a bit higher than normal... but
    it's not OK to use a taller fork column with a lower stem (to achieve the
    same position). Don't think I've asked that exact question; I'll try to
    remember to next time.

    Thanks, Mike. I can almost understand their concern, if it's a carbon
    steerer. But the two bikes I have now have steel forks and I don't think I
    could bend the steerers with a hammer and a vice. :-)


    Why would you TRY to bend them?

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    All bikes I know of from major bike companies have the steer tubes
    pre-cut to a length their engineers figure to be the maximum safe height
    allowed. I've spoken with engineers at Trek regarding customers with
    special needs who would like to have a longer fork column; invariably,
    they say no, it's not safe to have more than 4cm of exposed (acutally
    covered by spacers) fork column beneath the stem.

    What I don't understand is why it's OK to have a stem with a very steep
    upward angle, positioning the bar quite a bit higher than normal... but
    it's not OK to use a taller fork column with a lower stem (to achieve the
    same position). Don't think I've asked that exact question; I'll try to
    remember to next time.

    Thanks, Mike. I can almost understand their concern, if it's a carbon
    steerer. But the two bikes I have now have steel forks and I don't think I
    could bend the steerers with a hammer and a vice. :-)

    The steer tubes in question have been aluminum, since Trek has been
    reluctant to use carbon steer tubes (they're concerned people are going to
    crank down on them too hard during stem installation and cause damage). A
    steel steer tube is still of concern, since they're substantially thinner
    than aluminum. When we went from 1" steel to 1 1/8" aluminum, we gained
    strength & overall durability (less likely to bend in a crash). Leveraging
    out a 1" steer tube beyond its design, even if steel, could still result in
    bad consequences. My feeling is that it's more likely to be an issue for a
    bike ridden off-road though.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Mike

    Jacoubowsky said:

    What I don't understand is why it's OK to have a stem with a very steep
    upward angle, positioning the bar quite a bit higher than normal... but it's
    not OK to use a taller fork column with a lower stem (to achieve the same
    position).

    My instinctual reaction is that it has to do with the bending moment of
    the length of steerer tube exposed above the top of the head tube. The
    length of steerer tube within the head tube is restrained at both ends,
    therefore there are no internal bending forces to resist. From the head
    tube up, the steerer tube is acting as a vertical cantilever. Force is
    applied to the stem from the weight of the rider on the handlebars
    which creates a bending moment in the steerer tube.

    Your former instance has a shorter cantilever to the point of applied
    force, therefore less bending moment. If the length of steerer tube
    exposed in the latter instance became too great, I can even see the
    internal portion of the steerer tube bowing because the connection at
    the top of the head tube really isn't rigid, and at some point would
    begin to act as a fulcrum.

    But the difference in lengths being discussed in your example is so
    minimal compared to the diameter of the tube that this is probably just
    a theoretical pile of [censored].

    FWIW,

    Dan

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.