UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Why Does Vandeman ALWAYS Resort to INVENTING THREATS AND VIOLENCE?

Started by Chris · · Last activity · 5 posts · 496 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
14 September 2007
Last activity
17 September 2007
Original author
Chris
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
496
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. < snip van-DUH-mans BS>

    Quoted message said:

    Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

    I will keep it as simple as I can for you.

    1) You made an assertion (Black bears attack to protect cubs)
    2) Your assertion was proven to be wrong
    http://www.bear.org/Black/Black_Bear_Facts.html
    3) I ask a simple question "why cant you admit you were wrong"

    Question 1) How is that irrational?
    Question 2) Why cant you admit you were wrong?

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  2. On 14 Sep 2007 15:58:47 GMT, Chris <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    < snip van-DUH-mans BS>

    Quoted message said:

    Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

    I will keep it as simple as I can for you.

    After CONVENIENTLY removing the context, so no one can see just how
    STOOPID you are.
    --
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  3. Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    On 14 Sep 2007 15:58:47 GMT, Chris <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    < snip van-DUH-mans BS>

    Quoted message said:

    Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

    I will keep it as simple as I can for you.

    After CONVENIENTLY removing the context, so no one can see just how
    STOOPID you are.

    OK van-DUH-man here is the old thread:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>Mike,
    >>>> In the thread "Black bear attacks mountain biker in Washington
    >>>> State
    >>>>park" your statement that black bears attack to defend their
    >>>>young. This assertion was proven wrong by two different people
    >>>>using two different lines of reasoning.
    >>>>
    >>>> Simply put: You were wrong!
    >>>
    >>> BS. Unless you are a bear, you don't know why they attack.
    >>>
    >>>> If you were wrong then, how can I take anything you write
    >>>> seriously??
    >>>>
    >>>> Who is in for a rude awaking?? I think it is all of us.
    >>
    >>You can stick your head in the sand all you want. Your assertion
    >>was proven wrong. Didnt you even read the replies to your stupid
    >>statement. I will cut and paste it again for you and all to read
    >>once again:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>From a long list of characteristics, the last one listed
    >>at <http://www.bear.org/Black/Black_Bear_Facts.html> is
    >>
    >> Greatest misconception:
    >>
    >> The greatest misconception about black bears is that
    >> they are likely to attack people in defense of cubs.
    >> They are highly unlikely to do this.
    >
    > So they MIGHT do it. QED Can't you read?

    And a meteor MIGHT hit you in the forehead, but alas, it probably
    won't. You love to streatch the truth a bit to fit your odd sense of
    the world.

    Remember, I am not a mountain biker, therefore; you can not say "Why
    Do Mountain Bikers ALWAYS Resort to THREATS AND VIOLENCE?"

    But you are a mountain biker sympathizer. QED

    Nope ! I am a persom who likes to poke the trolls under the bridge
    with sharp sticks.

    Once again. You were wrong about your assertion. Why cant you admit
    it?

    Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

    Now, please answer the questions

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  4. On 17 Sep 2007 13:23:20 GMT, Chris <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    On 14 Sep 2007 15:58:47 GMT, Chris <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    < snip van-DUH-mans BS>

    > Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

    I will keep it as simple as I can for you.

    After CONVENIENTLY removing the context, so no one can see just how
    STOOPID you are.

    OK van-DUH-man here is the old thread:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>>Mike,
    >>>>> In the thread "Black bear attacks mountain biker in Washington
    >>>>> State
    >>>>>park" your statement that black bears attack to defend their
    >>>>>young. This assertion was proven wrong by two different people
    >>>>>using two different lines of reasoning.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Simply put: You were wrong!
    >>>>
    >>>> BS. Unless you are a bear, you don't know why they attack.
    >>>>
    >>>>> If you were wrong then, how can I take anything you write
    >>>>> seriously??
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Who is in for a rude awaking?? I think it is all of us.
    >>>
    >>>You can stick your head in the sand all you want. Your assertion
    >>>was proven wrong. Didnt you even read the replies to your stupid
    >>>statement. I will cut and paste it again for you and all to read
    >>>once again:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>From a long list of characteristics, the last one listed
    >>>at <http://www.bear.org/Black/Black_Bear_Facts.html> is
    >>>
    >>> Greatest misconception:
    >>>
    >>> The greatest misconception about black bears is that
    >>> they are likely to attack people in defense of cubs.
    >>> They are highly unlikely to do this.
    >>
    >> So they MIGHT do it. QED Can't you read?
    >
    >And a meteor MIGHT hit you in the forehead, but alas, it probably
    >won't. You love to streatch the truth a bit to fit your odd sense of
    >the world.
    >
    >Remember, I am not a mountain biker, therefore; you can not say "Why
    >Do Mountain Bikers ALWAYS Resort to THREATS AND VIOLENCE?"

    But you are a mountain biker sympathizer. QED

    Nope ! I am a persom who likes to poke the trolls under the bridge
    with sharp sticks.

    Once again. You were wrong about your assertion. Why cant you admit
    it?

    Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

    Thanks. Now you can understand my answer (on the line above).

    Quoted message said:

    Now, please answer the questions


    --
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande


  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Now, please answer the questions

    You are avoiding answering the question.

    Why cant you admit you were wrong??

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.