General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Teens’ unhealthy weight hurts later fertility

Started by Alastair · · Last activity · 2 posts · 144 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
15 September 2007
Last activity
15 September 2007
Original author
Alastair
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
144
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20776223/wid/11915773?GT1=10412

    Teens’ unhealthy weight affects later fertility
    Being underweight or obese results in fewer kids in adulthood, study finds
    Reuters
    Updated: 12:03 p.m. MT Sept 14, 2007
    NEW YORK - Teenagers who are either underweight or obese are likely to have
    fewer children in adulthood, a study has found.

    It’s known that both obesity and abnormally low body weight are related to
    reproductive difficulties, and that obesity raises the risk of a number of
    pregnancy complications. However, it has not been clear whether underweight
    and obese teenagers go on to have fewer children than their normal-weight
    peers.

    For the new study, researchers used data on nearly 1,300 Finnish men and
    women who were part of a larger study that has tracked their health since
    1980. All were between the ages of 3 and 18 at the study’s outset, and had
    their body mass index (BMI) measured in adolescence.

    The researchers report the findings in the medical journal Epidemiology.
    Overall, adults who had been underweight as teenagers had 10 percent to 16
    percent fewer children, compared with those who had a normal BMI in
    adolescence. Men and women who’d been obese as teens had 32 percent to 38
    percent fewer children.

    “We know a lot about (the) correlation between BMI and fertility in
    adulthood,” study co-author Dr. Liisa Keltikangas-Jarvinen, of the
    University of Helsinki, told Reuters Health.

    In this study, she explained, there was a long-term effect of teenage BMI,
    independent of adulthood BMI. This was particularly true of women.

    For women, an abnormally low BMI can disrupt the menstrual cycle, while
    obesity can lead to fertility problems. Obesity can, for example,
    contribute to polycystic ovary syndrome, a cause of infertility.

    A man’s reproductive health can also be affected by weight. Both obesity
    and a low BMI have been linked to poor sperm quality, and obesity can raise
    the risk of erectile dysfunction.

    In this study, underweight and obese teenagers were also less likely than
    their normal-weight peers to live with a partner in adulthood — a
    difference that partially explained why they had fewer children.

    Given the increase in obesity rates around the world, the researchers note,
    the current findings suggest there could be widespread effects on adults’
    reproductive health.

    In particular, Keltikangas-Jarvinen said, the results ”stress” the
    potential long-term effects of obesity at a young age — offering one more
    reason to prevent excessive weight gain in childhood.

  2. (Alastair) said:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20776223/wid/11915773?GT1=10412

    Teens' unhealthy weight affects later fertility
    Being underweight or obese results in fewer kids in adulthood, study finds
    Reuters
    Updated: 12:03 p.m. MT Sept 14, 2007
    NEW YORK - Teenagers who are either underweight or obese are likely to have
    fewer children in adulthood, a study has found.

    It's known that both obesity and abnormally low body weight are related to
    reproductive difficulties, and that obesity raises the risk of a number of
    pregnancy complications. However, it has not been clear whether underweight
    and obese teenagers go on to have fewer children than their normal-weight
    peers.

    For the new study, researchers used data on nearly 1,300 Finnish men and
    women who were part of a larger study that has tracked their health since
    1980. All were between the ages of 3 and 18 at the study's outset, and had
    their body mass index (BMI) measured in adolescence.

    The researchers report the findings in the medical journal Epidemiology.
    Overall, adults who had been underweight as teenagers had 10 percent to 16
    percent fewer children, compared with those who had a normal BMI in
    adolescence. Men and women who'd been obese as teens had 32 percent to 38
    percent fewer children.

    "We know a lot about (the) correlation between BMI and fertility in
    adulthood," study co-author Dr. Liisa Keltikangas-Jarvinen, of the
    University of Helsinki, told Reuters Health.

    In this study, she explained, there was a long-term effect of teenage BMI,
    independent of adulthood BMI. This was particularly true of women.

    For women, an abnormally low BMI can disrupt the menstrual cycle, while
    obesity can lead to fertility problems. Obesity can, for example,
    contribute to polycystic ovary syndrome, a cause of infertility.

    A man's reproductive health can also be affected by weight. Both obesity
    and a low BMI have been linked to poor sperm quality, and obesity can raise
    the risk of erectile dysfunction.

    In this study, underweight and obese teenagers were also less likely than
    their normal-weight peers to live with a partner in adulthood - a
    difference that partially explained why they had fewer children.

    Given the increase in obesity rates around the world, the researchers note,
    the current findings suggest there could be widespread effects on adults'
    reproductive health.

    In particular, Keltikangas-Jarvinen said, the results "stress" the
    potential long-term effects of obesity at a young age - offering one more
    reason to prevent excessive weight gain in childhood.

    Sure, this makes sense. Probably as long as you are within the MEDICAL
    HEALTH range for your height, you will be fine. For me at 5'8" that is
    126-164, a huge range. I maintain a weight of 137. A man my height at
    125 or lower would be almost skeletal looking. I just feel better and
    look better at the lower range of my healthy weight range. At 164, I
    have quite a spare tire and feel more listless, but this range seems
    quite reasonable also from the point of view of looks. Within this
    range, most people either just blend in or look thin, but healthy or
    perhaps just a little plump at the higher end of the range, but not
    fat. Young people have to be more careful, because they are smaller
    to begin with and many more seem to already be thinner than adults, so
    it is easy to slip into the too thin stage...just like a baby with
    diarrhea or vomiting can get into trouble real quickly because they
    are so small to begin with. Still, being overweight is probably much
    more of a problem...much more from what I've seen and read both in
    teens and adults. dkw

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.