It's good. Better than the Lance books I have read since Landis give you more on his training and prep efforts. The Lance books are sort of like God, Landis is like a mortal who scaled the heights by being willing to suffer more than anyone else. Landis seems to be more revealing of himself, has a different attitude about making things public. I think the book is a must read for a racing cyclist since there's a lot of ideas on training to ponder.
I have not got the part about the failed test and defense, but one chapter is called the Wiki Defense. He put everything on the web and got lots of free help poking holes in the evidence against him.
I am going to try to finish quick. It would ruin a good read if they rule against him while I am in the middle of it!
It's good. Better than the Lance books I have read since Landis give you more on his training and prep efforts. The Lance books are sort of like God, Landis is like a mortal who scaled the heights by being willing to suffer more than anyone else. Landis seems to be more revealing of himself, has a different attitude about making things public. I think the book is a must read for a racing cyclist since there's a lot of ideas on training to ponder.
For me the difference is that everything I know about the two leads me to believe that Armstrong is the sort of [censored] I never did get along with - the guy you brace your shoulder for when he walks by. Landis I can hang with. Decent guy, interesting perspective on life and a sense of humor.
