Olympic Swimmer 30-40 years old - possible?

HS said:

A few of us have swam competively in our teens and
20s. Is it physically possible for 30-40 year old swimmers to be competitive and make the Olympic
team? Please state your reasons why or why not?

The great Mark Spitz tried a comeback, but didn't quite make it. Of course you could try for the
team from Equatorial Guineau or some other small nation.

Donal Fagan AIA Donal@DonalO'Fagan.com (Anglicise the name to reply by e-mail)

My best friend, now 34 is swimming her fastest times. Matching her best college times, and close to
her best times ever. I think she is around 1:01 in a 100 free LCM sprint. Holding 1:12-1:15 on 1000
broken intervals. Under 20 min in 1500M free, LCM. And keeps improving. She now trains 4000-7000
yards daily, 6 days a week. (usually 4000, and a 7000 about 3 times a week)

She's been swimming since she was 6

"HS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

A few of us have swam competively in our teens and 20s. Is it physically possible for 30-40 year
old swimmers to be competitive and make the

Olympic

Quoted message said:

team? Please state your reasons why or why not? Thanks.

There were swimmers in that age range at the last Olympics. I think that Popov is now in his 30s.

"Donal Fagan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

HS said:

A few of us have swam competively in our teens and
20s. Is it physically possible for 30-40 year old swimmers to be competitive and make the
Olympic team? Please state your reasons why or why not?

The great Mark Spitz tried a comeback, but didn't quite make it. Of course you could try for the
team from Equatorial Guineau or some other small nation.

Donal Fagan AIA Donal@DonalO'Fagan.com (Anglicise the name to reply by e-mail)

Colin Priest said:

There were swimmers in that age range at the last Olympics. I think that Popov is now in his 30s.

Granted, but I gather this fellow is not already an elite swimmer.

Donal Fagan AIA Donal@DonalO'Fagan.com (Anglicise the name to reply by e-mail)

There was an Aussie about ten years ago who had not swum competitively until he was about 23 and
went on to represent Australia at Commonwealth and Olympic Games into his late twenties. He was a
former elite high jumper. It would appear that someone with an elite athletic prowess could take up
swimming later in life and compete at the top level.

"Donal Fagan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Colin Priest said:

There were swimmers in that age range at the last Olympics. I think that Popov is now in his 30s.

Granted, but I gather this fellow is not already an elite swimmer.

Donal Fagan AIA Donal@DonalO'Fagan.com (Anglicise the name to reply by e-mail)

"Totalswimm" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

The dominant athletes in triathlon - which is more physically demanding

than

Quoted message said:

swimming - and marathon running are commonly in their 30s.

I would argue that this is because of triathlon's status as a sport. its more something you fall
into after going through the traditional route of high school/college athletics, or pick up later in
life as a health kick, which turns into an admirable obsession. However, i acknowledge this is
changing in recent years.

Totalswimm said:

The dominant athletes in triathlon - which is more physically demanding than swimming - and
marathon running are commonly in their 30s. I think the main reason for swimmers not being able to
commonly sustain excellent into their 30s are mainly social and cultural. Many coaches adopt an
authoritarian, rather than collaborative, style, under which most adult athletes would chafe. And
the intensive early training of age group swimmers is radically different from what marathon runner
and triathletes would have been doing in their preteens and early/mid teens.

VO2Max holds pretty constant in the 20s up to the very early 30s, and then begins an inevitable
decline. At the puny distances done in olympic swimming, I don't think superior technique can make
up for this. The longest event is the 1500, right? That's not even 15 minutes long. If open water
swimming came in - I imagine it would be a 1500 and a 5000, maybe a 10k - then you'd see 'older'
olympians.

Marathons are right at the threshhold that one can do on blood sugar alone, and IMs are about the
balance of pushing your LT but not so far that you can't take in food. Both require knowing your
body very well, and I think that requires experience of years of competing. Here, technique can be
worth a lot, and does compensate for any lost max potential.

Chris McCormack is becoming an interesting figure to watch on this. He's an absolute killer at the
olympic distance (non drafting) event, but has blown up in two runs at Hawaii and not gotten the
same result as he did in winning the Australian IM. The performance envelope that they race at for
8.5 hours is a very precarious one.
--
Jason O'Rourke www.jor.com

Totalswimm said:

Athletes routinely peak in performance potential (a marriage of physical ability and the benefit
of wisdom/perspective) in their early 30s. Dara Torres demonstrated in 2000 it could be done.
Popov won world championships last summer at, what, 31.

The dominant athletes in triathlon - which is more physically demanding than swimming - and
marathon running are commonly in their 30s. I think the main reason for swimmers not being able to
commonly sustain excellent into their 30s are mainly social and cultural. Many coaches adopt an
authoritarian, rather than collaborative, style, under which most adult athletes would chafe. And
the intensive early training of age group swimmers is radically different from what marathon
runner and triathletes would have been doing in their preteens and early/mid teens. Terry

Here, in Canada, the only way one (without wealthy parents) can afford to swim at any post national
level is to do so for a school team. Even an A card (the highest level of sports Canada funding)
puts one below the poverty line. Unlike other countries there simply isn't the advertising revenue
or promotional opportunities either. Hence there's a huge push to produce career results in high
school and university - well before the growth and development curve says they should occur.

--Mike

"King Frog" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

There was an Aussie about ten years ago who had not swum competitively until he was about 23 and
went on to represent Australia at Commonwealth and Olympic Games into his late twenties. He was a
former elite high jumper. It would appear that someone with an elite athletic prowess could take
up swimming later in life and compete at the top level.

The swimmer concerned was Angus Waddell, a sprint freestyler.

"diablo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"Totalswimm" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

The dominant athletes in triathlon - which is more physically demanding

than

Quoted message said:

swimming - and marathon running are commonly in their 30s.

I would argue that this is because of triathlon's status as a sport. its more something you fall
into after going through the traditional route of high school/college athletics, or pick up later
in life as a health kick, which turns into an admirable obsession. However, i acknowledge this is
changing in recent years.

Agreeing with you here. The difference in entry numbers between the 30-34AG and the 20-24AG and the
25-29AG is pretty amazing. Sometimes more than twice as many 30-34 year olds racing as "the kids"
combined. Typical route seems to be to pick it up as a second sport when you're already doing one of
the three disciplines on a regular basis, are looking for something different and challenging, but
still want the comfort of knowing that you're competent in one of the three disciplines.