General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Problem with Cox News Server

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 91 posts · 933 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
9 November 2007
Last activity
11 November 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
91
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
933
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–80 of 91
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Terry Pulliam Burd said:

    I feel your pain - I have cox-suckuhs, too (news.west.cox.net). I
    generally don't have any problems getting ngs, but every single time I
    try to download new headers, I get a prompt from Agent that warns me
    that the maximum no. of connections have been reached. BUT if I just
    close the prompt, it downloads anyway. It's as if Agent is reading an
    error message that isn't there or misinterpreting one.

    I don't use Agent and I use a Mac. Setting the number of connections is
    on a pulldown menu for me. If I get that message, that means I have
    clicked on too many newsgroups or threads. Upping the number of
    connections solves the problem. I would suggest checking HELP for Agent.

    Quoted message said:

    OTOH, I cannot read ngs on the road from my laptop.

    Newsgroup access costs money. Many ISPs don't allow access unless you
    are going directly through them.

  2. Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 09:28:50p, Terry Pulliam Burd meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:53:38 -0800, [email hidden] rummaged
    around random neurons and opined:

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, they have 4 servers: news.west.cox.net, newsbeta.west.cox.net,
    news.east.cox.net, and newsbeta.east.cox.net, and I've tried them all.
    Same response on all of them. :-( Thanks for the suggestion, though.

    I feel your pain - I have cox-suckuhs, too (news.west.cox.net). I
    generally don't have any problems getting ngs, but every single time I
    try to download new headers, I get a prompt from Agent that warns me
    that the maximum no. of connections have been reached. BUT if I just
    close the prompt, it downloads anyway. It's as if Agent is reading an
    error message that isn't there or misinterpreting one.

    OTOH, I cannot read ngs on the road from my laptop. I have Agent and
    it's programmed just the way I've always done it from the road, but
    the last year or so, Cox hasn't supported third party ISPs, such as
    WiFi. I've signed up for Agent's NNTP server, but still can't get it
    to work. Agent's support has been great, however. My next step is to
    send them a screen shot of my Agent setup. God, I hate Cox. The last
    time I worked with their customer support, I had to explain to the
    maroon what newsgroups are.

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    --
    "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
    old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
    waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

    -- Duncan Hines

    To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"

    I have a similar problem at work, Terry. I cannot connect to
    news.west.cox.net through our network, yet our network explicitly allows
    for that designation. Pooh!

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    'Sorry... it's the chocolate talking.' -- Wakko Warner

  3. Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 09:28:50p, Terry Pulliam Burd meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:53:38 -0800, [email hidden] rummaged
    around random neurons and opined:

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, they have 4 servers: news.west.cox.net, newsbeta.west.cox.net,
    news.east.cox.net, and newsbeta.east.cox.net, and I've tried them all.
    Same response on all of them. :-( Thanks for the suggestion, though.

    I feel your pain - I have cox-suckuhs, too (news.west.cox.net). I
    generally don't have any problems getting ngs, but every single time I
    try to download new headers, I get a prompt from Agent that warns me
    that the maximum no. of connections have been reached. BUT if I just
    close the prompt, it downloads anyway. It's as if Agent is reading an
    error message that isn't there or misinterpreting one.

    OTOH, I cannot read ngs on the road from my laptop. I have Agent and
    it's programmed just the way I've always done it from the road, but
    the last year or so, Cox hasn't supported third party ISPs, such as
    WiFi. I've signed up for Agent's NNTP server, but still can't get it
    to work. Agent's support has been great, however. My next step is to
    send them a screen shot of my Agent setup. God, I hate Cox. The last
    time I worked with their customer support, I had to explain to the
    maroon what newsgroups are.

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    --
    "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
    old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
    waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

    -- Duncan Hines

    To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"

    I have a similar problem at work, Terry. I cannot connect to
    news.west.cox.net through our network, yet our network explicitly allows
    for that designation. Pooh!

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    'Sorry... it's the chocolate talking.' -- Wakko Warner

  4. Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 10:45:59p, Dan Abel meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Terry Pulliam Burd said:

    I feel your pain - I have cox-suckuhs, too (news.west.cox.net). I
    generally don't have any problems getting ngs, but every single time I
    try to download new headers, I get a prompt from Agent that warns me
    that the maximum no. of connections have been reached. BUT if I just
    close the prompt, it downloads anyway. It's as if Agent is reading an
    error message that isn't there or misinterpreting one.

    I don't use Agent and I use a Mac. Setting the number of connections is
    on a pulldown menu for me. If I get that message, that means I have
    clicked on too many newsgroups or threads. Upping the number of
    connections solves the problem. I would suggest checking HELP for Agent.

    As far as I know, there is no such setting in Xnews; however, the problem I
    had last night and this morning was clearly a problem with their server.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    OTOH, I cannot read ngs on the road from my laptop.

    Newsgroup access costs money. Many ISPs don't allow access unless you
    are going directly through them.

    That must be why I cannot access them through the network at my office.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    'Sorry... it's the chocolate talking.' -- Wakko Warner

  5. Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 10:45:59p, Dan Abel meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Terry Pulliam Burd said:

    I feel your pain - I have cox-suckuhs, too (news.west.cox.net). I
    generally don't have any problems getting ngs, but every single time I
    try to download new headers, I get a prompt from Agent that warns me
    that the maximum no. of connections have been reached. BUT if I just
    close the prompt, it downloads anyway. It's as if Agent is reading an
    error message that isn't there or misinterpreting one.

    I don't use Agent and I use a Mac. Setting the number of connections is
    on a pulldown menu for me. If I get that message, that means I have
    clicked on too many newsgroups or threads. Upping the number of
    connections solves the problem. I would suggest checking HELP for Agent.

    As far as I know, there is no such setting in Xnews; however, the problem I
    had last night and this morning was clearly a problem with their server.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    OTOH, I cannot read ngs on the road from my laptop.

    Newsgroup access costs money. Many ISPs don't allow access unless you
    are going directly through them.

    That must be why I cannot access them through the network at my office.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    'Sorry... it's the chocolate talking.' -- Wakko Warner

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is working
    fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is working
    fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

  8. Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 11:55:04p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is
    working fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone, and
    high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any problem to
    date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    'Sorry... it's the chocolate talking.' -- Wakko Warner

  9. Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 11:55:04p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is
    working fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone, and
    high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any problem to
    date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    'Sorry... it's the chocolate talking.' -- Wakko Warner

  10. T said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is working
    fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I had an ISP like that. DNS would go out for 30 to 60 minutes
    sometimes. The solution is to put the IP's of you're most-used
    sites/servers in the hosts file. Your Usenet server, for
    example. So at least you have something to do in the meantime.

    -sw

  11. T said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is working
    fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I had an ISP like that. DNS would go out for 30 to 60 minutes
    sometimes. The solution is to put the IP's of you're most-used
    sites/servers in the hosts file. Your Usenet server, for
    example. So at least you have something to do in the meantime.

    -sw

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 11:55:04p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is
    working fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone, and
    high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any problem to
    date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    It all depends on where you live. For example, the cable system here
    started out as Dimension Cable and then Cox bought the whole kit and
    kaboodle. Spent a lot of money upgrading and things of that nature.

    Watched the @home thing go belly up then they had to scramble to roll
    out their own service which was fraught with problems.

    The latest is the speed upgrade they did in Rhode Island. They had to
    replace all the amplifiers and they contracted with a company that
    didn't do the job to specidification.

    For example, amplifiers have automatic temperature control since RF
    devices like nice, warm and stable temperatures. There are also things
    called l-pads that control signal gain. If the signal is too high/hot
    most cable modems complain loudly.

    It turns out the contractor didn't install either option.

    Curiously enough we used Cox for two VAN (Virtual Arean Network)
    circuits. One of the circuits gave us nothing but problems. It turns out
    the amplifiers in the street had been upgraded but the l-pads and temp
    control weren't turned on.

    When we moved about a half mile away the service was great until the
    first temperature drop below 50F. All of a sudden nothing worked.

    I called Cox and explained to the drone that I knew exactly what the
    problem was, and could they please get the tier-2 guys out to fix it.

    A couple hours later I notice one of the Cox bucket trucks down the
    street. I went down and it's one of the guys I know. He ws griping about
    having to spend all his time fixing the contractor screw-ups.

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 11:55:04p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is
    working fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone, and
    high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any problem to
    date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    It all depends on where you live. For example, the cable system here
    started out as Dimension Cable and then Cox bought the whole kit and
    kaboodle. Spent a lot of money upgrading and things of that nature.

    Watched the @home thing go belly up then they had to scramble to roll
    out their own service which was fraught with problems.

    The latest is the speed upgrade they did in Rhode Island. They had to
    replace all the amplifiers and they contracted with a company that
    didn't do the job to specidification.

    For example, amplifiers have automatic temperature control since RF
    devices like nice, warm and stable temperatures. There are also things
    called l-pads that control signal gain. If the signal is too high/hot
    most cable modems complain loudly.

    It turns out the contractor didn't install either option.

    Curiously enough we used Cox for two VAN (Virtual Arean Network)
    circuits. One of the circuits gave us nothing but problems. It turns out
    the amplifiers in the street had been upgraded but the l-pads and temp
    control weren't turned on.

    When we moved about a half mile away the service was great until the
    first temperature drop below 50F. All of a sudden nothing worked.

    I called Cox and explained to the drone that I knew exactly what the
    problem was, and could they please get the tier-2 guys out to fix it.

    A couple hours later I notice one of the Cox bucket trucks down the
    street. I went down and it's one of the guys I know. He ws griping about
    having to spend all his time fixing the contractor screw-ups.

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
    says...

    Quoted message said:
    T said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is working
    fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I had an ISP like that. DNS would go out for 30 to 60 minutes
    sometimes. The solution is to put the IP's of you're most-used
    sites/servers in the hosts file. Your Usenet server, for
    example. So at least you have something to do in the meantime.

    -sw

    I know about the hosts thing but quite honestly I'd rather just setup my
    own DNS zone on a server and then use Cox for the hierarchical lookups.

  15. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
    says...

    Quoted message said:
    T said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had resolved
    whatever was causing their problem. At the moment, eventhing is working
    fine.

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I had an ISP like that. DNS would go out for 30 to 60 minutes
    sometimes. The solution is to put the IP's of you're most-used
    sites/servers in the hosts file. Your Usenet server, for
    example. So at least you have something to do in the meantime.

    -sw

    I know about the hosts thing but quite honestly I'd rather just setup my
    own DNS zone on a server and then use Cox for the hierarchical lookups.

  16. Oh pshaw, on Sat 10 Nov 2007 01:47:46p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 11:55:04p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...
    > I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had
    > resolved whatever was causing their problem. At the moment,
    > eventhing is working fine.
    >
    >

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone,
    and high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any
    problem to date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    It all depends on where you live. For example, the cable system here
    started out as Dimension Cable and then Cox bought the whole kit and
    kaboodle. Spent a lot of money upgrading and things of that nature.

    Watched the @home thing go belly up then they had to scramble to roll
    out their own service which was fraught with problems.

    The latest is the speed upgrade they did in Rhode Island. They had to
    replace all the amplifiers and they contracted with a company that
    didn't do the job to specidification.

    For example, amplifiers have automatic temperature control since RF
    devices like nice, warm and stable temperatures. There are also things
    called l-pads that control signal gain. If the signal is too high/hot
    most cable modems complain loudly.

    It turns out the contractor didn't install either option.

    Curiously enough we used Cox for two VAN (Virtual Arean Network)
    circuits. One of the circuits gave us nothing but problems. It turns out
    the amplifiers in the street had been upgraded but the l-pads and temp
    control weren't turned on.

    When we moved about a half mile away the service was great until the
    first temperature drop below 50F. All of a sudden nothing worked.

    I called Cox and explained to the drone that I knew exactly what the
    problem was, and could they please get the tier-2 guys out to fix it.

    A couple hours later I notice one of the Cox bucket trucks down the
    street. I went down and it's one of the guys I know. He ws griping about
    having to spend all his time fixing the contractor screw-ups.

    Interesting course of events!

    In our case we had only two choices in the neighborhood we moved to. It
    was either Qwest with DSL for Internet, or Cox. This appears to be true
    for most areas of Phoenix and the burbs, although there are some other DSL
    choices. In our old neighborhood, DSL through Qwest was our only option.
    The speed (due primarily to distance from the CO, which would have been
    true at the new location as well) was really lousy, as was their service
    and unpredictability and outages. In general, people we knew who had Cox
    had always been pretty satisfied. I've never had reason to become too
    technically involved with any of these folks, although I do work in the
    network area of an IT department and do have some knowledge and skills that
    might be applicable.

    Generally their equipment seems to be up to snuff and we've generally been
    very pleased. We've had only one outage since December and it resolved in
    less than two hours. It was caused by a traffic accident.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    OK, I'm weird ! But I'm saving up to be eccentric.

  17. Oh pshaw, on Sat 10 Nov 2007 01:47:46p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh pshaw, on Fri 09 Nov 2007 11:55:04p, T meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...
    > I was gone from home most of today, during which time Cox had
    > resolved whatever was causing their problem. At the moment,
    > eventhing is working fine.
    >
    >

    Cox is like that. Another famouse feature of Cox is frequent DNS
    dropouts. The net doesn't work without DNS, or at least work well.

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone,
    and high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any
    problem to date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    It all depends on where you live. For example, the cable system here
    started out as Dimension Cable and then Cox bought the whole kit and
    kaboodle. Spent a lot of money upgrading and things of that nature.

    Watched the @home thing go belly up then they had to scramble to roll
    out their own service which was fraught with problems.

    The latest is the speed upgrade they did in Rhode Island. They had to
    replace all the amplifiers and they contracted with a company that
    didn't do the job to specidification.

    For example, amplifiers have automatic temperature control since RF
    devices like nice, warm and stable temperatures. There are also things
    called l-pads that control signal gain. If the signal is too high/hot
    most cable modems complain loudly.

    It turns out the contractor didn't install either option.

    Curiously enough we used Cox for two VAN (Virtual Arean Network)
    circuits. One of the circuits gave us nothing but problems. It turns out
    the amplifiers in the street had been upgraded but the l-pads and temp
    control weren't turned on.

    When we moved about a half mile away the service was great until the
    first temperature drop below 50F. All of a sudden nothing worked.

    I called Cox and explained to the drone that I knew exactly what the
    problem was, and could they please get the tier-2 guys out to fix it.

    A couple hours later I notice one of the Cox bucket trucks down the
    street. I went down and it's one of the guys I know. He ws griping about
    having to spend all his time fixing the contractor screw-ups.

    Interesting course of events!

    In our case we had only two choices in the neighborhood we moved to. It
    was either Qwest with DSL for Internet, or Cox. This appears to be true
    for most areas of Phoenix and the burbs, although there are some other DSL
    choices. In our old neighborhood, DSL through Qwest was our only option.
    The speed (due primarily to distance from the CO, which would have been
    true at the new location as well) was really lousy, as was their service
    and unpredictability and outages. In general, people we knew who had Cox
    had always been pretty satisfied. I've never had reason to become too
    technically involved with any of these folks, although I do work in the
    network area of an IT department and do have some knowledge and skills that
    might be applicable.

    Generally their equipment seems to be up to snuff and we've generally been
    very pleased. We've had only one outage since December and it resolved in
    less than two hours. It was caused by a traffic accident.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    OK, I'm weird ! But I'm saving up to be eccentric.

  18. On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:02:22 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
    <[email hidden]> fired up random neurons and synapses to
    opine:

    Quoted message said:

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone, and
    high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any problem to
    date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    Well, hang onto your hair, b/c if there's one thing you can count on
    with Cox, it's that you can't count on them. We have gone through 5 or
    6 DVR/receivers, which always results in losing all our DVR'd
    programs, of course. On the 4th or 5th one, the tech I was talking to
    on the phone said, "Atlanta is aware of the problem" with the DVRs (I
    inferred from that that the corporate headquarters are in Atlanta),
    like Atlanta's *awareness* was going to make me a happy customer. We
    finally got a "supervisor level" repairman to come out who said the
    machines were cr*p.

    My experience with the high speed cable isn't anything to write home
    about, either. When the DSL is out, I just *love* going through their
    telephone menu hell and run into a robotic voice telling me that I'll
    get faster service if I visit their website at...I feel like throwing
    the phone through the wall. If I could get connected to the Internet,
    I wouldn't be bloody calling!

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    --
    "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
    old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
    waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

    -- Duncan Hines

    To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"

  19. On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:02:22 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
    <[email hidden]> fired up random neurons and synapses to
    opine:

    Quoted message said:

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone, and
    high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any problem to
    date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    Well, hang onto your hair, b/c if there's one thing you can count on
    with Cox, it's that you can't count on them. We have gone through 5 or
    6 DVR/receivers, which always results in losing all our DVR'd
    programs, of course. On the 4th or 5th one, the tech I was talking to
    on the phone said, "Atlanta is aware of the problem" with the DVRs (I
    inferred from that that the corporate headquarters are in Atlanta),
    like Atlanta's *awareness* was going to make me a happy customer. We
    finally got a "supervisor level" repairman to come out who said the
    machines were cr*p.

    My experience with the high speed cable isn't anything to write home
    about, either. When the DSL is out, I just *love* going through their
    telephone menu hell and run into a robotic voice telling me that I'll
    get faster service if I visit their website at...I feel like throwing
    the phone through the wall. If I could get connected to the Internet,
    I wouldn't be bloody calling!

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    --
    "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
    old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
    waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

    -- Duncan Hines

    To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"

  20. Oh pshaw, on Sat 10 Nov 2007 08:15:47p, Terry Pulliam Burd meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:02:22 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
    <[email hidden]> fired up random neurons and synapses to
    opine:

    Quoted message said:

    I guess I've lived a charmed life until now. When we moved to our new
    house this past December we began services with Cox for cable, phone, and
    high speed Internet. This is the very first occurrence of any problem to
    date. I guess I can expect more problems in the future. :-(

    Well, hang onto your hair, b/c if there's one thing you can count on
    with Cox, it's that you can't count on them. We have gone through 5 or
    6 DVR/receivers, which always results in losing all our DVR'd
    programs, of course. On the 4th or 5th one, the tech I was talking to
    on the phone said, "Atlanta is aware of the problem" with the DVRs (I
    inferred from that that the corporate headquarters are in Atlanta),
    like Atlanta's *awareness* was going to make me a happy customer. We
    finally got a "supervisor level" repairman to come out who said the
    machines were cr*p.

    My experience with the high speed cable isn't anything to write home
    about, either. When the DSL is out, I just *love* going through their
    telephone menu hell and run into a robotic voice telling me that I'll
    get faster service if I visit their website at...I feel like throwing
    the phone through the wall. If I could get connected to the Internet,
    I wouldn't be bloody calling!

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    --
    "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
    old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
    waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

    -- Duncan Hines

    To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"

    Well, for one thing, we don't have one of Cox's DVRs, but one that we
    bought. No problem there.

    Our Internet is digital cable, not DSL. Are you sure yours is DSL through
    Cox?

    I do have to agree that the few contacts I've had with their support staff
    have been less than dazzling. :-)

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
    ______________________________________________________________

    OK, I'm weird ! But I'm saving up to be eccentric.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.