General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT - Personal Whine

Started by Little Malice · · Last activity · 81 posts · 2,420 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 November 2007
Last activity
5 December 2007
Original author
Little Malice
Posts
81
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,420
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–80 of 81
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Oh pshaw, on Mon 03 Dec 2007 01:35:42p, zxcvbob meant to say...

    Quoted message said:
    Dan Abel said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Giusi said:

    "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> ha scritto nel messaggio

    Quoted message said:

    > Very few people can say that. I too, enjoy my job, the people, and
    > what I do. I have no plans to retire as long as I can get there.
    > Work is something laborious; if you like what you do it is not work.
    That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work. I
    think I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do. There may
    be parts I would prefer someone else do, but that's true of every part
    of life.

    I've changed diapers. A whole lot. For many years. That doesn't
    define my life. Having children means changing diapers. That isn't
    why you have them. Same thing with work. There are things that need
    to get done. You do them. That isn't why you do the job.

    Of course, if you actually *like* changing diapers, the world is your
    oyster.

    As a nanny, perhaps.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright

    Date: Monday, December 3rd,2007

    *******************************************
    Countdown 'til Christmas
    3wks 9hrs
    *******************************************
    All the world's a stage and the people
    on it are poorly rehearsed
    *******************************************

  2. "Giusi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work. I think
    I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do. There may be parts I
    would prefer someone else do, but that's true of every part of life.

    I wish it was silly. May people take jobs because they have to earn money
    to survive, but they hate the job they have. They hate the work, they hate
    the boss, etc. All they want is the pay check.

  3. "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Giusi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work. I think
    I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do. There may be parts I
    would prefer someone else do, but that's true of every part of life.

    I wish it was silly. May people take jobs because they have to earn money
    to survive, but they hate the job they have. They hate the work, they
    hate the boss, etc. All they want is the pay check.

    You bet. I worked for so many years in service industries, mainly bartending
    and waiting tables. Ugh. It was all I could do the last two years to make
    sure my loathing did not show.

  4. Wayne Boatwright said:

    Oh pshaw, on Mon 03 Dec 2007 01:35:42p, zxcvbob meant to say...

    Quoted message said:
    Dan Abel said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "Giusi" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> ha scritto nel messaggio
    >> Very few people can say that. I too, enjoy my job, the people, and
    >> what I do. I have no plans to retire as long as I can get there.
    >> Work is something laborious; if you like what you do it is not work.
    > That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work. I
    > think I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do. There may
    > be parts I would prefer someone else do, but that's true of every part
    > of life.
    I've changed diapers. A whole lot. For many years. That doesn't
    define my life. Having children means changing diapers. That isn't
    why you have them. Same thing with work. There are things that need
    to get done. You do them. That isn't why you do the job.

    Of course, if you actually *like* changing diapers, the world is your
    oyster.

    As a nanny, perhaps.

    I just wanted an excuse to mention diapers and oysters in the same sentence.

  5. On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:35:42 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Dan Abel said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Giusi said:

    "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> ha scritto nel messaggio

    Quoted message said:

    > Very few people can say that. I too, enjoy my job, the people, and what I
    > do. I have no plans to retire as long as I can get there. Work is
    > something laborious; if you like what you do it is not work.
    That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work. I think
    I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do. There may be parts I
    would prefer someone else do, but that's true of every part of life.

    I've changed diapers. A whole lot. For many years. That doesn't
    define my life. Having children means changing diapers. That isn't why
    you have them. Same thing with work. There are things that need to get
    done. You do them. That isn't why you do the job.

    Of course, if you actually *like* changing diapers, the world is your
    oyster.

    who was the gal here who said washing dishes gave her an orgasm?

    your pal,
    blake

  6. On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:45:25 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    Oh pshaw, on Mon 03 Dec 2007 01:35:42p, zxcvbob meant to say...

    Quoted message said:

    Dan Abel wrote:
    > In article <[email hidden]>,
    > "Giusi" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >> "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> ha scritto nel messaggio
    >>> Very few people can say that. I too, enjoy my job, the people, and
    >>> what I do. I have no plans to retire as long as I can get there.
    >>> Work is something laborious; if you like what you do it is not work.
    >> That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work. I
    >> think I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do. There may
    >> be parts I would prefer someone else do, but that's true of every part
    >> of life.
    > I've changed diapers. A whole lot. For many years. That doesn't
    > define my life. Having children means changing diapers. That isn't
    > why you have them. Same thing with work. There are things that need
    > to get done. You do them. That isn't why you do the job.
    >

    Of course, if you actually *like* changing diapers, the world is your
    oyster.

    As a nanny, perhaps.

    I just wanted an excuse to mention diapers and oysters in the same sentence.

    oyster diapers are really hard to get.

    your pal,
    blake

  7. blake murphy said:

    On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:45:25 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    Oh pshaw, on Mon 03 Dec 2007 01:35:42p, zxcvbob meant to say...

    > Dan Abel wrote:
    >> In article <[email hidden]>,
    >> "Giusi" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> ha scritto nel messaggio
    >>>> Very few people can say that. I too, enjoy my job, the people,
    >>>> and what I do. I have no plans to retire as long as I can get
    >>>> there. Work is something laborious; if you like what you do it
    >>>> is not work.
    >>> That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work.
    >>> I think I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do.
    >>> There may be parts I would prefer someone else do, but that's
    >>> true of every part of life.
    >> I've changed diapers. A whole lot. For many years. That doesn't
    >> define my life. Having children means changing diapers. That
    >> isn't why you have them. Same thing with work. There are things
    >> that need to get done. You do them. That isn't why you do the
    >> job.
    >>
    >
    > Of course, if you actually *like* changing diapers, the world is
    > your oyster.
    >

    As a nanny, perhaps.

    I just wanted an excuse to mention diapers and oysters in the same
    sentence.

    oyster diapers are really hard to get.

    your pal,
    blake

    Dang - learn something new every day. I didn't even know oysters wore
    diapers.

  8. The message <[email hidden]>
    from blake murphy <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:45:25 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I just wanted an excuse to mention diapers and oysters in the same
    sentence.

    Quoted message said:

    oyster diapers are really hard to get.

    That's why baby oysters never wear them.

    Janet.

  9. "Mary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:46:19 -0600, jmcquown wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's too bad unemployment insurance only lasts about 6 weeks.

    If you only worked for 5 months, sure. But if you worked for 18
    months or more, you should get 26 weeks of unemployment. That's
    6 *months*, not 6 *weeks.

    So what happens if someone is still unemployed at the end of the 6 months?
    What happens to them then?

  10. blake murphy said:

    who was the gal here who said washing dishes gave her an orgasm?

    your pal,
    blake

    Damn.. I must be using the wrong detergent or something..?

  11. FarmI said:

    "Mary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:46:19 -0600, jmcquown wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's too bad unemployment insurance only lasts about 6 weeks.


    If you only worked for 5 months, sure. But if you worked for 18
    months or more, you should get 26 weeks of unemployment. That's
    6 *months*, not 6 *weeks.

    So what happens if someone is still unemployed at the end of the 6 months?
    What happens to them then?


    lol, apparently they post to USENET.

  12. On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:20:32 +1100, "FarmI" <ask@itshall be given>

    Quoted message said:

    "Mary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:46:19 -0600, jmcquown wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's too bad unemployment insurance only lasts about 6 weeks.

    If you only worked for 5 months, sure. But if you worked for 18
    months or more, you should get 26 weeks of unemployment. That's
    6 *months*, not 6 *weeks.

    So what happens if someone is still unemployed at the end of the 6 months?
    What happens to them then?


    If they're lucky, it's extended... but in most cases they simply cease
    to be a statistic.

    --
    See return address to reply by email
    remove the smiley face first

  13. limey said:
    blake murphy said:

    On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:45:25 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Wayne Boatwright wrote:
    > Oh pshaw, on Mon 03 Dec 2007 01:35:42p, zxcvbob meant to say...
    >
    >> Dan Abel wrote:
    >>> In article <[email hidden]>,
    >>> "Giusi" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> ha scritto nel messaggio
    >>>>> Very few people can say that. I too, enjoy my job, the people,
    >>>>> and what I do. I have no plans to retire as long as I can get
    >>>>> there. Work is something laborious; if you like what you do it
    >>>>> is not work.
    >>>> That sounds very silly to me. I always do what I like for work.
    >>>> I think I'd be poor at doing something I didn't like to do.
    >>>> There may be parts I would prefer someone else do, but that's
    >>>> true of every part of life.
    >>> I've changed diapers. A whole lot. For many years. That doesn't
    >>> define my life. Having children means changing diapers. That
    >>> isn't why you have them. Same thing with work. There are things
    >>> that need to get done. You do them. That isn't why you do the
    >>> job.
    >>>
    >>
    >> Of course, if you actually *like* changing diapers, the world is
    >> your oyster.
    >>
    >
    > As a nanny, perhaps.
    >

    I just wanted an excuse to mention diapers and oysters in the same
    sentence.

    oyster diapers are really hard to get.

    your pal,
    blake

    Dang - learn something new every day. I didn't even know oysters wore
    diapers.

    some you can train to use a litterbox.

    your pal,
    blake

  14. Janet Baraclough said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from blake murphy <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:45:25 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I just wanted an excuse to mention diapers and oysters in the same
    sentence.

    Quoted message said:

    oyster diapers are really hard to get.

    That's why baby oysters never wear them.

    Janet.

    those are just the vain ones. they're *so* status-conscious.

    your pal,
    blake

  15. On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:47:38 -0500, Goomba38 <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    blake murphy said:

    who was the gal here who said washing dishes gave her an orgasm?

    your pal,
    blake

    Damn.. I must be using the wrong detergent or something..?

    maybe there was an appliance involved that wasn't a dishwasher.

    your pal,
    blake

  16. "blake murphy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:47:38 -0500, Goomba38 <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    blake murphy said:

    who was the gal here who said washing dishes gave her an orgasm?

    your pal,
    blake

    Damn.. I must be using the wrong detergent or something..?

    maybe there was an appliance involved that wasn't a dishwasher.

    Washer. Spin cycle. I saw it on a sitcom.

  17. "cybercat" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "blake murphy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:47:38 -0500, Goomba38 <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    blake murphy wrote:

    > who was the gal here who said washing dishes gave her an orgasm?
    >
    > your pal,
    > blake

    Damn.. I must be using the wrong detergent or something..?

    maybe there was an appliance involved that wasn't a dishwasher.

    Washer. Spin cycle. I saw it on a sitcom.

    "Mad Men"? I've had washers that vibrated but not to <that> extent.

    Felice

  18. blake murphy said:
    Janet Baraclough said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from blake murphy <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:45:25 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>
    wrote:
    > I just wanted an excuse to mention diapers and oysters in the same
    > sentence.

    Quoted message said:

    oyster diapers are really hard to get.

    That's why baby oysters never wear them.

    Janet.

    those are just the vain ones. they're *so* status-conscious.

    your pal,
    blake

    No diapers? They must be Britney oysters - er., I mean Brittany
    oysters?

  19. "Felice" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Washer. Spin cycle. I saw it on a sitcom.

    "Mad Men"?

    I don't know that one! I can't recall which show it was, but it
    shocked me!

    Quoted message said:

    I've had washers that vibrated but not to <that> extent.

    I am still trying to figure out the logistics involved. 🙂

    Not very hard, mind you.

  20. cybercat said:

    "Felice" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Washer. Spin cycle. I saw it on a sitcom.

    "Mad Men"?

    I don't know that one! I can't recall which show it was, but it
    shocked me!

    Quoted message said:

    I've had washers that vibrated but not to <that> extent.

    I am still trying to figure out the logistics involved. 🙂

    Not very hard, mind you.

    *point* 🙂

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.