General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT: Kangaroo farts can save the world!!

Started by PeterLucas · · Last activity · 2 posts · 405 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 December 2007
Last activity
6 December 2007
Original author
PeterLucas
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
405
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22879806-29277,00.html

    Kangaroo farts could ease global warming

    December 06, 2007 11:56am
    Article from: Agence France-Presse

    AUSTRALIAN scientists are trying to give kangaroo-style stomachs to
    cattle and sheep in a bid to cut the emission of greenhouse gases blamed
    for global warming, researchers say.

    Thanks to special bacteria in their stomachs, kangaroo flatulence
    contains no methane and scientists want to transfer that bacteria to
    cattle and sheep who emit large quantities of the harmful gas.

    While the usual image of greenhouse gas pollution is a billowing
    smokestack pushing out carbon dioxide, livestock passing wind contribute
    a surprisingly high percentage of total emissions in some countries.

    "Fourteen per cent of emissions from all sources in Australia is from
    enteric methane from cattle and sheep,'' said Athol Klieve, a senior
    research scientist with the Queensland Government.

    "And if you look at another country such as New Zealand, which has got a
    much higher agricultural base, they're actually up around 50 per
    cent,'' he said.

    Researchers say the bacteria also makes the digestive process much more
    efficient and could potentially save millions of dollars in feed costs
    for farmers.

    "Not only would they not produce the methane, they would actually get
    something like 10 to 15 per cent more energy out of the feed they are
    eating,'' said Mr Klieve.

    Even farmers who laugh at the idea of environmentally friendly kangaroo
    farts say that's nothing to joke about, particularly given the
    devastating drought Australia is suffering.

    "In a tight year like a drought situation, 15 per cent would be a
    considerable sum,'' said farmer Michael Mitton.

    But it will take researchers at least three years to isolate the
    bacteria, before they can even start to develop a way of transferring it
    to cattle and sheep.

    Another group of scientists, meanwhile, has suggested Australians should
    farm fewer cattle and sheep and just eat more kangaroos.

    The idea is controversial, but about 20 per cent of health-conscious
    Australians are believed to eat the national symbol already.

    "It's low in fat, it's got high protein levels it's very clean in the
    sense that basically it's the ultimate free range animal,'' said Peter
    Ampt of the University of New South Wales's institute of environmental
    studies.

    "It doesn't get drenched, it doesn't get vaccinated, it utilises food
    right across the landscape, it moves around to where the food is good,
    so yes, it's a good food.''

    It might take a while for kangaroos to become popular barbecue fare, but
    with concern over global warming growing in the world's driest inhabited
    continent, Australians could soon be ready to try almost anything to cut
    emissions.

  2. In article said:

    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22879806-29277,00.html

    Kangaroo farts could ease global warming

    December 06, 2007 11:56am
    Article from: Agence France-Presse

    AUSTRALIAN scientists are trying to give kangaroo-style stomachs to
    cattle and sheep in a bid to cut the emission of greenhouse gases blamed
    for global warming, researchers say.

    Thanks to special bacteria in their stomachs, kangaroo flatulence
    contains no methane and scientists want to transfer that bacteria to
    cattle and sheep who emit large quantities of the harmful gas.

    While the usual image of greenhouse gas pollution is a billowing
    smokestack pushing out carbon dioxide, livestock passing wind contribute
    a surprisingly high percentage of total emissions in some countries.

    "Fourteen per cent of emissions from all sources in Australia is from
    enteric methane from cattle and sheep,'' said Athol Klieve, a senior
    research scientist with the Queensland Government.

    "And if you look at another country such as New Zealand, which has got a
    much higher agricultural base, they're actually up around 50 per
    cent,'' he said.

    Researchers say the bacteria also makes the digestive process much more
    efficient and could potentially save millions of dollars in feed costs
    for farmers.

    "Not only would they not produce the methane, they would actually get
    something like 10 to 15 per cent more energy out of the feed they are
    eating,'' said Mr Klieve.

    Even farmers who laugh at the idea of environmentally friendly kangaroo
    farts say that's nothing to joke about, particularly given the
    devastating drought Australia is suffering.

    "In a tight year like a drought situation, 15 per cent would be a
    considerable sum,'' said farmer Michael Mitton.

    But it will take researchers at least three years to isolate the
    bacteria, before they can even start to develop a way of transferring it
    to cattle and sheep.

    Another group of scientists, meanwhile, has suggested Australians should
    farm fewer cattle and sheep and just eat more kangaroos.

    The idea is controversial, but about 20 per cent of health-conscious
    Australians are believed to eat the national symbol already.

    "It's low in fat, it's got high protein levels it's very clean in the
    sense that basically it's the ultimate free range animal,'' said Peter
    Ampt of the University of New South Wales's institute of environmental
    studies.

    Low fat, no taste... But, more seriously, have they factored in the
    environmental costs of 4x4s charging around he landscape and the
    manufacture of guns and bullets to "harvest" the things?

    I suppose given a couple of decades of breeding it may be possible to
    domesticate them so they can be handled efficiently, but then they
    wouldn't be "the ultimate free range animal" would they?

    Quoted message said:

    "It doesn't get drenched, it doesn't get vaccinated, it utilises food
    right across the landscape, it moves around to where the food is good,
    so yes, it's a good food.''

    It might take a while for kangaroos to become popular barbecue fare, but
    with concern over global warming growing in the world's driest inhabited
    continent, Australians could soon be ready to try almost anything to cut
    emissions.

    Cheers, Phred.

    --
    [email hidden]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·1 bot ·1 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

Applebot (1)