UK and Europe · Public discussion

Anyone use Bicygnals? saw these in Selfridges.

Started by spindrift · · Last activity · 16 posts · 939 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
3 January 2008
Last activity
3 January 2008
Original author
spindrift
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
939
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/groupID/25/categoryID/171/v/620d8f4b-ce63-433f-9fff-b572c7281194

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    You'd be a lot more visible but so few cyclists use them it would just
    confuse drivers, I think. A straight arm and glance back would be
    safer, as far as I can see.

    It's quite wide too- they had one fitted to a bike in the Cycle
    Surgery on the first floor.

    Complies with Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations
    Front Switches Control Front and Rear Indicators
    Wirefree Communication
    5 Super Bright White LED’s Head Light
    3 Super Bright Red LED’s Rear Light
    Flashing and Non-Flashing Lighting Modes
    8 Super Bright Orange LED’s Front Indicators
    6 Super Bright Orange LED’s Rear Indicators

  2. spindrift said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/grou...

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    You'd be a lot more visible but so few cyclists use them it would just
    confuse drivers, I think. A straight arm and glance back would be
    safer, as far as I can see.

    It's quite wide too- they had one fitted to a bike in the Cycle
    Surgery on the first floor.

    Complies with Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations
    Front Switches Control Front and Rear Indicators
    Wirefree Communication
    5 Super Bright White LED's Head Light
    3 Super Bright Red LED's Rear Light
    Flashing and Non-Flashing Lighting Modes
    8 Super Bright Orange LED's Front Indicators
    6 Super Bright Orange LED's Rear Indicators

    http://tinyurl.com/2z63ck

  3. spindrift said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/groupID/25/categoryID/171/v/620d8f4b-ce63-433f-9fff-b572c7281194

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    You'd be a lot more visible but so few cyclists use them it would just
    confuse drivers, I think. A straight arm and glance back would be
    safer, as far as I can see.

    It's quite wide too- they had one fitted to a bike in the Cycle
    Surgery on the first floor.

    Probably still not wide enough.

    When are inventors going to learn? A bicycle is too narrow for indicators -
    unless they're stuck out on stalks - which would spoil the ability to park
    the bike in a confined space... Unless perhaps the stalks were folding or
    telescopic. Oops, I think I've given away a billion-pound idea there :-)

    Still, I don't think I would want any indicators myself. It's nice to keep
    the amount accessories minimal on a bike - for the sake of saving weight,
    complication and money.

    ~PB

  4. I scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    When are inventors going to learn? A bicycle is too narrow for
    indicators - unless they're stuck out on stalks - which would spoil
    the ability to park the bike in a confined space...

    and also get through small gaps in traffic jams.

    ~PB

  5. spindrift said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/grou...

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    You'd be a lot more visible but so few cyclists use them it would just
    confuse drivers, I think. A straight arm and glance back would be
    safer, as far as I can see.

    It's quite wide too- they had one fitted to a bike in the Cycle
    Surgery on the first floor.

    Complies with Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations
    Front Switches Control Front and Rear Indicators
    Wirefree Communication
    5 Super Bright White LED's Head Light
    3 Super Bright Red LED's Rear Light
    Flashing and Non-Flashing Lighting Modes
    8 Super Bright Orange LED's Front Indicators
    6 Super Bright Orange LED's Rear Indicators

    Yes, well not me, I saw some when I went on a bike ride a couple of
    months ago.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/elyob/1776950877/in/set-72157602743406785/

    Must admit to feeling that they looked fairly ridiculous ...

  6. elyob said:
    spindrift said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/grou...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    Quoted message said:

    You'd be a lot more visible but so few cyclists use them it would just
    confuse drivers, I think. A straight arm and glance back would be
    safer, as far as I can see.

    Quoted message said:

    It's quite wide too- they had one fitted to a bike in the Cycle
    Surgery on the first floor.

    Quoted message said:

    Complies with Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations
    Front Switches Control Front and Rear Indicators
    Wirefree Communication
    5 Super Bright White LED's Head Light
    3 Super Bright Red LED's Rear Light
    Flashing and Non-Flashing Lighting Modes
    8 Super Bright Orange LED's Front Indicators
    6 Super Bright Orange LED's Rear Indicators

    Yes, well not me, I saw some when I went on a bike ride a couple of
    months ago.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/elyob/1776950877/in/set-72157602743406785/

    Must admit to feeling that they looked fairly ridiculous ...- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    Is there a formula for x = rich cyclists y = silly overpriced cycling
    tat?

  7. spindrift said:
    elyob said:

    On 3 Jan, 09:15, spindrift <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/grou....

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You'd be a lot more visible but so few cyclists use them it would just
    confuse drivers, I think. A straight arm and glance back would be
    safer, as far as I can see.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's quite wide too- they had one fitted to a bike in the Cycle
    Surgery on the first floor.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Complies with Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations
    Front Switches Control Front and Rear Indicators
    Wirefree Communication
    5 Super Bright White LED's Head Light
    3 Super Bright Red LED's Rear Light
    Flashing and Non-Flashing Lighting Modes
    8 Super Bright Orange LED's Front Indicators
    6 Super Bright Orange LED's Rear Indicators

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, well not me, I saw some when I went on a bike ride a couple of
    months ago.

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/elyob/1776950877/in/set-72157602743406785/

    Quoted message said:

    Must admit to feeling that they looked fairly ridiculous ...- Hide quoted text -

    Quoted message said:

    - Show quoted text -

    Is there a formula for x = rich cyclists y = silly overpriced cycling
    tat?

    Look at it this way, no one is going to steal your lights - no self
    respecting cycle thief would want such an uncool bit of tat.

    Sniper8052

  8. spindrift said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/grou...

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    I know a young MTBer who asked for serious off road lights for
    Christmas and got these. He was not impressed.

    Along with the other criticisms of them, they are surprisingly heavy
    for what they do. He thought it was because of a charger and then
    realised they came with disposables.

    Maybe they exist to be bought as presents.

    Rob

  9. elyob said:
    spindrift said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/grou...

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    You'd be a lot more visible but so few cyclists use them it would
    just confuse drivers, I think. A straight arm and glance back would
    be safer, as far as I can see.

    It's quite wide too- they had one fitted to a bike in the Cycle
    Surgery on the first floor.

    Complies with Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations
    Front Switches Control Front and Rear Indicators
    Wirefree Communication
    5 Super Bright White LED's Head Light
    3 Super Bright Red LED's Rear Light
    Flashing and Non-Flashing Lighting Modes
    8 Super Bright Orange LED's Front Indicators
    6 Super Bright Orange LED's Rear Indicators

    Yes, well not me, I saw some when I went on a bike ride a couple of
    months ago.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/elyob/1776950877/in/set-72157602743406785/

    Must admit to feeling that they looked fairly ridiculous ...

    They seem far too close together to work as an effective indicator to me.

  10. On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:34:16 -0000, Pete Biggs
    <[email hidden]>

    was popularly supposed to have said:

    When are inventors going to learn? A bicycle is too narrow for indicators -
    unless they're stuck out on stalks - which would spoil the ability to park
    the bike in a confined space... Unless perhaps the stalks were folding or
    telescopic. Oops, I think I've given away a billion-pound idea there :-)

    I saw something that would do the job somewhere, that fulfills all of
    your criteria.

    What you have is a cycling glove with yellow LEDs on it, and a
    push-to-make switch on the knuckle of the first finger, where your thumb
    can easily push it, but not where it is going to get squashed on
    otherwise.

    When you want to turn, stick your arm out as per normal, squeeze the
    switch and hey presto, flashy yellow lights on the end of your arm!

    Granted it is overkill for signalling, but you'd probably only need one
    for right turns as left turns aren't so important to signal.

    --
    Dan Holdsworth PhD [email hidden]
    By caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, By the beans of Java
    do thoughts acquire speed, hands acquire shaking, the shaking
    becomes a warning, By caffeine alone do I set my mind in motion

  11. Dan Holdsworth said:

    On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:34:16 -0000, Pete Biggs
    <[email hidden]>

    was popularly supposed to have said:

    When are inventors going to learn? A bicycle is too narrow for
    indicators - unless they're stuck out on stalks - which would spoil
    the ability to park the bike in a confined space... Unless perhaps
    the stalks were folding or telescopic. Oops, I think I've given
    away a billion-pound idea there :-)

    I saw something that would do the job somewhere, that fulfills all of
    your criteria.

    Not really*

    Quoted message said:

    What you have is a cycling glove with yellow LEDs on it, and a
    push-to-make switch on the knuckle of the first finger, where your
    thumb can easily push it, but not where it is going to get squashed on
    otherwise.

    When you want to turn, stick your arm out as per normal, squeeze the
    switch and hey presto, flashy yellow lights on the end of your arm!

    There is also this that comes on automatically:
    http://safeturn.com/the_product.html

    Quoted message said:

    Granted it is overkill for signalling,

    Agreed.

    Quoted message said:

    but you'd probably only need
    one for right turns as left turns aren't so important to signal.

    * A main advatage of electronic indicators should be that you don't have to
    stick your arm out, so lights on gloves or arms aren't quite in the same
    department.

    However, nothing on a bike is going to be better than sticking your arm out,
    so inventors (many of whom will have little cycle experience) will keep on
    inventing products that will fail.

    ~PB

  12. In article <b62204ec-c603-45f2-91c5-
    [email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    spindrift said:

    http://www.cyclesurgery.com/ProductDetails/mcs/productID/1026783/grou....

    I'm not sure i see the point, especially for £45!

    I know a young MTBer who asked for serious off road lights for
    Christmas and got these.

    Oh dear - but at least he'll be safer riding slalom now. :-)

  13. Dan Holdsworth said:

    What you have is a cycling glove with yellow LEDs on it, and a
    push-to-make switch on the knuckle of the first finger, where your thumb
    can easily push it, but not where it is going to get squashed on
    otherwise.

    Even simpler, halfords already sell reflective arm/leg bands, and they
    don't need batteries 🙂

    --
    Stephen Patterson :: [email hidden] :: http://patter.mine.nu/
    GPG: B416F0DE :: Jabber: [email hidden]
    "Don't be silly, Minnie. Who'd be walking round these cliffs with a gas oven?"

  14. In message <[email hidden]>

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Even simpler, halfords already sell reflective arm/leg bands, and they
    don't need batteries 🙂

    The velcro type are better than the snappy metal as IMHO you can
    adjust the tension.

    --
    Charles
    Brompton P6R-Plus; CarryFreedom -YL, in Motspur Park
    LCC; CTC.

  15. elyob said:

    Yes, well not me, I saw some when I went on a bike ride a couple of
    months ago.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/elyob/1776950877/in/set-72157602743406785/

    Yuck.

    That eats up all the handle bar space meaning,
    only one (position) lamp on the handle bars, and nothing powerful.
    No room for other gadgets (camera, computer or GPS) etc.

    Martin.

  16. Dan Holdsworth said:

    On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:34:16 -0000, Pete Biggs
    <[email hidden]>

    was popularly supposed to have said:

    When are inventors going to learn? A bicycle is too narrow for indicators -
    unless they're stuck out on stalks - which would spoil the ability to park
    the bike in a confined space... Unless perhaps the stalks were folding or
    telescopic. Oops, I think I've given away a billion-pound idea there :-)

    I saw something that would do the job somewhere, that fulfills all of
    your criteria.

    What you have is a cycling glove with yellow LEDs on it, and a
    push-to-make switch on the knuckle of the first finger, where your thumb
    can easily push it, but not where it is going to get squashed on
    otherwise.

    I have a fine pair of Altura gloves with reflective bits on. If I stick
    my arm out, traffic generally lets me change lane or turn. Mind you,
    that tended to happen even before I bought the gloves.

    Cheers,
    Luke

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.