Road Cycling · Public discussion

If you don't believe in Evolution, then why do you drive an SUV?

Started by donquijote1954 · · Last activity · 178 posts · 4,330 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
7 January 2008
Last activity
23 January 2008
Original author
donquijote1954
Posts
178
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,330
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 178
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    You belong on that donkey that Jesus rode.

    it just amazes me the insight that you have!! your religious knowlege is
    totally amazing!! you are making a major impact on our society!! you have
    insight that takes my breath away

    peter

  2. T. Ling Yu said:

    Red Cloud <[email hidden]> wrote innews:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Bike is too slow and too silence and unable to kill human being.

    Why would you want to kill human being with your bike, RC.
    That's horrible!

    When you are in an SUV you have POWER, power to kill power not to
    kill. But you don't get all hung up about it. You treat power
    casually, and keep chatting on your cell. It must look natural. You
    barely notice those poor monkeys trying to survive in their little
    bikes. Any death resulting from this must appear accidental.

  3. ilaboo said:

    suv here in new york city are now a dead issue

    what we now see are 1/2 ton 4 wheel drive pickups with double wheels in back
    and passenger cabs
    it really is depressing
    i can now understand the phd physicist burning suv dealerships

    i suspect after Katrina groups of people jsut killed the persons who totally
    disrupted the ability to suvive--drink all teh water/ eat all the food freak
    out becasue of no alcohol

    What do they need SUVs in NYC for, to tame the Asphalt Jungle?

  4. donquijote1954 <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    T. Ling Yu said:

    Red Cloud <[email hidden]> wrote
    innews:139ec435-3312-4ef6-be87-396fe


    [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Bike is too slow and too silence and unable to kill human being.

    Why would you want to kill human being with your bike, RC.
    That's horrible!

    When you are in an SUV you have POWER, power to kill power not to
    kill. But you don't get all hung up about it. You treat power
    casually, and keep chatting on your cell. It must look natural. You
    barely notice those poor monkeys trying to survive in their little
    bikes. Any death resulting from this must appear accidental.

    But why cell phone keep get smaller? Stupid American must need
    to want desire fat-ass cellphone with more power, no?

  5. T. Ling Yu said:

    donquijote1954 <[email hidden]> wrote innews:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    T. Ling Yu said:

    Red Cloud <[email hidden]> wrote
    innews:139ec435-3312-4ef6-be87-396fe


    [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Bike is too slow and too silence and unable to kill human being.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why would you want to kill human being with your bike, RC.
    That's horrible!

    Quoted message said:

    When you are in an SUV you have POWER, power to kill power not to
    kill. But you don't get all hung up about it. You treat power
    casually, and keep chatting on your cell. It must look natural. You
    barely notice those poor monkeys trying to survive in their little
    bikes. Any death resulting from this must appear accidental.

    But why cell phone keep get smaller? Stupid American must need
    to want desire fat-ass cellphone with more power, no?-

    Well, that's coming soon...

    http://www.txroadrunners.com/images/pics/funny5/BigNokiaCellPhone.jpg

    You can take it right on the bed of this SUV...

    http://www.marketingshift.com/2004/9/biggest-suv-navistar-international.cfm

  6. Pat said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    No, SUVs (or whatever vehicle you drive) don't run on water. They run
    on oil,


    Some of them run on corn (ethanol) now.

    No, at most there is only 15% ethanol mixed in with the gasoline.


    wrong e85 is 85% ethanol

  7. This T-shirt is not for oil junkies...

    http://www.zazzle.com/bike_for_peace_shirt-235671708848009326

  8. donquijote1954 said:
    Stephen Harding said:
    George Conklin said:

    If you are concerned with your health, you won't be riding a bicycle. Too
    many accidents per mile.

    Like how many?

    Cite please.

    It's just a fear the system plants on you. It doesn't have to be real
    though. Just enough so people give up bicycles and buy SUVs.

    That's a fair point.

    However I've come to believe people eschew bicycle commuting
    not so much because it's seen as a death wish, but more that
    such a view makes a convenient excuse.

    Let's face it, hopping in the dino-juice buggy can be awfully
    convenient!

    SMH

  9. I thought petroleum, and most hydrocarbons, was formerly primarily
    plant matter that had been trapped in sediment and covered by oceans,
    algae & stuff being the liquid petroleum and trees & stuff ending up
    as coal... but this discounts the whole abiogenic petroleum theory.

    I guess I'm not really sure where petroleum comes from, I suspect that
    it had to be deposited in the sediment way long before there were such
    things as dinosaurs (obviously the folks at Sinclair Oil co
    disagree). I just could live with myself if I believed that I was
    burning Fred's cute little Dino every time I lit the furnace.

    I'm not sure I follow the assertion of hypocrisy either. I think that
    people that don't believe that living things evolve believe that the
    world has always been like it is now and don't really subscribe to
    either the biogenic or abiogenic theory on the origin of petroleum...
    God created it on the eighth day but it was not deemed noteworthy at
    the time. But then I guess I'm a really bad representative of their
    ideas & beliefs.

    I don't think there's much debate about where the petroleum is going.

  10. DennisTheBald said:

    I thought petroleum, and most hydrocarbons, was formerly primarily
    plant matter that had been trapped in sediment and covered by oceans,
    algae & stuff being the liquid petroleum and trees & stuff ending up
    as coal... but this discounts the whole abiogenic petroleum theory.

    I guess I'm not really sure where petroleum comes from, I suspect that
    it had to be deposited in the sediment way long before there were such
    things as dinosaurs (obviously the folks at Sinclair Oil co
    disagree).  I just could live with myself if I believed that I was
    burning Fred's cute little Dino every time I lit the furnace.

    I'm not sure I follow the assertion of hypocrisy either.  I think that
    people that don't believe that living things evolve believe that the
    world has always been like it is now and don't really subscribe to
    either the biogenic or abiogenic theory on the origin of petroleum...
    God created it on the eighth day but it was not deemed noteworthy at
    the time.  But then I guess I'm a really bad representative of their
    ideas & beliefs.

    I don't think there's much debate about where the petroleum is going.

    Well, even if you concede that the origin or petroleum is
    "mysterious," it's clear that it contradicts the Bible's account of a
    recent creation. The dinosaurs too contradict the story of Noah's ark.
    Why God wiped them out?

    I think what it is that Christians are some monkeys that deny their
    ancestry while behaving like simple predators. Actually they are
    excellent survivors in this Darwinistic jungle where we live. But they
    forget one lesson from evolution itself, something the dinosaurs were
    too stupid to understand...

    "It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most
    intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." -Charles Darwin

  11. Another T-shirt not for oil junkies...

    http://www.zazzle.com/no_gasno_problem_shirt-235183723244701428

  12. I hope those who drive SUVs will like the SUBs. Just kidding...

    http://www.zazzle.com/bike_for_peace_shirt-235712478668290802

  13. Bill Sornson said:
    George Conklin said:

    "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Red Cloud wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > That's honest opinion being American consumer automobile addicted
    > culture.  Sure Americans are fighting for green stuff but that's
    > just window dressing. In deepest psyche of America, they are all
    > desire to drive SUV and Hummer. That is the American psyche. Driving
    > big car, driving like NASCAR are their passion and psyche. This is
    > why bicycle will never be the public transporatation in America.
    > Bike is too slow and too silence and unable to kill human being.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Only missing thing photo Red Cloud tear in eye.  HHT!  SB

    Quoted message said:

    If you are concerned with your health, you won't be riding a
    bicycle.  Too many accidents per mile.

    First of all, WHOOSH.

    Secondly, I'm well over 20,000 miles now, with zero accidents.  When should
    I start getting scared?!?

    Bill "now mountain biking is a far different story" S.-

    Well, I can see you are a survivor. But when they invite people like
    you to national TV, maybe many will imitate you. Monkey see monkey
    do. 😉

    The problem is nobody talks about heroes like you, while SUV
    commercials flash every 5 minutes.

  14. ilaboo aka Peter Lener said:

    suv here in new york city are now a dead issue

    what we now see are 1/2 ton 4 wheel drive pickups with double wheels in back
    and passenger cabs...

    Wrong. No such thing as a one-half (1/2) ton pick-up truck with dual
    rear wheels in back. If it has dual rear wheels, it is either a one (1)
    ton pickup or "commercial duty" pickup.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth

  15. "donquijote1954" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:ccce08e9-4fd1-4ae6-8228-Well, I can see you are > Monkey see monkey do.
    😉

    I had sea monkeys when I was a kid...

  16. Amy Blankenship said:

    I had sea monkeys when I was a kid...

    Penicillin clear things up?

  17. "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Amy Blankenship said:

    I had sea monkeys when I was a kid...

    Penicillin clear things up?

    You only need that if you feed them too much. Clouds the water.


  18. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > No, SUVs (or whatever vehicle you drive) don't run on water. They run
    > on oil,
    Some of them run on corn (ethanol) now.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    No, at most there is only 15% ethanol mixed in with the gasoline.


    wrong e85 is 85% ethanol

    Well, then, the signs on the gas pumps are incorrect when they state: "May
    contain up to 15% ethanol."

  19. Jack May said:

    "Stephen Harding" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:Zhxgj.9242$Xo1.4668@trnddc06...

    Quoted message said:
    Jack May said:

    "Stephen Harding" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    I think I read that during the Carboniferous period that
    the earth was as hot as it has ever been.

    Quoted message said:

    ISTR that one of the reasons was due to large amounts of
    water vapor in the air (volcanoes?  geothermal activity?).
    Can't remember what the source of it was.  Maybe just
    evaporation from oceans.

    Quoted message said:

    At any rate, the air can be very heavily saturated with
    water without it raining, or without rain clearing up
    the humidity.  Check out many of the tropical locations
    of the world where heavy rains don't lessen humidity.

    From:

    http://www.wxdude.com/humidity.html

    Air can only hold 100% relative humidity.  For rain the 100% relative
    humidity is at the altitude where the rain is coming from, not the ground
    where the humidity gage is normally.  It takes some time for the 100%
    humidity "mist" to form into drops which fall as rain.  There are cases
    where there can be super cooled water being more than 100%, but that is
    rare.

    So for all practical purposes vapor is not going to do much to increase
    global warming because it will precipitate out as rain when it reaches 100%
    humidity at some place in the atmosphere.  Since we get rain now, the air is
    often saturated at some place with the maximum moisture it can hold.

    There are three gases emitted by aircraft which contribute to global
    warming: H2O, CO2 and NOx The most obvious is the water vapour which
    forms condensation trails - clouds of frozen ice crystals. Since the
    air in the upper troposphere (the level at which most commerical
    planes fly) is naturally very dry, water vapour emitted by aircraft
    can make a big difference. Sometimes the contrails cover the whole
    sky. Have you ever wondered, why the sky is so much clearer in remoter
    locations?

    Although these contrails reflect a little sunlight away from earth,
    they reflect back to earth much more invisible infra-red (heat)
    radiation which would otherwise escape to space - and therefore they
    have an overall warming effect. This is hard to measure accurately,
    because the contrails eventually spread out and become
    indistinguishable from natural cirrus clouds.

    Not all of the water vapour forms contrails, but water is itself a
    "greenhouse gas" which also traps this outgoing infra-red radiation.
    Each water molecule traps much more heat and also survives much longer
    at this height than it would do at sea-level.

    Jet-fuel - kerosene - is a mixture of substances produced by
    distilling crude oil, which can be represented by C13H28. The chemical
    equation for burning it is as follows:
    2C13H28 + 40O2 =>26CO2 + 28H2O

    So you can see, that for every 14 water molecules produced, the
    aircraft must also emit 13 of CO2. This is also a greenhouse gas and
    will stay in the atmosphere warming the earth for an average of 100
    years, some of it for 1000s of years. There's no way that you can get
    the energy from such fossil fuel without producing that much CO2. It's
    not a by-product that can be "scrubbed" from the exhaust.

  20. Pat said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> No, SUVs (or whatever vehicle you drive) don't run on water. They run
    >> on oil,
    > Some of them run on corn (ethanol) now.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    No, at most there is only 15% ethanol mixed in with the gasoline.


    wrong e85 is 85% ethanol

    Well, then, the signs on the gas pumps are incorrect when they state: "May
    contain up to 15% ethanol."


    Here is the wiki link :
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E85

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 2 guests ·0 bots ·2 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.