Road Cycling · Public discussion

Wal-Mart Italian Road Bike for $1198

Started by SMS · · Last activity · 62 posts · 2,396 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 May 2008
Last activity
11 May 2008
Original author
SMS
Posts
62
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,396
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 62
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Cathy Kearns said:


    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    | One significant implication is that very large and very small frames
    | have mostly vanished from the scene.

    Very small sizes have been a consumer "problem" for years. Customers
    shorter
    than, say, 5'2 or so, may very well benefit from having 650c wheels
    instead
    of 700c. But such bikes sit & rot on the floor, because they don't look
    "normal" or because some ill-advised friend says you don't want 650c
    wheels
    because you won't be able to get tires & tubes easily.

    So I can find blue tires for my 650c wheels? Where? (Your brother's
    store is close....)

    I have a women's geometry 5000 trek from a few years back. I remember
    test riding a slightly larger 5000, which we determined was too large.
    And a different model women's trek the size of my bike. Both had 700c
    wheels. I ordered the my bike, and didn't ask if it would have smaller
    wheels, since the neither of those I test road had the smaller wheels.
    Yes, they certainly look precious, but the bike does fit me.

    However, the guys and girls on my rides all have 700c tires. When
    someone has an extremely bad day, and goes through their stash of tubes,
    the others can loan them tires. If I have an extremely bad day I'm
    getting a ride home. (But with the cute little wheels the bike will fit
    in any car.) My husband and I needed two different stashes of tubes at
    home. I have 650c wheels, and I can tell you, you don't want 650c wheels.

    Calling ISO 571-mm (aka 650C) wheels small is very odd.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  2. Mike Jacoubowsky said:


    Chalo wrote:

    | One significant implication is that very large and very small frames
    | have mostly vanished from the scene.

    Very small sizes have been a consumer "problem" for years. Customers shorter
    than, say, 5'2 or so, may very well benefit from having 650c wheels instead
    of 700c. But such bikes sit & rot on the floor, because they don't look
    "normal" or because some ill-advised friend says you don't want 650c wheels
    because you won't be able to get tires & tubes easily.

    But for the larger sizes, there is some hope. Completely out of the blue,
    Trek decided to build a 64cm Madone this year. We sell quite a few of them.
    For years, 62cm was the largest, so those over 6'3 were either difficult or
    impossible to fit. We have now successfully fit someone 6'7 to a
    high-quality road bike.

    High-quality road bike? I thought the Madone was made out of plastic
    and formed in a mold. I know it's expensive for what it is, but taken
    all together that would make Madones the equivalent of '80s Oakley
    sunglasses-- cooked up like polymer waffles and sold at an umpteen
    squillion percent markup.

    I have a 68cm Nishiki road frame, a 68cm Fuji road frame, and a 68cm
    Cannondale road frame, and in the past I had a 68cm Schwinn road
    frame. I find it a bit puzzling that the "technology" of making
    frames for all sizes of adults seems to have been lost. I'm
    especially puzzled in light of the fact that plastic Treks have always
    been lugged, and thus could have been made in just about any size,
    like the lugged frames of yore.

    Chalo

  3. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Cathy Kearns said:


    I have a women's geometry 5000 trek from a few years back. I remember
    test riding a slightly larger 5000, which we determined was too large.
    And a different model women's trek the size of my bike. Both had 700c
    wheels. I ordered the my bike, and didn't ask if it would have smaller
    wheels, since the neither of those I test road had the smaller wheels.
    Yes, they certainly look precious, but the bike does fit me.

    However, the guys and girls on my rides all have 700c tires. When
    someone has an extremely bad day, and goes through their stash of tubes,
    the others can loan them tires. If I have an extremely bad day I'm
    getting a ride home. (But with the cute little wheels the bike will fit
    in any car.) My husband and I needed two different stashes of tubes at
    home. I have 650c wheels, and I can tell you, you don't want 650c
    wheels.

    Calling ISO 571-mm (aka 650C) wheels small is very odd.

    I believe I called them smallER than 700c wheels. Really, you think they
    are the same size or something?

    My problem is the 700c is so much more common than the 650c wheels that it's
    almost a standard. Non-standard equipment is always harder to deal with.

  4. Tom Sherman said:
    SMS aka Steven M. Scharf said:

    [...]
    Carbon frames that large tend to have problems of too much flex, which
    is what the reviews of the 64cm Madone found. Colnago seems to have
    solved this problem in their carbon fiber frames and they go up to 65 cm.


    The larger CFRP frames being too flexible is just poor engineering, and
    has nothing to do with the inherent properties of CFRP.

    To reduce the flex in the larger frames requires some engineering
    enhancements because of the the inherent properties of carbon fiber.
    Apparently Trek just made the frame larger, without understanding that
    this wouldn't work.

    Colnago describes what they did at
    "http://www.colnago.com/en/catalogo2008/extremepower.php".

  5. SMS aka Steven M. Scharf said:
    Tom Sherman said:
    SMS aka Steven M. Scharf said:

    [...]
    Carbon frames that large tend to have problems of too much flex,
    which is what the reviews of the 64cm Madone found. Colnago seems to
    have solved this problem in their carbon fiber frames and they go up
    to 65 cm.


    The larger CFRP frames being too flexible is just poor engineering,
    and has nothing to do with the inherent properties of CFRP.

    To reduce the flex in the larger frames requires some engineering
    enhancements because of the the inherent properties of carbon fiber.

    Specifically what properties? Elastic modulus - all solids have one,
    just differing in magnitude. Steel, aluminium alloy and
    titanium/titanium alloy frames also need to be designed differently in
    larger sizes to keep them from being more flexible than smaller sizes.

    Quoted message said:

    Apparently Trek just made the frame larger, without understanding that
    this wouldn't work.

    Colnago describes what they did at
    "http://www.colnago.com/en/catalogo2008/extremepower.php".


    "The Extreme-Power was born to meet the demands of sprinters Alessandro
    Petacchi and Erik Zabel of Team Milram and three time World Champion
    Oscar Freire of Team Rabobank who all have a power output of 180 kg for
    each pedal stroke."

    WTF? When did the kilogram (kg) become a unit of power instead of mass?

    Quick, notify the General Conference on Weights and Measures of this change!

    Do people actually get paid to write this stuff?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  6. Cathy Kearns said:


    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Cathy Kearns said:


    I have a women's geometry 5000 trek from a few years back. I
    remember test riding a slightly larger 5000, which we determined was
    too large. And a different model women's trek the size of my bike.
    Both had 700c wheels. I ordered the my bike, and didn't ask if it
    would have smaller wheels, since the neither of those I test road had
    the smaller wheels. Yes, they certainly look precious, but the bike
    does fit me.

    However, the guys and girls on my rides all have 700c tires. When
    someone has an extremely bad day, and goes through their stash of
    tubes, the others can loan them tires. If I have an extremely bad
    day I'm getting a ride home. (But with the cute little wheels the
    bike will fit in any car.) My husband and I needed two different
    stashes of tubes at home. I have 650c wheels, and I can tell you,
    you don't want 650c wheels.

    Calling ISO 571-mm (aka 650C) wheels small is very odd.

    I believe I called them smallER than 700c wheels.

    And you also called them "cute little wheels".

    Quoted message said:

    Really, you think they are the same size or something?

    No, ISO 571-mm wheels are actually quite large.

    This is a bicycle with cute little wheels:
    <http://www.cycleurope.co.jp/2008/novt.html>.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  7. Cathy Kearns said:


    However, the guys and girls on my rides all have 700c tires. When someone
    has an extremely bad day, and goes through their stash of tubes, the others
    can loan them tires. If I have an extremely bad day I'm getting a ride
    home. (But with the cute little wheels the bike will fit in any car.) My
    husband and I needed two different stashes of tubes at home. I have 650c
    wheels, and I can tell you, you don't want 650c wheels.

    My wife and I often ride together, her on her bike with 700x28 tires
    on 20mm wide rims, and me on my bike with 700x60 tires and 38mm wide
    rims. We have to have different sized tubes with us. I might be able
    to swipe one of her tubes if I were riding one of my 700x40 equipped
    single-speeds, but she would have some difficulty using one of mine.

    That little detail is not enough to make me want to use the same size
    tire as she does.

    Chalo

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    ZBicyclist said:
    Quoted message said:


    Your forgot one...the sizing of XXXXXL for quite a few of the
    Wally
    World shoppers!!!!!

    Yes, "Size 3" in the women's section is XXXL, "Size 5" is XXXXXL,
    etc.

    I never knew women's sizes were in Roman numerals.

    A size 5 must be a willowy whisper of a woman indeed.
    In fact, pretty much an imaginary friend.

    The PC version of S/M/L is: Petite/Medium/pLus.
    I dunno if there's such a thing as a plus-sized
    women's bike. If there is, I'm game to hang around
    with the women who ride 'em. If they're willing to
    hang around with (IOW, put up with) me. Especially
    if they'd let me try out their bikes. I'd let them
    try out mine, which would probably be a pretty good
    plus-sized women's bike.

    I don't do arm wrestling with women, though.
    Not any more. It's too embarrassing when I lose.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    Nothing is safe from me.
    I'm really at:
    tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca

  9. Mike Jacoubowsky said:

    "SMS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | I see some bicycles in bike shops that also come in that kind of sizing,
    | though they sometimes have XS, and XL as well.

    Which isn't great, but it's a retreat from Giant's original idea that,
    indeed, you could fit everybody with a very small number of sizes. I don't
    know if there's a magic number, it bit seems that, with 13 different sizes
    for many of my bikes (8 men's, 5 women's), if I can't fit someone, I need to
    find a new business. Trust me, I can understand the desire to tame
    inventory! However, the desire to properly fit people so they really enjoy
    riding is more important.

    Well since you're in the business, I guess I have to cut you
    some slack on critiquing the micro-fit view of getting someone
    on a properly sized bike.

    However I'm of the school that a small number of frame sizes
    actually are all that is needed to produce "suitable fit".

    I have road bikes of 58 and 60cm sizes (Trek 520 and 2000)
    and mountain bikes of 54cm and 22 inch (dumpster rescued Trek
    7000 and Raleigh Mojave 5.0).

    With the addition of stem extenders and high rise, long stems
    and many long seat posts available on the market, all my bikes
    are quite comfortable.

    They are different enough that when I get on one of them after
    an absence of some time, they can "feel funny" at first, but I
    have ridden some of these bikes very long distances. Last
    year I broke my saddle time record while on a tour with over 9
    hours of actual peddling in a day. No real problems.

    Add to this the adjustability of the body itself, I think you
    can have a very small number of bike sizes, combined with stem
    and seatpost lengths/adjustments to handle proper fit of almost
    anyone.

    You're always going to have some small/large sized person
    outliers that require more custom fits, but I believe three
    sizes of bike in some S/M/L grouping would be sufficient for
    90+% of the pedaling public.

    SMH

  10. Chalo Colina said:
    Cathy Kearns said:

    However, the guys and girls on my rides all have 700c tires. When someone
    has an extremely bad day, and goes through their stash of tubes, the others
    can loan them tires. If I have an extremely bad day I'm getting a ride
    home. (But with the cute little wheels the bike will fit in any car.) My
    husband and I needed two different stashes of tubes at home. I have 650c
    wheels, and I can tell you, you don't want 650c wheels.

    My wife and I often ride together, her on her bike with 700x28 tires
    on 20mm wide rims, and me on my bike with 700x60 tires and 38mm wide
    rims. We have to have different sized tubes with us. I might be able
    to swipe one of her tubes if I were riding one of my 700x40 equipped
    single-speeds, but she would have some difficulty using one of mine.

    That little detail is not enough to make me want to use the same size
    tire as she does.


    Does not your wife weigh about 1/3 Chalo?

    Similarly, having two similar size riders on a tandem with the same tire
    sizes and inflation pressures as they use on their singles would be silly.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  11. Stephen Harding said:

    With the addition of stem extenders and high rise, long stems
    and many long seat posts available on the market, all my bikes
    are quite comfortable.

    That reminds me of the old Midas commercial where the competitor only
    has one model of muffler, and the mechanic says "fit? we'll MAKE it fit"
    and brings out a bunch of adapters and pipes.

    What you're doing will work, but it's the wrong way of getting the bike
    to fit.

  12. Tom Sherman said:


    Chalo Colina said:


    Cathy Kearns said:


    My
    husband and I needed two different stashes of tubes at home. I have 650c
    wheels, and I can tell you, you don't want 650c wheels.

    Quoted message said:

    My wife and I often ride together, her on her bike with 700x28 tires
    on 20mm wide rims, and me on my bike with 700x60 tires and 38mm wide
    rims. We have to have different sized tubes with us. I might be able
    to swipe one of her tubes if I were riding one of my 700x40 equipped
    single-speeds, but she would have some difficulty using one of mine.

    Quoted message said:

    That little detail is not enough to make me want to use the same size
    tire as she does.

    Does not your wife weigh about 1/3 Chalo?

    It wouldn't be circumspect of me to discuss that. You can draw your
    own conclusions:

    http://datribean.com/presskit.html

    She's about 5'8" tall.

    Quoted message said:

    Similarly, having two similar size riders on a tandem with the same tire
    sizes and inflation pressures as they use on their singles would be silly.

    I was only demonstrating that using the same rim diameter does not
    necessarily mean you can interchange consumables.

    I used to believe that at a given pressure, tire width should be
    proportional to the load (or conversely, that at a given tire width,
    pressure should be proportional to load). Observation has shown me
    that tire internal volume serves as a better indicator of load
    capacity and/or appropriate pressure. My bike with 700x35 tires (32mm
    actual) is the closest equivalent I have to my wife's bike with 700x28
    tires (26mm actual). Those bikes can probably use the same tubes and
    tires if the need arises.

    Chalo

  13. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The larger CFRP frames being too flexible is just poor engineering, and
    has nothing to do with the inherent properties of CFRP.

    To reduce the flex in the larger frames requires some engineering
    enhancements because of the the inherent properties of carbon fiber.
    Apparently Trek just made the frame larger, without understanding that
    this wouldn't work.

    Your information is... interesting. I've sold a number of these bikes, all
    of them to people who rode other machines and were more than impressed with
    how the Trek rode. Being too-flexy was never once mentioned. You could
    (reasonably) argue that the sample size I refer to are those who have
    actually purchased the bikes, which results in a strong bias. Except that I
    don't have much of anything else to go on, because people-of-height who ride
    them invariably buy them.

    And the "engineering enhancements" are definitely there. The 5.5 version of
    the frame doesn't use the same layup found on any of the other sizes, and
    the fittings etc are unique, and specifically designed for, that size.
    That's the case for every Trek size; there's nothing unusual about having to
    do that. If a quality manufacturer were to build a 47cm frame the same way
    they build a 58cm, the 47cm would be dramatically overbuilt (or the 58cm
    underbuilt). With carbon fiber, there's no reason to do that, unless you're
    trying to save money where it shouldn't be saved.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    "SMS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Sherman said:
    SMS aka Steven M. Scharf said:

    [...]
    Carbon frames that large tend to have problems of too much flex, which
    is what the reviews of the 64cm Madone found. Colnago seems to have
    solved this problem in their carbon fiber frames and they go up to 65
    cm.


    The larger CFRP frames being too flexible is just poor engineering, and
    has nothing to do with the inherent properties of CFRP.

    To reduce the flex in the larger frames requires some engineering
    enhancements because of the the inherent properties of carbon fiber.
    Apparently Trek just made the frame larger, without understanding that
    this wouldn't work.

    Colnago describes what they did at
    "http://www.colnago.com/en/catalogo2008/extremepower.php".

  14. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But for the larger sizes, there is some hope. Completely out of the blue,
    Trek decided to build a 64cm Madone this year. We sell quite a few of
    them.[...]

    Was it really "completely out of the blue" or did people like you (Trek
    dealers) ask for the larger size?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia

    Tom: We'd been asking for years, and pretty much given up. Especially with a
    new, very-expensive (in terms of front-loaded costs per size of frame)
    model. So it was "completely out of the blue" in terms of being unexpected,
    but it certainly had been asked for. By us, and many others. Vociferously.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:

    [...]
    But for the larger sizes, there is some hope. Completely out of the blue,
    Trek decided to build a 64cm Madone this year. We sell quite a few of
    them.[...]

    Was it really "completely out of the blue" or did people like you (Trek
    dealers) ask for the larger size?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  15. Tom Sherman said:
    Quoted message said:

    Colnago describes what they did at
    "http://www.colnago.com/en/catalogo2008/extremepower.php".


    "The Extreme-Power was born to meet the demands of sprinters
    Alessandro Petacchi and Erik Zabel of Team Milram and three time
    World Champion Oscar Freire of Team Rabobank who all have a power
    output of 180 kg
    for each pedal stroke."

    WTF? When did the kilogram (kg) become a unit of power instead of
    mass?
    Quick, notify the General Conference on Weights and Measures of
    this
    change!
    Do people actually get paid to write this stuff?

    Watts your problem?

  16. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But for the larger sizes, there is some hope. Completely out of the blue,
    Trek decided to build a 64cm Madone this year. We sell quite a few of
    them.
    For years, 62cm was the largest, so those over 6'3 were either difficult
    or
    impossible to fit. We have now successfully fit someone 6'7 to a
    high-quality road bike.

    High-quality road bike? I thought the Madone was made out of plastic
    and formed in a mold. I know it's expensive for what it is, but taken
    all together that would make Madones the equivalent of '80s Oakley
    sunglasses-- cooked up like polymer waffles and sold at an umpteen
    squillion percent markup.

    Plastic? That's like someone telling you that your Nishiki & Fuji &
    Cannondale are made from refined dirt.

    Oh. Darn. They are. You could make an argument that just about everything
    is.

    Unless... unless it's made of materials produced in a cyclotron!

    Quoted message said:

    I have a 68cm Nishiki road frame, a 68cm Fuji road frame, and a 68cm
    Cannondale road frame, and in the past I had a 68cm Schwinn road
    frame. I find it a bit puzzling that the "technology" of making
    frames for all sizes of adults seems to have been lost. I'm
    especially puzzled in light of the fact that plastic Treks have always
    been lugged, and thus could have been made in just about any size,
    like the lugged frames of yore.

    I can't speak for the Fuji and Cannondale, whose designs (primarily tube
    diameter and, to a lesser degree, wall thickness) may very well have been
    scaled up for the greater stresses incurred with such a large frame size.
    But your Nishiki, if it's from the old days, probably was not such a design.
    Back in the days when steel was king, manufacturers nearly always used
    exactly the same diameters, and quite often even the same wall thicknesses,
    throughout their size range. Thankfully, in the largest sizes, butted tubing
    often wasn't available so at least you had slightly more robust tubes than
    would otherwise be the case.

    Because the frames were lugged, tubing diameter was restricted to the same
    size for all frames, because oversized production-style (cheap) lugs simply
    did not exist. And, assuming your Nishiki was built this way, you're
    experiencing a design that works much better for smaller sizes than for what
    you ride.

    The move to welded aluminum removed many of the cost constraints that
    prevented using optimal designs for larger frame sizes, although it remained
    rare to see a company actually take advantage of this. But for the most
    part, even though it was technically easier to build a better, taller frame
    out of aluminum, manufacturers abandoned the concept of building taller
    frames in general, in an attempt to economize by optimizing their offerings
    for the most-popular sizes and getting rid of those that sold in small
    quantities.

    Getting back to Trek, the "lugs" used are made differently for
    different-sized frames. This adds very little cost, since each lugset is
    different for each size frame to begin with, requiring its own mold and
    layup schedule. It's not something that can be reshaped or cut & welded into
    a different configuration like a steel lug might be. So then, you ask, why
    hasn't Trek made the larger sizes available all along? Because the cost of
    each set of molds for each size of frame is *very* expensive, and fringe
    sizes quite likely won't amortize out the cost of the fittings (because the
    volume won't be high enough) before the model runs its course.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:


    Chalo wrote:

    | One significant implication is that very large and very small frames
    | have mostly vanished from the scene.

    Very small sizes have been a consumer "problem" for years. Customers
    shorter
    than, say, 5'2 or so, may very well benefit from having 650c wheels
    instead
    of 700c. But such bikes sit & rot on the floor, because they don't look
    "normal" or because some ill-advised friend says you don't want 650c
    wheels
    because you won't be able to get tires & tubes easily.

    But for the larger sizes, there is some hope. Completely out of the blue,
    Trek decided to build a 64cm Madone this year. We sell quite a few of
    them.
    For years, 62cm was the largest, so those over 6'3 were either difficult
    or
    impossible to fit. We have now successfully fit someone 6'7 to a
    high-quality road bike.

    High-quality road bike? I thought the Madone was made out of plastic
    and formed in a mold. I know it's expensive for what it is, but taken
    all together that would make Madones the equivalent of '80s Oakley
    sunglasses-- cooked up like polymer waffles and sold at an umpteen
    squillion percent markup.

    I have a 68cm Nishiki road frame, a 68cm Fuji road frame, and a 68cm
    Cannondale road frame, and in the past I had a 68cm Schwinn road
    frame. I find it a bit puzzling that the "technology" of making
    frames for all sizes of adults seems to have been lost. I'm
    especially puzzled in light of the fact that plastic Treks have always
    been lugged, and thus could have been made in just about any size,
    like the lugged frames of yore.

    Chalo

  17. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    With the addition of stem extenders and high rise, long stems
    and many long seat posts available on the market, all my bikes
    are quite comfortable.

    That reminds me of the old Midas commercial where the competitor only has
    one model of muffler, and the mechanic says "fit? we'll MAKE it fit" and
    brings out a bunch of adapters and pipes.

    We explain (when we don't have the right size in stock, and somebody expects
    us to make something else fit) that we used to have an alternative that
    worked for all but those too-tall for our largest frame. A "rack" in our
    warehouse where we could stretch the customer to fit the frame. The problem
    was that we couldn't get adequate sound proofing to muffle the screams, and
    the noises would attract a very odd clientele to the shop.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    "SMS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Stephen Harding said:

    With the addition of stem extenders and high rise, long stems
    and many long seat posts available on the market, all my bikes
    are quite comfortable.

    That reminds me of the old Midas commercial where the competitor only has
    one model of muffler, and the mechanic says "fit? we'll MAKE it fit" and
    brings out a bunch of adapters and pipes.

    What you're doing will work, but it's the wrong way of getting the bike to
    fit.

  18. Mike Jacoubowsky said:


    Chalo said:


    I thought the Madone was made out of plastic
    and formed in a mold. I know it's expensive for what it is, but taken
    all together that would make Madones the equivalent of '80s Oakley
    sunglasses-- cooked up like polymer waffles and sold at an umpteen
    squillion percent markup.

    Plastic? That's like someone telling you that your Nishiki & Fuji &
    Cannondale are made from refined dirt.

    No, it's like saying they are made from "metal" rather than "quad-
    butted Valite!"

    Madone frames, like all CFRP frames, are made from charred
    polyacrylonitrile resin-- that's plastic, by the way-- in a matrix of
    epoxy resin. Which is, y'know, plastic. Plastic is the least
    marketing-termish thing you could call them.

    Chalo

  19. Chalo Colina said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Chalo said:

    I thought the Madone was made out of plastic
    and formed in a mold. I know it's expensive for what it is, but taken
    all together that would make Madones the equivalent of '80s Oakley
    sunglasses-- cooked up like polymer waffles and sold at an umpteen
    squillion percent markup.


    Plastic? That's like someone telling you that your Nishiki & Fuji &
    Cannondale are made from refined dirt.

    No, it's like saying they are made from "metal" rather than "quad-
    butted Valite!"

    Madone frames, like all CFRP frames, are made from charred
    polyacrylonitrile resin-- that's plastic, by the way-- in a matrix of
    epoxy resin. Which is, y'know, plastic. Plastic is the least
    marketing-termish thing you could call them.


    I thought plastic referred to non-recoverable deformation, not a
    material type. The correct term is polymer.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  20. Chalo said:

    Madone frames, like all CFRP frames, are made from charred
    polyacrylonitrile resin-- that's plastic, by the way-- in a matrix of
    epoxy resin. Which is, y'know, plastic. Plastic is the least
    marketing-termish thing you could call them.

    I love my 08 Madone 6.9, its an awesome race bike.
    That said, my daily ride is an alloy track bike with front brake.
    Neither of them are exactly practical, but my steel-is-real tourer has
    barely been ridden in 9 months. Its time will come again.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.