http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Here's the America You Want
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 7 May 2008
- Last activity
- 10 May 2008
- Original author
- Tom Kunich
- Posts
- 18
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 662
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
-
"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
It certainly demonstrates your personality that you'd believe today's
opinion of HISTORIANS!I guess that neatly demonstrates your grasp of history.
-
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
Quoted message said:
It certainly demonstrates your personality that you'd believe today's
opinion of HISTORIANS!I guess that neatly demonstrates your grasp of history.
What does that have to do with cycling?
Andre
-
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
Quoted message said:
It certainly demonstrates your personality that you'd believe today's
opinion of HISTORIANS!Let's see: climate scientists aren't to be believed about climate
science, historians aren't to be believed about history, professors of
health policy aren't to be believed about health policy, evolutionary
biologists aren't to be believed about evolution, and economists
aren't to be believed about the economy. -
"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
Quoted message said:
It certainly demonstrates your personality that you'd believe today's
opinion of HISTORIANS!Let's see: climate scientists aren't to be believed about climate
science, historians aren't to be believed about history, professors of
health policy aren't to be believed about health policy, evolutionary
biologists aren't to be believed about evolution, and economists
aren't to be believed about the economy.Psst - MOST "climate scientists" deny "global warming". Most of that list of
scientists who AGREE with global warming do not have anything to do with
climate or atmospheric science. -
"Andre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
What does that have to do with cycling?Andre, my apologies and I'll try to just post on cycling for now.
-
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
Quoted message said:
It certainly demonstrates your personality that you'd believe today's
opinion of HISTORIANS!I guess that neatly demonstrates your grasp of history.
Sorry Tom, I don't see a Truman like reversal of opinion on this one.
Bill C -
Tom Kunich said:
Quoted message said:
It certainly demonstrates your personality that you'd believe today's
opinion of HISTORIANS!Robert Chung said:
Let's see: climate scientists aren't to be believed about climate science,
historians aren't to be believed about history, professors of health
policy aren't to be believed about health policy, evolutionary biologists
aren't to be believed about evolution, and economists aren't to be
believed about the economy.What about sexoligists ?
-
On 5/7/08 4:38 PM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
I have one of these BofA's around the corner here in the hood where I live.
It is a fricken NIGHTMARE ZOO at that place! Like a damn busy starbucks! No
other bank around here is like them in terms of the crowds. The cars coming
in and out of this place is like the DMV!! They have 3 ATMs out front that
have a dozen people in line all the time!The only thing around here that is worse?? The damn Albertsons, they take
WIC, food stamps and all other freebie welfare handouts. -
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
It sound like free enterprise to me. What's your take on that?
-
ST said:
The only thing around here that is worse?? The damn Albertsons, they take
WIC, food stamps and all other freebie welfare handouts.I think you need to clarify this a wee bit...
Bill C -
Bill C said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
On May 7, 4:38 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.aspQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
It certainly demonstrates your personality that you'd believe today's
opinion of HISTORIANS!Quoted message said:
I guess that neatly demonstrates your grasp of history.
Sorry Tom, I don't see a Truman like reversal of opinion on this one.
"Even a blind pig can occasionally root up a turnip." -- Silence
DogoodEven a poor quality historian can occasionally identify a bad
prezident.Root around hnn. You'll find some funny looking turnips.
-
Bret said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
It sound like free enterprise to me. What's your take on that?
I'm generally speaking in support of free enterprise, but there are
times when common sense and/or govt. restrictions may be in order.
For example, I'm pretty sure I'm solidly against drug dealing, even if
in the strictest sense it is free enterprise. On a similar note, I'm
not sure I'm in support of corporations conducting enterprises that at
worst encourage, or at the least mitigate the hardships of, illegal
immigration.On another note, where's the liberal outcry over the userous interest
rates that are being charged to these poor, disadvantaged people who
have no where else to turn for credit? -
Scott said:
Bret said:
On May 7, 5:38 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
Quoted message said:
It sound like free enterprise to me. What's your take on that?
At a glance, it sounds "free" to the extent it fits within the
existing legal paradigm. What if the paradigm changes?Free banking does not exist in the US.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_banking
In the article, note the so-called Free Banking Era in the US was not
wholesale free banking. Control was shifted to the states. -
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/08/AR2008050802999.html
-
Robert Chung said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/08/AR2008050802999.html
Ahhh, John Boehner. The man who described himself as "less tainted"
than most other GOP leaders. -
On May 10, 4:56 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 20:51:56 -0700 (PDT), Robert Chung
Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp
Quoted message said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/08/AR200...
Ahhh, John Boehner. The man who described himself as "less tainted"
than most other GOP leaders.Yeah, good piece. Bush is also going to veto the update to the GI Bill
because providing a better opportunity to go to college would harm
retention. I'm sure that most of you remember all the commercials
where they played up going to college while active, and getting it,
mostly, paid for as a big incentive. The realitry was, even then, that
duties really didn't allow the time to do it as the were "downsizing"
the military and almost everyone was running with massive manning
shortages, so it was a typical political promise. This time around
it's the Democrat/liberal folks, for whatever reason, looking out for
the troops out at the sharp end, and the Repoublicans and
administration looking out for the "perfumed princes" of the Pentagon,
and their corporate friends.
Bill C
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.