Cycling Training · Public discussion

Training in zones 2 & 4 only. ok or ?

Started by Bigbananabike · · Last activity · 1 post · 1,485 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Training
Published
12 March 2016
Last activity
12 March 2016
Original author
Bigbananabike
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,485
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In recent weeks I've started using a heart rate monitor again - seriously this time though.

    Previous to this I've realised most of my training had been in zone 3 (76 - 81%) which it seems is where we tire out but don't build endurance or high speed / strength either. Doh:oops:

    Reading up it seems to me the best places for my training (races with a few longer sportives typed races through the year) are zones 2 (65 - 75%) and occasional intervals (I do most of mine up hills) in zone 4 (75 - 82%)

    My average speed has dropped but I'm basically ignoring that and focusing on the short speed intervals and building up my easy endurance.

    Does this seem reasonable?
    What do you think I could do differently and why?

    Thanks, Paul 🙂

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.