Are we still debating the ideal frame size and style for a road bike for racing? I mean, come on, its not like the answer is going to change based on personal preference or riding style. Or is it? Do the experts here still claim that a certain frame size and style is superior to others, despite the lack of concrete evidence?
Whats the deal with the obsession over aero frames? Are we really convinced that shaving off a few grams and reducing wind resistance is going to make a significant difference in our racing performance? And what about the poor souls who are forced to ride compact frames because theyre not tall enough to fit on a proper racing bike? Do they just not deserve to be competitive?
And dont even get me started on the whole stack and reach debate. Is it really that complicated to figure out what works best for a given rider? Or are we just too lazy to do the actual math and instead rely on vague guidelines and anecdotal evidence? Inquiring minds want to know: whats the real science behind frame sizing, and why do we still see so many riders on bikes that are clearly too small or too large for them?