Road Cycling · Public discussion

If the UCI had age group winners

Started by Tony · · Last activity · 19 posts · 1,073 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
13 January 2004
Last activity
14 January 2004
Original author
Tony
Posts
19
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,073
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–19 of 19
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. These are the Best Riders by Age Group based on the 2003 season UCI rankings

    (Age, Name, UCI Points, Overall UCI Ranking, # of riders that age in UCI Top 100)

    42 years, Malcolm Elliot, 30 points, 925th, 0 41 years, Hilton McMurdo, 13 points , 1279th, 0 40
    years, Michael Carter, 55 points, 828th, 0 39 years, Jens Heppner, 174 points, 326th, 0 38 years,
    Gianni Faresin, 335 points, 160th, 0 37 years, Viatcheslav Ekimov, 693 points, 46th, 1 36 years,
    Mario Cipollini, 488 points, 85th, 2 35 years, Laurent Brochard, 961 points, 24th, 5 34 years, Jaan
    Kirsipuu, 879 points, 30th, 6 33 years, Erik Zabel, 2,088 points, 2nd, 8th, 12 32 years, Gilberto
    Simoni, 1715 points, 4th, 12 31 years, Michael Boogerd, 1,441 points, 9th, 7 30 years, Alexander
    Vinokourov, 1,641 points, 6th, 9 29 years, Paolo Bettini, 2,267 points, 1st, 8 28 years, Julian
    Dean, 706 points, 45th, 4 27 years, Danilo DiLuca, 1,344 points, 12th, 7 26 years, Iban Mayo, 1,425
    points, 10th, 11 25 years, Baden Cooke, 900 points, 29th, 8 24 years, Michael Rogers, 836 points,
    33th, 4 23 years, Alejandro Valverde points, 1,611, 7th, 6 22 years, Filipo Pozzato, 719 points,
    44th, 2 21 years, Tomas Vaitkus, 250 points, 222nd, 0 20 years, Niels Scheuneman, 163 points ,
    347th, 0 19 years, Thomas Lovkvist, 107 points, 480th, 0

  2. Tony said:

    31 years, Michael Boogerd, 1,441 points, 9th, 7

    So he did win something after all in 2003, great.

  3. "Tony" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    These are the Best Riders by Age Group based on the 2003 season UCI


    rankings

    Quoted message said:


    (Age, Name, UCI Points, Overall UCI Ranking, # of riders that age in UCI


    Top 100)

    Quoted message said:


    42 years, Malcolm Elliot, 30 points, 925th, 0

    Nice to know my dreams are not *completely* dead yet. :-)

    Won't be much longer though! Damn, it sucks getting old...

  4. Tony said:

    These are the Best Riders by Age Group based on the 2003 season UCI rankings

    Very cool. Thanks. mywebpage.netscape.compointsbyage.png

  5. Tony said:

    40 years, Michael Carter, 55 points, 828th, 0

    Wow. A US rider is UCI #1. 🙂

    If you had told me a US rider was #1 in his age in integral years, I'd have made the obvious guess.

    Dan

  6. Robert Chung said:

    mywebpage.netscape.compointsbyage.png

    All points per age would probably require a log scale.

  7. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Tony said:

    These are the Best Riders by Age Group based on the 2003 season UCI rankings

    Very cool. Thanks. mywebpage.netscape.compointsbyage.png

    Nice graphic. It would appear that Valverde is precocious, the 28 year cohort represented by Dean is
    lagging and that Zabel is the

  8. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Robert Chung said:

    mywebpage.netscape.compointsbyage.png

    All points per age would probably require a log scale.

    uci.ch20031109 M.zip

  9. Robert Chung said:

    uci.ch20031109 M.zip

    Thanks, I really had no idea where I might find that sort of info. I'll get scripting rightaway.
    (tonight actually, if you haven't done it by then).

  10. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Robert Chung said:

    uci.ch20031109 M.zip

    Thanks, I really had no idea where I might find that sort of info. I'll get scripting rightaway.
    (tonight actually, if you haven't done it by then).

    I leave it as an exercise for the reader. Grist for a frsc quiz.

    1965 appears not to have been a grand cru vintage year for cyclists.

  11. Robert Chung said:


    1965 appears not to have been a grand cru vintage year for cyclists.

    4 out of 15 world cups 10 monuments A world champ and an olympic silver

    But TIOOYK?

    Jenko

  12. Jenko said:
    Robert Chung said:


    1965 appears not to have been a grand cru vintage year for cyclists.

    4 out of 15 world cups 10 monuments A world champ and an olympic silver

    But TIOOYK?

    Jenko

    Whoops. Sorry. I was trained as a mathematician, not an accountant, so of course I can't subtract. I
    meant 1975.

  13. Robert Chung said:

    Whoops. Sorry. I was trained as a mathematician, not an accountant, so of course I can't subtract.
    I meant 1975.

    Yeah, thought you meant the Dean year.

  14. Robert Chung said:


    Whoops. Sorry. I was trained as a mathematician, not an accountant, so of course I can't subtract.
    I meant 1975.

    world cups monuments (even 0 world cup wins) 1 world champ and two olympic gold medals. But that
    was Bartko as a pursuiter A Tour stage here and there A Vuelta

    Perhaps they MTB? uci.ch20031231 xcM.htm

    Jenko, another 75 fred

  15. "Jenko" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:40041408.115610298@news...

    Quoted message said:
    Robert Chung said:


    Whoops. Sorry. I was trained as a mathematician, not an accountant, so of course I can't
    subtract. I meant 1975.

    world cups monuments (even 0 world cup wins) 1 world champ and two olympic gold medals. But that
    was Bartko as a pursuiter

    Why qualify Bartko's accomplishment, and thus denigrate it?

    Andy Coggan

  16. Andy Coggan said:


    Why qualify Bartko's accomplishment, and thus denigrate it?

    Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker and didn't know 'pursuiter' was an insult. Should have I
    said 'trackie'?

    Or maybe it was because those accomplishments deserve 0 UCI road ranking points.

    Jenko

  17. "Jenko" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:40042393.119589320@news...

    Quoted message said:
    Andy Coggan said:


    Why qualify Bartko's accomplishment, and thus denigrate it?

    Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker and didn't know 'pursuiter' was an insult. Should have I
    said 'trackie'?

    Or maybe it was because those accomplishments deserve 0 UCI road ranking points.

    Would you have added a similar qualification if somebody from the class of '75 had set the
    hour record?

    An Olympic gold is an Olympic gold, and there's many a rider who would trade tons of UCI points
    to have one.

    Andy Coggan

  18. Robert Chung said:

    uci.ch20031109 M.zip

    phys.uu.nlucipoints.php

  19. Andy Coggan said:


    Would you have added a similar qualification if somebody from the class of '75 had set the
    hour record?

    Yes. I'll try to explain anyway. Since we were talking about road rankings and the whole 75 class,
    the intent was to clarify
    1) That those medals were achieved at track
    2) That it was a single guy who did, not several ones as was the case with the 1965 guys' monuments

    Starting with 'But' gave an unintended negative spin to the qualification. My bad. It
    should have been

    Quoted message said:

    1965 appears not to have been a grand cru vintage year for road men cyclists.


    world cups monuments (even 0 world cup wins) A Tour stage here and there A Vuelta

    They do better in track 2 golds and a silver at Sidney 2 world champs

    Jenko

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.