Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Is Brooks saddle quality headed down?

Started by Beaver Charlie · · Last activity · 4 posts · 879 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 February 2003
Last activity
19 February 2003
Original author
Beaver Charlie
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
879
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Now that Brooks is owned by the Italian saddle maker Selle Royal, its classic quality doesn't seem
    to be what it once was. Namely, the leather appears to be thinner and of poorer quality. Workmanship
    seems to have also suffered.

    Anyone else notice this, or just my imagination? BTW, I've been using Brooks saddles on all my bikes
    for over 40 years, so I have some familiarity with the line over time.

  2. beaver charlie said:

    Now that Brooks is owned by the Italian saddle maker Selle Royal, its classic quality doesn't seem
    to be what it once was. Namely, the leather appears to be thinner and of poorer quality.
    Workmanship seems to have also suffered.

    There were user-reports of the B-17's leather getting thinner BEFORE Selle Royal (only recently)
    took over.

    ~PB

  3. I have about ten Brooks saddles in my possession, ranging from almost 25 years old to purchased
    recently. I ran a micrometer over them a while ago, and it definitely seems that the older saddles
    have the thicker leather. This trend was happening a long time before Selle Royal took over Brooks.

    Maybe British cows are more thin skinned these days...

    Nick

    "beaver charlie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Now that Brooks is owned by the Italian saddle maker Selle Royal, its classic quality doesn't seem
    to be what it once was. Namely, the leather appears to be thinner and of poorer quality.
    Workmanship seems to have also suffered.

    Anyone else notice this, or just my imagination? BTW, I've been using Brooks saddles on all my
    bikes for over 40 years, so I have some familiarity with the line over time.

  4. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    I have about ten Brooks saddles in my possession, ranging from almost 25 years old to purchased
    recently. I ran a micrometer over them a while ago, and it definitely seems that the older saddles
    have the thicker leather. This trend was happening a long time before Selle Royal took over Brooks.

    I'm kind of surprised that a custom-saddle cottage industry hasn't cropped up yet. "Tailored to yer
    tushi" or something like that... Granted that a leather saddle tailors itself...but there are
    variations in ichial tuberiosity wideth, thigh thickness... and all that - not to mention one's
    imagination... and I'd think that riders that will spend a hundred bucks on a seatpost would drop a
    couple hundred on a custom saddle...

    Looking at the photos of the Brooks production facilities, it doesn't exactly look like rocket
    science...
    -----------------------
    PeteCresswell

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.