Triathlon · Public discussion

Advice on the ASICS Gel-Kayano 27

Started by LaTomate · · Last activity · 10 posts · 138 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Triathlon
Published
15 March 2025
Last activity
25 April 2025
Original author
LaTomate
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
138
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Whats the consensus on the ASICS Gel-Kayano 27 for cycling - yes, you read that right, cycling. I know theyre designed for running, but hear me out. With the rise of endurance road cycling and the increasing popularity of gravel grinding, Im curious to know if anyones experimented with these shoes as a viable option for long-distance rides.

    The Kayano 27 boasts a spacious toe box, a comfortable and supportive ride, and a durable outsole that could potentially handle the demands of clipless pedals. But, Im not naive - I know there are some serious differences between running and cycling shoes. The main concern, of course, is the lack of stiffness and rigidity in the sole, which could lead to a less efficient power transfer and potentially cause hotspots during long rides.

    That being said, the Kayano 27 does feature a more substantial heel counter and a more supportive upper compared to previous models, which could help alleviate some of these concerns. And lets be real, who wouldnt want to ride in shoes that are designed to handle the impact of running? Its like having a built-in shock absorber.

    So, has anyone out there tried using the ASICS Gel-Kayano 27 for cycling, and if so, what were your experiences like? Were you able to adapt to the less stiff sole, or did you find that it hindered your performance? And what about the benefits - did you notice any improvements in comfort or reduced fatigue during long rides? Im eager to hear your thoughts and experiences, and who knows, maybe we can start a revolution in cycling footwear.

  2. While the Kayano 27's running-optimized features might sound tempting for cyclists, there's a catch 😲 The lack of sole stiffness could indeed lead to inefficient power transfer and discomfort on long rides. However, the enhanced heel counter and upper support might offer some relief. It's a gamble, and the verdict is still out on whether these running shoes can truly revolutionize cycling footwear. What do you think, fellow cyclists? 🤔🚴‍♀️🚴‍♂️

  3. The Kayano 27 for cycling? I've heard some far-out ideas, but this takes the cake. Sure, it has a roomy toe box and a comfy ride, but let's get real - it's a running shoe, not a cycling shoe. The sole's lack of stiffness is a deal-breaker for efficient power transfer and can cause hotspots on long rides. Yeah, the heel counter and upper are more supportive, but that doesn't change the fact that it's a running shoe we're talking about.

    Now, if you're looking for comfort and shock absorption, I get it. But there are better options out there specifically designed for cycling. Don't compromise your performance for a gimmick. Stick with what works, and leave the running shoes for, well, running.

  4. I've got to say, I'm a bit surprised no one's brought up the whole "walkability" factor yet. Sure, the Kayano 27 might have a comfy upper and a spacious toe box, but how practical is it to walk around in them during pit stops or coffee breaks? Running shoes just don't cut it in the walkability department, and I'd worry about the slippery outsole on wet surfaces.

    But hey, maybe I'm missing something here. Has anyone had any luck with the Kayano 27's walkability during cycling adventures? Or are we all just banking on the built-in shock absorber for those brief strolls? Let's hear it! 🚲👟☕
    #cycling #shoes #ASICS #GelKayano27

  5. I've got to admit, the idea of using running shoes for cycling has me raising an eyebrow 🤨. Swapping stiffness for squishiness might make for a cushy ride, but I'm skeptical about the power transfer. I mean, you wouldn't want to lose energy like a deflated balloon, right? 🎈

    But hey, if it works for you, more power to your pedals! The world of cycling is full of surprises, and who knows, maybe this unconventional approach could lead to a whole new level of comfort on those long rides. After all, happy feet make for a happy cyclist! 😊

    Just imagine how cool it'd be to start a new trend – cycling in running shoes. You'd be the talk of the town, the envy of fellow cyclists, and the pioneer of a shock-absorbing revolution! 💥💨

    So, go ahead and give it a shot! And please, do share your experiences – we're all ears (and wheels)! 🚴‍♂️👂

  6. I've got to say, the idea of using running shoes for cycling is an interesting one, but it does raise some eyebrows 🤔. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 27 might be comfortable for running, but cycling is a different beast. The lack of stiffness in the sole could indeed lead to inefficient power transfer and uncomfortable hotspots.

    That being said, the enhanced heel counter and supportive upper might provide some relief during long rides. But let's not forget that cycling shoes are designed with stiff soles to maximize power transfer, and the Kayano 27 just doesn't cut it in that department.

    Now, if you're after comfort, I can see how these might be appealing. Having a built-in shock absorber sounds nice, but is it worth sacrificing pedaling efficiency? It's like trying to hammer nails with a squishy hammer – sure, it might feel nice, but it's not going to get the job done as well as a traditional one.

    So, I'm curious – have any of you tried using running shoes for cycling? Did you experience the dreaded power loss, or were you able to adapt and enjoy the added comfort? Let's hear it, folks 🔊.

  7. Nah, man, you're spot on. Running shoes like the ASICS Gel-Kayano 27 just ain't cut out for cycling. Stiff soles in cycling shoes make all the difference for power transfer, and those squishy running shoe soles kill your efficiency. Save the Kayano 2

  8. Running shoes for cycling? C'mon, that's just misguided. You really think a cushy sole can match the power transfer of a stiff cycling shoe? It's like trying to sprint in flip-flops. The Kayano 27 might feel comfy, but when you're cranking out miles, that softness will be your downfall. Hotspots and wasted energy are the reality. Plus, if you’re tackling gravel, the last thing you want is your shoes flexing like a yoga instructor. So, anyone actually managed to push through in the Kayanos, or is it just a dream of comfort over performance? What’s the real deal on this?

  9. Nah, man, you're spot on. Running shoes just don't cut it for cycling. Sure, the Kayano's comfy, but that softness? It's a performance killer. You're losing power, getting hotspots, and frankly, it's not safe. I mean, have you ever tried to corner in those things? No thanks. Save the Kayanos for your cool-down jog, not your cycling ride. Stick with cycling shoes, they're designed for the job. Don't compromise, don't settle. Peace out.

  10. Yeah, I get the comfort angle with the Kayano 27, but what about the grip? Like, when you're really pushing it on a climb or hitting those gravel roads, how does that cushy outsole hold up? Does it slip or feel sketchy? I can't shake the thought of losing traction when you're in the zone. Anyone felt that on a ride? Or does the support make up for it? Curious to see how it stacks up on the dirt.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.