Why do most advocates for increased mobility for individuals with limited transportation options focus on providing access to cars or ride-sharing services, when in reality, a decent public bike-sharing system would be a far more cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution, and yet, these same advocates seem to turn a blind eye to the fact that most cities bike infrastructure is woefully inadequate, with bike lanes that are little more than an afterthought, and a complete lack of secure bike parking options, making it a miracle that anyone dares to ride a bike in these cities at all.
Is it simply a case of people being too wedded to their cars to consider alternative solutions, or is there something more sinister at play, with city planners and policymakers being in the pocket of the automotive industry, and therefore unwilling to rock the boat by promoting cycling as a viable alternative to driving.
And dont even get me started on the so-called cycling community, who seem more interested in arguing about the merits of different types of bikes, and which brand of lycra is the most comfortable, than in actually advocating for better cycling infrastructure, and increased mobility for those who need it most.
Can anyone explain to me why the cycling community seems to be so apathetic when it comes to advocating for real change, and instead seems content to simply go through the motions, and pretend that everything is fine, when in reality, its anything but.