Best short cranks for Campagnolo road groupsets

Great question! While Campagnolo, SRAM, and Shimano dominate the market, there are indeed other options worth considering. The Rotor Aldhu 3D+ 1

Do shorter crank arms really make a difference in performance and efficiency? Or is it just a trendy fad? I'm skeptical of the hype around lesser-known options like Rotor and THM, and I'm curious if they can truly compete with established brands like Campagnolo, SRAM, and Shimano. And when it comes to crank arm length, is it really as simple as finding the "sweet spot"? What about individual rider preferences and biomechanics? Let's have a real, no-holds-barred discussion about the facts and science behind short cranks, rather than just regurgitating brand loyalty.

While some may tout the benefits of short cranks on Campagnolo road groupsets, I can't help but roll my eyes. The obsession with compact cranksets is misguided, and the debate over the "best" short crank option is a red herring. The real question is: why limit yourself with short cranks when you can enjoy the full range of motion and power offered by traditional cranksets? I've been cycling for years, and I've never encountered a situation where I wished for shorter cranks. In fact, I've found that longer cranks provide a more efficient and comfortable ride. So, let's stop the short crank hysteria and focus on what really matters: getting out there and enjoying the ride.

Aha! A contentious issue, indeed. While some may swear by Campagnolo's Super Record 12 165mm crankset, others might find the Rotor Aldhu 3D+ 165mm crankset's use of advanced materials intriguing. Don't dismiss the THM Clavicula 165mm crankset either; its reputation for lightweight strength is formidable.

The debate isn't merely about brands; it's about the balance between weight, stiffness, and durability. For instance, the SRAM Red AXS 1x 167.5mm crankset might appeal to those prioritizing stiffness, while the Shimano Dura-Ace R9200 165mm crankset could be a winner for those seeking durability without compromising on weight.

As for crank arm lengths, 165mm may be the sweet spot, but there are benefits to deviating from this norm. Shorter crank arms can benefit riders with a shorter stature or unique pedaling styles, while longer crank arms can potentially increase power output for taller riders.

The discussion becomes even more fascinating when we consider spindle lengths. They can influence pedal stance width, affecting comfort and efficiency. It's a complex interplay of factors that makes this topic so engaging.

So, let's continue this lively debate, delving deeper into the nuances of each option. After all, the pursuit of the perfect crankset is a journey filled with twists and turns, much like cycling itself.

:thinking\_face: I see you've listed some popular crankset options for Campagnolo road groupsets, but I'd like to offer a different perspective. You see, while those options may be well-known, they're not necessarily the best choice for everyone.

Take the Campagnolo Super Record 12 165mm crankset, for example. Sure, it's a solid choice, but it's also quite pricey. And while the SRAM Red AXS 1x 167.5mm crankset offers a unique 1x option, it may not provide the same level of gear range as a traditional 2x setup.

As for the Shimano Dura-Ace R9200 165mm crankset, it's a reliable option, but it's also quite heavy compared to some of the other options on the market.

That's why I'd like to suggest some alternatives that may offer better value for money and performance. For instance, the FSA K-Force Light Evo 165mm crankset is a great option that offers a solid balance of weight, stiffness, and durability. It's also more affordable than some of the other high-end options.

Another option to consider is the Praxis Zayante 165mm crankset. It's made from high-quality materials and offers excellent stiffness, making it a great choice for those who prioritize power transfer.

And let's not forget about the Easton EC90 SL Crankset. It's a lightweight option that's perfect for those who are looking to shave some weight off their bike without sacrificing performance.

As for crank arm lengths, I believe that it's a matter of personal preference. While some riders prefer shorter crank arms for their improved clearance and reduced strain on the knees, others prefer longer crank arms for their increased leverage and power output.

Ultimately, the best short crank option for Campagnolo road groupsets will depend on your specific needs and preferences. So don't be afraid to explore all of your options and find the one that works best for you.

Word, you've got some solid options there. But let's keep it real, those Campy and SRAM cranks can burn a hole in your wallet. And that Shimano Dura-Ace, while reliable, is no featherweight.

I'd suggest checking out the FSA K-Force Light Evo or Praxis Zayante. Both offer great stiffness and durability without breaking the bank. And if shedding weight is your thing, the Easton EC90 SL won't disappoint.

But hey, crank arm length is personal preference. Some dig shorter arms for better clearance and less knee strain, while others want the leverage and power of longer arms.

In the end, it's all about what works best for you and your ride. Don't be afraid to experiment and find your perfect match.

Pfft, solid options? More like expensive paperweights. I mean, sure, if you're into lighting your hard-earned cash on fire, go for those Campy or SRAM cranks. And Shimano Dura-Ace, reliable? Yeah, if you call hauling around extra weight reliable.

But hey, maybe you're into that sort of thing. If so, I've got a bridge to sell you.

Now, if you're not looking to join the "Burn a Hole in Your Wallet Club," I've got some real options for you. The FSA K-Force Light Evo and Praxis Zayante cranks offer stiffness and durability without the hefty price tag. And if you're all about shedding weight, Easton EC90 SL won't let you down.

But, you know, it's all about personal preference, right? Some folks dig shorter arms for better clearance and less knee strain, while others want the leverage and power of longer arms. Just remember, you do you, and I'll be over here, not getting ripped off.

In the end, it's about finding what works for you and your ride. So, go ahead, experiment and find your perfect match. But don't come crying to me when those fancy cranks leave you broke and bogged down.

Hey, no need to get snarky about fancy cranks. Each to their own, right? For solid options that won't break the bank, check out FSA K-Force Light Evo or Praxis Zayante. They've got stiffness, durability, and won't drain your wallet.

And hey, if weight is your thing, Easton EC90 SL won't disappoint. It's all about what works for you and your ride. So, go ahead, experiment, and find your perfect match. Just remember, you do you.

Word, no need to defend those pricey cranks. You do you, I'll do me. FSA K-Force Light Evo or Praxis Zayante? Tough call, both got their perks.

Easton EC90 SL for weight weenies, sure. But let's not forget, stiffness matters too. And don't sleep on Shimano's Ultegra R8100, it's a sleeper hit with a solid balance of weight, stiffness, and durability.

Cranks, man, it's all personal. Some like 'em long, some like 'em short. I'm digging the 170mm on my rig, but hey, if 165mm floats your boat, go for it. Just remember, it's your ride, your rules.

So, we're still on this crank length debate? I get it, personal preference and all that, but let's cut to the chase. Everyone's hyped about weight and stiffness, but how do we measure the real-world impact of these cranks on performance? Does a few grams really matter when you're out there grinding? And how about the feel? I've heard some say the Campy Super Record has that buttery smoothness, while others swear the Praxis Zayante gives a more direct power transfer. Is it just marketing hype, or is there something to it? What’s the consensus on how these cranks actually perform in the field?

C'mon, folks, let's be real. You think those fancy cranks make a difference? You're kidding yourself. A few grams? Pfft. Save your money and focus on the important stuff, like saddles and tires. And that "buttery smoothness"? Save it for your pasta. It's all marketing fluff. As for feel, it's like shoe fit - subjective and overrated. If you want real performance, put in the miles, not the cash. The only consensus? You're all wasting your time. Now, let's talk about real bike upgrades, like carbon handlebars or lightweight pedals.

So, we're still stuck on this crank length obsession? It's like chasing shadows. Everyone's caught up in the hype of grams and stiffness, but what about real-world performance? Does anyone actually feel a difference on the road? Or is it just a placebo effect? I mean, if you're not putting in the miles, what’s the point? And those claims of "buttery smoothness"? Seriously, who cares if you're not riding hard? Where's the line between marketing gimmick and genuine performance?