Are we really still debating whether the GT Grade Carbon can handle both time trials and road riding? I mean, come on, its a carbon bike, not a fragile vase. Seriously though, can someone please enlighten me as to why some of you think this bike is only suited for one type of riding? The grade carbons frame geometry and design features, such as its disc brakes, thru-axles, and a seatpost thats designed to reduce road vibrations, would suggest its more than capable of handling the demands of both time trials and road riding.
What exactly is the argument against using the GT Grade Carbon for time trials? Is it the bikes weight? I highly doubt that, considering its made from lightweight carbon fiber. Is it the bikes aerodynamics? Again, I think not, given its sleek frame design and integrated cable routing. And please dont even get me started on the argument that its not stiff enough for time trials. Have you guys even looked at the bikes specs? Its got a tapered head tube, a press-fit bottom bracket, and a full carbon fork. Thats stiff.
And what about the argument that its not comfortable enough for road riding? I mean, I get that its a bit more aggressive than some of the other endurance road bikes out there, but that doesnt mean its not capable of handling long days in the saddle. In fact, many riders have reported back with glowing reviews of the bikes comfort and versatility.
So, lets get to the bottom of this. Is the GT Grade Carbon really only suited for one type of riding, or are some of you just too narrow-minded to see its true potential?