Considering the biomechanical advantages of shorter cranks, particularly for riders with a lower inseam, its surprising that there isnt more discussion around the potential need for a different handlebar drop to optimize the benefits of shorter cranks.
If shorter cranks allow for a more upright posture and reduced strain on the knees and hips, wouldnt it stand to reason that the current handlebar drop recommendations, which are largely based on crank length, may not be suitable for riders using shorter cranks?
The traditional approach to determining handlebar drop is based on a riders height and the type of riding theyll be doing, with the assumption that crank length will be within a certain range. However, with the increasing popularity of shorter cranks, particularly among riders with a lower inseam, its possible that the current handlebar drop recommendations may not be optimal for these riders.
For example, if a rider is using shorter cranks to reduce strain on their knees and hips, but still has a relatively low handlebar drop, they may not be fully realizing the benefits of the shorter cranks. Conversely, if a rider is using shorter cranks but has a handlebar drop that is too high, they may be putting unnecessary strain on their back and shoulders.
Given the potential benefits of shorter cranks, particularly for riders with a lower inseam, its surprising that there isnt more research or discussion around the need for a different handlebar drop to optimize the benefits of shorter cranks.
Do the benefits of shorter cranks necessitate a re-evaluation of traditional handlebar drop recommendations, or are there other factors at play that would suggest that traditional handlebar drop recommendations are still suitable for riders using shorter cranks?