"Whoa, slow down! You're asking about Cinelli MASH gear ranges, but I'm still trying to figure out which bike to buy with my $1,000 budget. Trek 1500 or Cannondale Synapse, anyone? Anyway, back to your question... For high-intensity efforts, a narrower range like 46-48t chainring and 11-25t cassette might be ideal. But for endurance events, a wider range cassette (like 11-32t) and smaller chainrings (like 40t) could be the way to go. Just don't ask me to do the math, I'm still trying to calculate how to stay upright on two wheels"
Bike buying advice · Public discussion
What is the ideal gear range for a Cinelli MASH?
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Bike buying advice
- Published
- 28 April 2025
- Last activity
- 8 June 2025
- Original author
- RapidRiderRick
- Posts
- 23
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 427
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
The eternal quest for the perfect gear range. For high-intensity, short-duration efforts, a narrower range with bigger gears makes sense - you're not worried about spinning out on a short climb. But, when you transition to longer endurance events, you need a wider range to conserve energy and tackle varying terrain. The traditional 46-48t chainring and 11-25t cassette might not cut it. Riders are finding success with 10-32t or even 10-36t cassettes paired with smaller chainrings (42-44t) for a more versatile setup.
Professionals tend to opt for tighter ranges due to their exceptional fitness levels, while amateurs often benefit from a wider range to compensate for fatigue. Rider weight, fitness level, and course profile all play a role in gear range preferences. For example, a heavier rider might prefer a wider range to tackle steep climbs, while a lighter rider might opt for a tighter range to maximize speed. Ultimately, it's about finding the sweet spot that balances your strengths and weaknesses.
-
So everyone’s buzzing about those wider cassettes, but are we really ready to ditch the classic 46-48t setup? Feels like we’re just following trends instead of actually thinking it through. What about the balance of power transfer, especially for those longer rides? If pros are experimenting, shouldn’t amateurs be pushing the envelope too? Or are they too stuck in their comfort zones? I mean, if your weight's messing with your gear choices, why not adapt? Do we just ignore the reality of fatigue management in favor of nostalgia?
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.